For the record, this post is not about the LeeOswald as PrayerMan Theory. It is in regards to "excerpts","versions","as edited",and "proclamation". And, of course, ​links.
[/QUOTE]


Mark A O'Blazney: "Egads !! (learned that one from Jabba Jim Fetzer ) Methoughts I were be reading Shakespeare here. That you, Billy Bard ?"[/QUOTE]


Is there a specific criticism of the posted conclusions, Mr O'Blazney? Or, is it as it appears to me Mr O'Blazney, a criticism aimed strictly at the poster? In any event, another post that causes me to review DPF rules, as well as researching the correctly applied definition of a"Troll/Troller".
[/QUOTE]


Mark A O'Blazney: "Why, yes, Mr. Trotter, student of JFK assassination, there IS a specific criticism of your posted conclusions…………. what the heck are you talking about? Am i the only one who is confused with your strange sentences? Is it just me? You were much more understandable years ago, I don't know what the heck you mean these days. But, does anyone? Strange Times."[/QUOTE]


Question:"what the heck are you talking about?"
Answer:The thread subject matter and discussion.

Question:"Am i the only one who is confused with your strange sentences? Is it just me?"
Answer: It appears to be the case, yes. I do not recall any additional such comments regarding said post.

Comment/Question:"I don't know what the heck you mean these days. But, does anyone?
Answer/Comment: If seeking actual understanding, why not ask? Or, as appears to me to be the case, is an ad hominem attack the goal?