Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 40 of 40

Thread: Prince Charles' wives and auto accidents

  1. #31

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Paul Rigby View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Myra Bronstein View Post
    Um, so to summarize:

    6/97-Charles' mistress Camilla Parker Bowles has a serious auto accident.

    8/97-Charles' ex wife Diana dies in the auto "accident" in Paris.

    11/97-Charles' ex mistress Kanga Tryon dies.

    That's quite a time line.
    John Morgan names Princess Diana’s MI6 assassin on Kevin Barrett’s Truth Jihad Radio:

    http://noliesradio.org/archives/93121

    Second hour: John Morgan

    A bombshell new book published this week names the MI6 officer who headed the operation team that carried out the assassination of Princess Diana in Paris in late-August 1997.

    The book entitled How They Murdered Princess Diana: The Shocking Truth is the most complete evidence-based account yet published on the car crash in the Alma Tunnel that took the lives of Diana and her lover Dodi Fayed.

    Written by Australian author John Morgan – who has been researching the deaths for the past nine years – this book exposes Sherard Cowper-Coles, former British ambassador to Saudi Arabia, as the head of the assassination operation that orchestrated the car crash. Also revealed is substantial detail on how the murder was carried out – the naming of MI6 agents employed on the job and particulars about their respective roles.

    The book reveals that Princess Diana was effectively murdered by deliberate mistreatment in her ambulance by people who were supposed to be saving her life. The author shows that this was a back-up plan which was automatically triggered after it became clear that Diana had survived the crash.

    Morgan has spent years studying and assessing the huge amount of evidence pertaining to the Paris crash – including over 8,000 pages of inquest transcripts and official police investigative reports. He also analysed and published over 500 documents that were secretly supplied to him in 2010. The explosive material – which included the official post-mortem reports for both Diana and Dodi – came from within the Scotland Yard Paget investigation, but all 500 plus documents had been fraudulently withheld from the inquest jury in London.

    How They Murdered Princess Diana covers the entire story of what occurred, including the massive post-crash cover-up conducted by British authorities. The book exposes the official 2007-8 inquest into the deaths as one of the most corrupt court investigations in England’s judicial history. This is the first time the complete story has been addressed in such chilling detail – a true account using the witnesses own words that will at times leave the reader shocked, aghast and breathless.

    A leading UK QC, Michael Mansfield, who served throughout the six months of the London inquest has stated: “I have no doubt that the volumes written by John Morgan will come to be regarded as the ‘Magnum Opus’ on the crash … that resulted in the unlawful killing of Diana, Princess of Wales and Dodi Al Fayed and the cover-up that followed.”

    Speaking from his home in Brisbane Morgan – who features in a London play titled Truth Lies Diana starting in Charing Cross Theatre in January 2015 – says that the time is approaching when the parties who carried out the assassination must be brought to justice. He said that “the Paris crash was one of the most highly-coordinated inter-governmental operations ever carried out – and the ensuing cover-up over many years has been just as coordinated and just as sinister”. Morgan continued: “Many in the public now know that an assassination occurred on that night in Paris and are hopeful that there will be some justice and the perpetrators will be called to account, sooner rather than later”
    http://princessdianadeaththeevidence...ess-diana.html

    Product details
    Paperback: 798 pages
    Publisher: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform (10 Dec 2014)
    Language: English
    ISBN-10: 1505375061
    ISBN-13: 978-1505375060
    THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2015

    The Death of Diana

    Jim Fetzer's interview with John Morgan

    The show begins with a look at the death of Diana, Princess of Wales, in Paris, which provides the standard "mainstream media" account of the accident and its circumstances. It follows with an extensive interview with John Morgan, who is the world's leading expert on her death, which makes clear that this was not an automobile accident but a cleverly-planned assassination. John Morgan reveals that the crash in the tunnel appears to have been orchestrated by MI6 on the orders of senior British Royals. Princess Diana survived the crash but was brutally murdered by deliberate mistreatment in the ambulance by people who were supposed to be saving her. His book, How They Murdered Princess Diana, shows that the 2007-8 London inquest into the deaths – headed by Lord Justice Scott Baker – was one of the most inept and corrupt inquests in the history of the British judicial system. It also exposes the 2004-6 Scotland Yard Paget investigation as a farce dedicated to covering up what occurred rather than to uncovering truth. The perps never thought anyone would or could ever do a full investigation piecing it all together – but this is exactly what John Morgan has done. This event was a state-sponsored murder of one of the most beloved celebrities in the world, Diana, Princess of Wales.

    http://s53.podbean.com/pb/bf41edf5a9...ealep19mp3.mp3
    "There are three sorts of conspiracy: by the people who complain, by the people who write, by the people who take action. There is nothing to fear from the first group, the two others are more dangerous; but the police have to be part of all three,"

    Joseph Fouche

  2. #32

    Default

    Morgan is very interesting but I find Fetzer almost impossible to listen to. You can hear him breathing down the microphone the whole time and he has a tendency to come out with completely ridiculous shite as though it's established fact (LBJ, McCloy, Hoover etc. meeting the night before the assassination.)

    Haven't listened to the Barrett show yet but I suspect that that will be a lot better.
    “The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him.”
    ― Leo Tolstoy,

  3. #33

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by R.K. Locke View Post
    Morgan is very interesting but I find Fetzer almost impossible to listen to. You can hear him breathing down the microphone the whole time and he has a tendency to come out with completely ridiculous shite as though it's established fact (LBJ, McCloy, Hoover etc. meeting the night before the assassination.)

    Haven't listened to the Barrett show yet but I suspect that that will be a lot better.
    I know what you mean about Fetzer, but the interview is still worth the listen: How They Murdered Princess Diana: The Shocking Truth is the distillation of his previous, remarkably diligent, research and is unquestionably the gold standard on the subject. That I finished the book with profound reservations about his conclusions left me wondering whether I had failed to follow the evidence presented - the besetting sin - or that my doubts had real merit. One example.

    Morgan is convinced that Diana's last journey saw her chased not by paparazzi, but rather an SAS-simulacrum, driving much more powerful bikes: he makes a compelling case for this and I rather suspect he's right. But is it really conceivable, as he insists, that the SAS hit squad would have entrusted the driving of the blocking Fiat Uno to James Adanson, the photographer, even if the latter role was essentially a cover for an MI6 asset of long-standing? Why entrust such a role to a figure from outside the special forces milieu? In the event that Henri Paul had either panicked or made the conscious decision to use the vastly superior weight, strength and speed of the Mercedes to smash the impeding Uno out the way, who would have reacted better - a special forces guy who had trained for such eventualities, or Adanson, a man with no obvious or suspected expertise in this sort of thing?

    Now, it is perfectly conceivable that Morgan is right - and the eye-witness descriptions of the Uno driver and his distinctivly attired canine companion strongly suggest so - and that the answer lies in an accurate account of Adanson's career and background. But the evidence on that background is not available, or, at any rate, not adduced by Morgan; and I am left with my reservation.
    "There are three sorts of conspiracy: by the people who complain, by the people who write, by the people who take action. There is nothing to fear from the first group, the two others are more dangerous; but the police have to be part of all three,"

    Joseph Fouche

  4. #34

    Default Why has Duchess of Cambridge not attended single state banquet since marrying Prince William?

    Why has Duchess of Cambridge not attended single state banquet since marrying Prince William?

    By EPHRAIM HARDCASTLE FOR THE DAILY MAIL
    PUBLISHED: 00:00, 6 March 2015 | UPDATED: 01:08, 6 March 2015

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/ar...e-William.html

    The Duchess of Cambridge didn’t attend the Queen and the Duke of Edinburgh’s banquet for the President of Mexico, which included the Prince of Wales, the Duchess of Cornwall, the Princess Royal and the Duke of York.

    Curiously, since marrying Prince William in 2011, Kate hasn’t attended a single state banquet. My source says: ‘It’s long been muttered about.
    The official answer is that, as they are not full-time working royals, it’s not for them to do yet. It’s odd, though.’ Might Kate outshine the royals, as Diana did?
    "There are three sorts of conspiracy: by the people who complain, by the people who write, by the people who take action. There is nothing to fear from the first group, the two others are more dangerous; but the police have to be part of all three,"

    Joseph Fouche

  5. #35

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Paul Rigby View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Myra Bronstein View Post
    Um, so to summarize:

    6/97-Charles' mistress Camilla Parker Bowles has a serious auto accident.

    8/97-Charles' ex wife Diana dies in the auto "accident" in Paris.

    11/97-Charles' ex mistress Kanga Tryon dies.

    That's quite a time line.
    John Morgan names Princess Diana’s MI6 assassin on Kevin Barrett’s Truth Jihad Radio:

    http://noliesradio.org/archives/93121

    Second hour: John Morgan

    A bombshell new book published this week names the MI6 officer who headed the operation team that carried out the assassination of Princess Diana in Paris in late-August 1997.

    The book entitled How They Murdered Princess Diana: The Shocking Truth is the most complete evidence-based account yet published on the car crash in the Alma Tunnel that took the lives of Diana and her lover Dodi Fayed.

    Written by Australian author John Morgan – who has been researching the deaths for the past nine years – this book exposes Sherard Cowper-Coles, former British ambassador to Saudi Arabia, as the head of the assassination operation that orchestrated the car crash. Also revealed is substantial detail on how the murder was carried out – the naming of MI6 agents employed on the job and particulars about their respective roles.

    The book reveals that Princess Diana was effectively murdered by deliberate mistreatment in her ambulance by people who were supposed to be saving her life. The author shows that this was a back-up plan which was automatically triggered after it became clear that Diana had survived the crash.

    Morgan has spent years studying and assessing the huge amount of evidence pertaining to the Paris crash – including over 8,000 pages of inquest transcripts and official police investigative reports. He also analysed and published over 500 documents that were secretly supplied to him in 2010. The explosive material – which included the official post-mortem reports for both Diana and Dodi – came from within the Scotland Yard Paget investigation, but all 500 plus documents had been fraudulently withheld from the inquest jury in London.

    How They Murdered Princess Diana covers the entire story of what occurred, including the massive post-crash cover-up conducted by British authorities. The book exposes the official 2007-8 inquest into the deaths as one of the most corrupt court investigations in England’s judicial history. This is the first time the complete story has been addressed in such chilling detail – a true account using the witnesses own words that will at times leave the reader shocked, aghast and breathless.

    A leading UK QC, Michael Mansfield, who served throughout the six months of the London inquest has stated: “I have no doubt that the volumes written by John Morgan will come to be regarded as the ‘Magnum Opus’ on the crash … that resulted in the unlawful killing of Diana, Princess of Wales and Dodi Al Fayed and the cover-up that followed.”

    Speaking from his home in Brisbane Morgan – who features in a London play titled Truth Lies Diana starting in Charing Cross Theatre in January 2015 – says that the time is approaching when the parties who carried out the assassination must be brought to justice. He said that “the Paris crash was one of the most highly-coordinated inter-governmental operations ever carried out – and the ensuing cover-up over many years has been just as coordinated and just as sinister”. Morgan continued: “Many in the public now know that an assassination occurred on that night in Paris and are hopeful that there will be some justice and the perpetrators will be called to account, sooner rather than later”
    http://princessdianadeaththeevidence...ess-diana.html

    Product details
    Paperback: 798 pages
    Publisher: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform (10 Dec 2014)
    Language: English
    ISBN-10: 1505375061
    ISBN-13: 978-1505375060
    Published on 24 Jan 2015

    Investigative writer John Morgan is interviewed live on Talk Radio Europe regarding his latest book, How They Murdered Princess Diana and also the West End play Truth Lies Diana currently showing at London's Charing Cross Theatre. Interviewer: Bill Padley. Interview date: Thursday, 22 January 2015.

    John Morgan is viewed by many as the world's leading expert on the death of Diana. His investigation website is at www.princessdianadeaththeevidence.weebly*.com

    "There are three sorts of conspiracy: by the people who complain, by the people who write, by the people who take action. There is nothing to fear from the first group, the two others are more dangerous; but the police have to be part of all three,"

    Joseph Fouche

  6. #36

    Default House of Mystery Radio Show

    House of Mystery Radio Show: #15 Who Killed Princess Diana - interview with John Morgan

    Published on 28 Feb 2015

    Author and Journalist from Brisbane, Australia talks about his book series on the Mysterious Death of Princess Diana

    "There are three sorts of conspiracy: by the people who complain, by the people who write, by the people who take action. There is nothing to fear from the first group, the two others are more dangerous; but the police have to be part of all three,"

    Joseph Fouche

  7. Default

    Wow this guy is one major authority. Ten books on this case. I wonder if her sons think she was murdered. I recall reading something about that a few years ago.

    Nineteen years today. Murder Inc.

  8. #38

    Default One of final interviews before death of Princess Diana assassination author John Morgan

    One of final interviews before death of Princess Diana assassination author John Morgan

    "There are three sorts of conspiracy: by the people who complain, by the people who write, by the people who take action. There is nothing to fear from the first group, the two others are more dangerous; but the police have to be part of all three,"

    Joseph Fouche

  9. #39

    Default Father of Princess Diana chauffeur makes damning claims: 'They were murdered'

    Father of Princess Diana chauffeur makes damning claims: 'They were murdered'

    Jean Paul claims members of Scotland Yard told him there was a secret plot to kill the princess.

    By Alicia Adejobi
    August 7, 2017 08:40 BST

    http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/father-prin...rdered-1633798

    Princess Diana died because of a "secret" murder plot, according to the father of the man that chauffeured her on the night of the fatal crash. Henri Paul, acting head of security at the Ritz hotel in Paris, was driving the Mercedes that crashed on 31 August 1997, killing himself, the princess and her lover Dodi Fayed. Now, Henri's father Jean Paul has made damning claims suggesting they were murdered by the establishment.

    An official inquest in 2008 ruled that the crash, which occurred in Paris' Alma Tunnel, was caused by the "gross negligence" of Henri, 41, who had alcohol in his system at the time of his death. However, his father is convinced the crash was no accident and even claims members of Scotland Yard told him about a "secret plot" to kill Princess Diana.

    Speaking at his home in Lorient, Brittany, Jean told The Mirror: "Inside Scotland Yard, some believe there was a secret plot to kill Diana. Diana was killed and my son was killed. I believe they were both murdered. My son was simply *collateral damage of a plot to kill Diana and they killed him as well. I am 100% sure he [Henri] was not involved in this plot. He was too honourable and too honest."

    The 85-year-old continued: "The English police came here to visit me and sat exactly where you are sitting now. Even inside Scotland Yard there are two sides. One believes there was a secret plot to kill Diana, the other believes it was a genuine accident. Even today there are too many classified secrets with this incident. I have no real hope to know what really happened. Perhaps it will be known in 30 or 50 years. But I would really like to know before I die. But I don't think it will happen."

    Jean argues that the claims his son had been drinking and was intoxicated at the time of the incident, are false, stating: "He was not an alcoholic. He was not a drug addict. That's just lies."

    He adds: "On that day there were over 20 autopsies that took place and it was easy for the authorities to switch blood samples to show alcohol was present in the sample they said was Henri's. That is what I believe happened."

    Delving deeper into his conspiracy theory, Jean continued: "It took them over an hour to get Princess Diana to hospital and that is when they made arrangements to make up the story about the Fiat Uno, the white car. It was a diversion and a decoy. This was just one of the many things that do not add up. For example I still cannot believe a street cleaning vehicle was going through the tunnel cleaning up just a few hours after the accident. That is shocking."

    Jean's comments come just weeks before the nation marks the 20th anniversary of Diana, Henri and Fayed's deaths.
    "There are three sorts of conspiracy: by the people who complain, by the people who write, by the people who take action. There is nothing to fear from the first group, the two others are more dangerous; but the police have to be part of all three,"

    Joseph Fouche

  10. Default

    I have a couple of Morgan's books on Kindle, and they're excellent. The intelligence figure he named as having run the plot in Paris to kill Diana was later made the UK Ambassador to Israel in September 2001, quite the month for it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •