Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Dr. Judy Wood's Book 'Where Did The Towers Go?'

  1. #1

    Default Dr. Judy Wood's Book 'Where Did The Towers Go?'

    While aware of Woods work and theories for a long time, I had not purchased her quite expensive book until a few days ago when I found an as new copy for a low price. While I don't accept all of her theories, I'm open to some of the others and are a new way of looking at what happened. She definitely poses some logical problems with other alternative scenarios [alternative to the official version] - and points out events that can not yet be explained by the official version nor any of the standard alternative '911 Truth' versions of events at the WTC. However, the best part of the book are the photos - and for that alone I think it is worth adding to any 911 library. While many of the photos we've seen before on the internet, no other book has so many clear photos, and even some I've never seen before that are important. Her unique way of looking at what happened, even if I don't agree with all of it and dislike her inventions of terms for visual features repeatedly seen, the book belongs IMO in any 911 library. I think you'll find yourself looking again and again at the photos and some VERY interesting witness and first responder accounts verbatim that are not so easily available and rarely in print. The transcribed verbal accounts make clear that what happened was even stranger than most realize. I still think nano-thermite was used to bring the buildings down. Wood does not. Despite that, there are many other anomalies to be explained that nano-thermite has a difficult time in explaining for some events and phenomenon. I think that nano-thermite was not the only means used to demolish the towers and that Wood's questions, if not her proposed answers, make the book worth is price and weight. No other book deals with the very very strange 'rain' of persons who jumped to their deaths [hundreds of them] - and from places not yet consumed by fire and many too far away from the building to make sense - others looking as if they had not jumped, but were pulled or pushed out by forces unknown. It is a large book on very heavy and good paper, about 600 pages with lots of photos - some you've never seen; also lots of eye witness testimony - some you've not heard. I found my copy at a used bookstore in London for a good price. The new price is still rather high. Wood was fired from her University teaching job for her work on 911 and had been rather quiet recently. It will proudly stand in my growing library of better 911 reference books for sure. The last part on the Hutchinson effect, which she believes explains much or all of what happened is a bit esoteric science, but I have studied the work of Hutchinson and is not to be taken lightly. He was an electronic and physics genius living in Canada. He had a home laboratory which was raided by the RCMP and all his equipment seized. His ideas and theories are somewhat related to the work of Tesla. He too is now very silent or silenced. I don't find any of the parts of the book I personally don't find convincing totally out of the realm of possibility nor making the book any less valuable. A lot of very weird technologies were used on that day - most state-of-the-art and classified and then covered-up.
    If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will.” - Frederick Douglass
    "Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
    "Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn

  2. Default

    Judy Wood has studied 9/11 with an open mind and sharp eyes and has reached surprising conclusions. Her book is important. The top down destruction of Towers 1 and 2 can not be explained by controlled demolition I think.

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ivan De Mey View Post
    Judy Wood has studied 9/11 with an open mind and sharp eyes and has reached surprising conclusions. Her book is important. The top down destruction of Towers 1 and 2 can not be explained by controlled demolition I think.
    I agree that she has looked at the event and subevents of 911 WTC 'collapses' in a unique way and come to surprising and disturbing questions that can not simply be dismissed as strange. They demand answers and a complete answer IMO is not yet provided. I think that certain types of controlled demolition with nanothermite can explain most of what happened, but it has a difficult time in explaining all that happened. I think there may have been multiple modalities of weaponry used. The biggest problem I see for her suggestion/hinting as to what happened is where such a weapon or weapons could have been fired from and where in the world such power could have been made available! I agree her book and analysis are very important, and in thinking outside of the box she has brought up questions that demand answers from other doubters of the official version of 911 - from those who posit a different version of the events. One thing is for sure...911 was a magic show on a GRAND scale and what was apparently seen and what we were told to believe and think we saw was not what happened nor did it in any way cover how it happened. The official version was a fabricated and knowing lie of ENORMOUS proportions and with horrible consequences that are with us to this very day and will be unless and until the Big Lie is fully exposed and those behind it brought to justice.
    If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will.” - Frederick Douglass
    "Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
    "Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn

  4. #4

    Default

    Has anyone ever documented the existence of a DEW that could destroy huge buildings like WTC buildings?
    "We'll know our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the American public believes is false." --William J. Casey, D.C.I

    "We will lead every revolution against us." --Theodore Herzl

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lauren Johnson View Post
    Has anyone ever documented the existence of a DEW that could destroy huge buildings like WTC buildings?
    No. If they exist at that power level it is kept secret. It is known that such devices for experimental purposes exist and that they have tried to develop weapons of this type, but to date officially none exist of any great power and I've not even heard of anyone claiming to have seen the effects of them or the weapons themselves beyond some programs that can apparently intercept and destroy missiles, tanks, persons, etc. The closest hint of anything along those lines were some of the speculation of what would be necessary for the 'Starwars' Program under Reagan and after - but the power needed to take out a missile or satellite in outer space is much much less than a building. Microwave and laser systems do exist that can focus on a small object and heat it up and thus destroy it. The largest admitted targets for directed energy weapons are missiles and planes [which one only has to destroy any small part of by heating/ablation to completely destroy/disable the object].

    The power and size of such a weapon against the WTC towers is to me mind-boggling, and the holes seen in WTC 5 and 6 would almost have had to have come from directly above. If such weaponry existed, the use of conventional weapons would for the most part no longer be needed, except that they might still be cheaper. 911 and especially at the WTC remains unique in the difficulty to explain what happened and how it was made to happen. I can think of no other example worldwide that even comes close.

    Some laser systems have been developed to destroy missiles etc. They are classified as to their range and power, but even if they work [as they are said to] to destroy a missile, that is perhaps one 10,000,000th the mass and energy needed to pulverize WTC sized buildings. This is why I think only nanothermite [and quite a lot of it] could do the bulk of the pulverization and destruction. However, that alone does not explain some anomalous things that happened on that day....... Each main tower weighed half a million TONS - and they were turned into fine dust with the exception of some of the larger steel beams. Doing the math, to pulverize all that, and almost instantly, takes a huge huge huge amount of energy. The energy calculations have been done, but I don't have them at my fingertips now. For sure, gravitational potential energy was insufficient by a very long shot - making the 'official version' not worth another thought.

    Another problem with directed energy weaponry on 911 would be how to target only some of the WTC buildings, as the surrounding building were for the most part unscathed or only minimally damaged. Some were not damaged at all other than some small amount of broken windows. Yet another problem with DEW is what is known as 'blooming' - they become defocused or blocked by dust [they need clean air or better no air to operate well]. Obviously, once the towers began to explode there was a hell of a lot of dust that would block any such weapon targeting lower levels to make what we saw.

    Wood is positing use of the Hutchinson effect - which to my thinking is a real effect and a very strange one at that [by normal standards](although MUCH fraudulent claims and videos on this are also to be found). However, as far as is publicly known this effect has only been demonstrated in small laboratory sized demonstrations. How one would scale that up to destroying one and a half million tons in ten seconds is beyond me. Also, the Hutchinson effect is strongest on electrically conductive materials such as metal and the WTC towers were mostly cement, furniture, drywall, etc. The % of metal can be calculated [I've seen the numbers and again don't have them with me], but are [I'm guessing here] maybe 15% or less by mass - and with the exception of the other facing of aluminum, hidden deep inside the building. The strongest evidence Wood makes for something beyond nanothermite are the huge vertical holes in smaller WTC buildings, the strange destruction patterns of cars in the area, the seeming disintegration in flight of falling pieces of the towers, the disappearance of the top section of one tower that detached and started to fall over, the shortness of the seismic event, the general lack of noise that should have been produced, and the huge number of persons who jumped or were thrown out of the buildings to their deaths. In these points she really has raised questions that even nanothermite advocates are hard-pressed to explain fully. The official version can't even begin to address any of those. It was one strange event for sure - but most people are totally unaware of this fact. In completely different ways, equally strange physical events happened at the Pentagon and Shanksville. Again, the official version can be totally dismissed.
    Last edited by Peter Lemkin; 11-10-2017 at 05:51 AM.
    If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will.” - Frederick Douglass
    "Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
    "Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •