Quote:Me, I keep thinking of the amazing advances in robot technology and wonder why? Once properly functioning, who needs hundreds of millions/billions of minion humans / "useless eaters" to service the new paradise?
God forbid my imagination...
Especially after life extension technology is advanced in some as yet unimagined ways. Then that new paradise will populated by new human -- a more godlike human.
Sure is starting to take on LIHOP characteristics, which I think the attacks back in January also fell into, at a minimum. The height of cynical political gamesmanship and manipulation of the People and the depths of democracy and lawful use of state power - internally and externally.
One attacker is now said to be in custody alive. One attacker is now identified as having come with the refugee flood through Greece earlier this year - Whether true or not, this will certainly do much to shut the door on all other refugees only wanting to find a safe haven from war that France and most of the other Western powers have fomented as the new form of colonialism. Norway changed its policy toward refugees in the last 48 hours. ISIL and Boko Haram et al. are horrors, and do horrible things, but they seem to me to have been created, fomented and allowed to exist by the very entities that are now screaming about a major war against them. This is the oldest game plan in the World for control of the People and resources.
Nafeez Ahmed wrote the piece "
No Piers Morgan. This is how to destroy the Islamic State," which states:
Quote:"Uncontrollable rage and ritual denunciations are not going to defeat IS. To defeat IS, we need to recognize that this Frankenstein's monster is neither simply a fault of 'the West,' nor of 'the Muslims.' It is a co-creation of the Western and Muslim worlds, specifically of Western and Muslim 'security' agencies who have lost all moral compass in the pursuit of geopolitical prowess, self-aggrandizement and corporate profiteering. Citizens of all faiths and none must stand together in solidarity to reject the violence perpetrated in our name on all sides."
NATO get to go into Syria now to bomb Assad under the pretext of bombing ISIS....and also confront Russia at the same time
A neocons wet dream...
Danny Jarman Wrote:NATO get to go into Syria now to bomb Assad under the pretext of bombing ISIS....and also confront Russia at the same time
A neocons wet dream...
If this does indeed transpire, then the purpose will be to confront Russia. That's the fear. That's the danger.
That the Neocons would consider potentially triggering a world war to keep their empire is unthinkable. And I'm hoping it doesn't go that far.
Obama now has to show his mettle and stand tall to resist the path laid out before him by the Neocon bureaucrats who control Washington.
It's a sick, narcissistic death cult but we will defeat them, writes The Mad Turk
The Blackshirt on Sunday, 15 November 2015
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...hnson.html
Quote:This was not just an attack on innocent life. It was an attack on my prospects for Number 10. And as such, when I look at the images from Paris, I feel not just grief and shock. I feel a deep and abiding sense of rage. So much so, that I have tasked not one, but two tame reptiles to cobble together this nonsense, in a desperate attempt to cover my candidacy in more Gallic blood than Gideon can.
When the Islamist killers opened fire, they killed and maimed people who were entirely guilty of voting in huge numbers for the tyrant Assad. That was in Syria, however, and therefore admirable, particularly when they dressed the Christian ones up in orange boiler suits and sliced their heads off.
But now these lunatics have turned up in Paris, presumably in the guise of burka-clad women, shooting masses of Froggies with Russian weaponry, arms no doubt freshly prized from the hands of the thousands of dead Siberian privates on the approaches to Aleppo and Mariupol, and flinging their passports at the feet of their victims like ghoulish, if obligingly revealing, calling cards. This is not admirable, for reasons so hypocritical and dishonest that I shall now attempt to distract you from considering the matter with successive paragraphs of emotive, irrelevant drivel.
They murdered and maimed men and women who have had absolutely nothing to do with Western policy in Iraq or Syria and who may well have been either kept entirely in the dark as to the true nature of the policies of President Francois Pushover, or indeed have known something about them, and therefore disapproved of them. Some of this latter group perhaps had it coming to them, as most of them are likely Trots and queers.
They killed scores of people who were simply out for a night of fun and entertainment and we are entitled to ask, if only to fill space and continue the distraction, why. Why then? Why there?
Why did they come at night, and to those venues?
They chose darkness not just because they hoped for concealment, but because it is then in the evening that the City of Garlic is famously at its most aromatic and beguiling. They attacked the crowds at a football match, at a rock concert, and in bars and restaurants and in the streets.
It was a vicious and premeditated onslaught on the very nightlife of Paris. And in attacking the nocturnal culture of this glorious European city, the pansy capital of the world for generations of Brits, the Islamist killers were signalling their contempt for exactly those things that make Frog Central great.
These bars and clubs that they machine-gunned what are they? They are places where men can come and meet prostitutes, bonk their secretaries, eat strange foods, drink Absinthe and go blind, laugh like donkeys, consume vast quantities of illegal narcotics, dance, sometimes even with women openly, without embarrassment, without being asked to cover their faces, as if current Chancellors of the Exchequer on a night out with a black, possibly Muslim, dominatrix.
They are places where people may hold hands in public, kiss in public without recrimination, reprisals, or indeed, as I have previously noted if only to keep shire Tories on-side, women. They are the places that epitomise our Western culture, of democratic freedom, and tolerance, and equality between the sexes, where a day's hard work enforcing tyrannical and insane Euroland laws which kill business, manipulating the common agriculture policy grant system, or, if les flics, beating Arabs senseless for fun, is followed by a little gentle fisting at the city's numerous S&M clubs.
It is that culture that is rejected by the Islamists in virtually all its aspects. Where we see personal happiness and fulfilment, they see behaviour that is somehow shameful or distasteful. Where we see civilisation, even in the parody that is the Eurozone version of it, they see something they wish to destroy. As they do, of course, and quite rightly, in the case of secular Damascus, which is Sodom and Gomorrah and deserves everything it gets.
Remember that the killers are explicitly the followers of the so-called Islamic State of Langley. These are people who behead not just Christians and Yazidis, but left-wing Democrats and other Americans who dissent from their interpretation of the good book of Dulles.
The followers of what I can only characterise as an Islamic Gideon murder women who are accused of adultery. They throw gays off cliffs, or out of the windows of the Exchequer. To call them medieval is an insult to the relative moderation of the Middle Ages of Brown.
There can be no compromise with this twisted ideology, no room for common ground because their ambition is so wholly nihilistic: to stop me from getting into 10 Downing Street.
They want to spread fear, and paranoia, not least about my alleged Turkish background, and neo-Ottoman sexual practices. They want to divide a handsome Mayor of London from the electorate and above all they want to divide metrosexual Tories (who run Central Office) from the yeoman queer-bashers of the suburbs and shires; and therefore it is utterly vital that we remember again that these people do not represent Conservative Party members, they do not speak for Conservative Party members, and that they are rejected and despised by the overwhelming majority of Conservative Party members. They belong to a sick, pathetic and very often narcissistic death cult. But enough of the Treasury and its leader, Gideon the misnamed.
As President Pushover rightly said yesterday, we must all do whatever the American deep state tells us. And that is because, in the end, grovelling subservience to its ideology offers the only real hope of me getting into Number 10. That is why I visited Israel and assiduously ignored mounds of dead Palestinian children.
Londoners regard Paris as our sister city, a place for which we have deep reserves of love and admiration and respect, except when we play them at any kind of sport, consider their loathsome personal hygiene, or listen to them droning on about art. But for the purposes of rescuing our Syrian pipeline plans from the clutches of Boris, we are both great capitals that stand for so much that is good about our shared desperation.
Twice in the last 100 years we have fought the Krauts for control of Paris. We stand side-by-side with the French today, in a struggle that embraces us all but never fear, we'll stab them in the back at the next available opportunity, the cheese-eating surrender-monkeys.
Caution: The following report is from The Guardian, the notorious CIA-mouthpiece
France funding Syrian rebels in new push to oust Assad
Money delivered by French government proxies across Turkish border has been used to buy weapons and ammunition
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/de...ian-rebels
Quote:France has emerged as the most prominent backer of Syria's armed opposition and is now directly funding rebel groups around Aleppo as part of a new push to oust the embattled Assad regime.
Large sums of cash have been delivered by French government proxies across the Turkish border to rebel commanders in the past month, diplomatic sources have confirmed. The money has been used to buy weapons inside Syria and to fund armed operations against loyalist forces.
The French moves have stopped short of direct supply of weapons a bridge that no western state has yet been willing to cross in Syria. But, according to western and Turkish officials as well as rebel leaders, the influx of money has made a difference in recent weeks as momentum on the battlefields of the north steadily shifts towards the opposition.
Some of the French cash has reached Islamist groups who were desperately short of ammunition and who had increasingly turned for help towards al-Qaida aligned jihadist groups in and around Aleppo.
One such group, Liwa al-Tawhid, an 8,000-strong militia that fights under the Free Syria Army banner, said it had been able to buy ammunition for the first time since late in the summer, a development that would help it resume military operations without the support of implacable jihadi organisations, such as Jabhat al-Nusra, which is now playing a lead role in northern Syria.
The French newspaper le Figaro reported this week that French military advisers had recently met with rebel groups inside Syria, in an area between Lebanon and Damascus, in further evidence of efforts by Paris to step up pressure on president Assad.
France has suggested that rebels should be given "defensive weapons" to use against the regime and was the first country to recognise a recalibrated political body as the legitimate voice of he Syrian people.
France has given a steady flow of humanitarian aid in recent months, including funds to rebel-held parts of Syria so that these "liberated zones" could begin to restore infrastructure and services for civilians. In September, the French defence minister stressed France was not providing weapons.
Foreign Secretary William Hague has added impetus to the new push to arm the opposition, again suggesting Britain would support moves to lift an arms embargo on the rebels.
A flurry of diplomatic moves this week, after months of political torpor, appear to have revitalised opposition efforts throughout Syria. The frantic diplomacy has been driven by fears that Syrian officials might use their stocks of chemical weapons as a last resort on battlefields that are no longer under their control.
A rebel siege of Damascus has now entered its second week. And although loyalist army divisions appear at no immediate risk of losing the capital, military units elsewhere in the country have lost influence over large swathes of land and are under increasing pressure over supply lines.
Rebels have been under pressure from the US, Britain, France and Turkey to fight under a joint command and control structure rather than as an assortment of militias, which often work at cross purposes.
At a meeting in Istanbul on Friday, commanders of the Free Syria Army more of a brand than a fighting force throughout the civil war agreed to establish a 30-member unified leadership.
After 21 months of crumbling state control in Syria, western diplomats in Ankara and elsewhere in the Arab world appear to be shifting their thinking from trying to manage the consequences to planning the future course.
"Assad won't be here next December," a senior Turkish official predicted. "Even the Russians have moderated on this. When we used to talk to them about Assad going, it was point-blank refusal. Now they are looking for common ground and wanting to exchange ideas."
The official said the US has also recently stepped up its efforts to oust Assad, but was not yet talking about arming the opposition and was refusing to deal with Islamist groups, such as Liwa al-Tawhid.
"What has happened with Jabhat al-Nusra (gaining influence), I would say is a product of (US) attitudes," he said. "They have a template by which they operate. And if a group fits perfectly into that, well that's fine. And if they don't it's a problem for them.
"Some of these groups have been forced to pretend that they are jihadists in order to get what they want."
US officials this week said that Turkey, for its part, was not prepared to directly lead the international response to Syria and was expecting Washington to fill that void.
President Barack Obama's warning during the week to Assad not to use chemical weapons was seen as his most strident stance yet, but it signalled no shift from an official wariness of the opposition, which had become more pronounced as jihadist groups gained prominence around Aleppo from late in the summer.
Turkey also remains wary of a potential threat from chemical weapons. However, officials said they were not convinced that even cornered regime leaders would use them.
Ankara will soon to take delivery of several patriot missile batteries, along with 400 German troops who will operate them along the southern border with Syria.
Officials say the increased Nato presence in Turkey makes it likely that Turkish air space and military bases would be used in the event of a decision being made by the US to seize Syria's chemical weapons stockpiles.
"That would have to be dealt with through existing mechanisms of Nato," the official said. "There is now a framework in place."
Facebook posting from Miquel Puertas, Sunday, 15 November 2015
Quote:Cyberactivists of the not still well-known "Collective Utopia" contacted me this morning. They want to release a document that proves that the Paris terrorist massacre was already explained with detail in the Wikipedia BEFORE the attacks took place. They will prove that the IP of the author of the article in the wikipedia is 82.45.236.70 from Tunbridge Wells (Great Britain) that is a town where there is a clandestine outfit of former British agents who carried out black operations for MI5 and MI6 (British intelligence). The document will be released tonight. ‪#‎parismassacre‬.
https://www.facebook.com/mykolasalutis?fref=nf
Hollande admits arming Syrian rebels in breach of embargo - book
Published time: 6 May, 2015 12:32
Edited time: 6 May, 2015 13:06
http://on.rt.com/c0yd1x
Quote:The French president has admitted delivering weapons to the Syrian rebels during a period of EU embargo, a new book about to be published in France reveals.
The deliveries took place in 2012, before the embargo was canceled in May 2013, according to François Hollande's last year interview with journalist and writer Xavier Panon. "We began when we were certain they would end up in the right hands. For the lethal weapons it was our services who delivered them," Hollande told the writer, AFP reports.
Panon used the interview in his book "In the Corridors of French Diplomacy" which comes out in France this month.
According to Hollande, as cited by Panon, France delivered cannons, machine guns, rocket launchers and anti-tank missiles to the forces fighting Bashar Al-Assad in the protracted Syrian civil war. Earlier, Hollande maintained France only sent weapons to Syria after the embargo was lifted.
In an interview with France 2 TV, President Assad accused France of supporting the same terrorists who carried out attacks in Paris: "Is it democratic to send weapons to terrorists and to support them? So I have the right to support the terrorists who attacked Charlie Hebdo, for example?" he added.
Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov has accused the West of covertly backing extremists to topple the Syrian regime. "Russia condemns the use of extremist groups in efforts to change the regime," he said at a November news conference.
Xavier Panon's "In the Corridors of French Diplomacy" also describes the French government's attack plans for Syria. These included airstrikes against the Syrian regime for its alleged use of chemical weapons in August 2013. One of the targets was a Syrian army intelligence headquarters the French deemed responsible for chemical weapons. These plans never went forward due to lack of support from Washington.
A French political adviser reportedly told Panon that the strikes had two objectives: to change the political order in Syria, and to destabilize Russia and pressure it to change its stance on the Syrian conflict.
The civil war in Syria, now in its fifth year, has claimed over 220,000 lives and displaced millions of Syrians to neighboring countries. Apart from the continuing conflict between the rebels and Bashar Assad's forces, several Islamist groups have used the chaos to try and gain ground in Syria. The Islamic State, the Free Syrian Army and the Islamic Front are in constant skirmishes with the government forces and each other over control of strategic locations.
President Pushover should be indicted for treason and supporting terrorism.
Paul Rigby Wrote:It's a sick, narcissistic death cult but we will defeat them, writes The Mad Turk
The Blackshirt on Sunday, 15 November 2015
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...hnson.html
Quote:This was not just an attack on innocent life. It was an attack on my prospects for Number 10. And as such, when I look at the images from Paris, I feel not just grief and shock. I feel a deep and abiding sense of rage. So much so, that I have tasked not one, but two tame reptiles to cobble together this nonsense, in a desperate attempt to cover my candidacy in more Gallic blood than Gideon can.
When the Islamist killers opened fire, they killed and maimed people who were entirely guilty of voting in huge numbers for the tyrant Assad. That was in Syria, however, and therefore admirable, particularly when they dressed the Christian ones up in orange boiler suits and sliced their heads off.
But now these lunatics have turned up in Paris, presumably in the guise of burka-clad women, shooting masses of Froggies with Russian weaponry, arms no doubt freshly prized from the hands of the thousands of dead Siberian privates on the approaches to Aleppo and Mariupol, and flinging their passports at the feet of their victims like ghoulish, if obligingly revealing, calling cards. This is not admirable, for reasons so hypocritical and dishonest that I shall now attempt to distract you from considering the matter with successive paragraphs of emotive, irrelevant drivel.
They murdered and maimed men and women who have had absolutely nothing to do with Western policy in Iraq or Syria and who may well have been either kept entirely in the dark as to the true nature of the policies of President Francois Pushover, or indeed have known something about them, and therefore disapproved of them. Some of this latter group perhaps had it coming to them, as most of them are likely Trots and queers.
They killed scores of people who were simply out for a night of fun and entertainment and we are entitled to ask, if only to fill space and continue the distraction, why. Why then? Why there?
Why did they come at night, and to those venues?
They chose darkness not just because they hoped for concealment, but because it is then in the evening that the City of Garlic is famously at its most aromatic and beguiling. They attacked the crowds at a football match, at a rock concert, and in bars and restaurants and in the streets.
It was a vicious and premeditated onslaught on the very nightlife of Paris. And in attacking the nocturnal culture of this glorious European city, the pansy capital of the world for generations of Brits, the Islamist killers were signalling their contempt for exactly those things that make Frog Central great.
These bars and clubs that they machine-gunned what are they? They are places where men can come and meet prostitutes, bonk their secretaries, eat strange foods, drink Absinthe and go blind, laugh like donkeys, consume vast quantities of illegal narcotics, dance, sometimes even with women openly, without embarrassment, without being asked to cover their faces, as if current Chancellors of the Exchequer on a night out with a black, possibly Muslim, dominatrix.
They are places where people may hold hands in public, kiss in public without recrimination, reprisals, or indeed, as I have previously noted if only to keep shire Tories on-side, women. They are the places that epitomise our Western culture, of democratic freedom, and tolerance, and equality between the sexes, where a day's hard work enforcing tyrannical and insane Euroland laws which kill business, manipulating the common agriculture policy grant system, or, if les flics, beating Arabs senseless for fun, is followed by a little gentle fisting at the city's numerous S&M clubs.
It is that culture that is rejected by the Islamists in virtually all its aspects. Where we see personal happiness and fulfilment, they see behaviour that is somehow shameful or distasteful. Where we see civilisation, even in the parody that is the Eurozone version of it, they see something they wish to destroy. As they do, of course, and quite rightly, in the case of secular Damascus, which is Sodom and Gomorrah and deserves everything it gets.
Remember that the killers are explicitly the followers of the so-called Islamic State of Langley. These are people who behead not just Christians and Yazidis, but left-wing Democrats and other Americans who dissent from their interpretation of the good book of Dulles.
The followers of what I can only characterise as an Islamic Gideon murder women who are accused of adultery. They throw gays off cliffs, or out of the windows of the Exchequer. To call them medieval is an insult to the relative moderation of the Middle Ages of Brown.
There can be no compromise with this twisted ideology, no room for common ground because their ambition is so wholly nihilistic: to stop me from getting into 10 Downing Street.
They want to spread fear, and paranoia, not least about my alleged Turkish background, and neo-Ottoman sexual practices. They want to divide a handsome Mayor of London from the electorate and above all they want to divide metrosexual Tories (who run Central Office) from the yeoman queer-bashers of the suburbs and shires; and therefore it is utterly vital that we remember again that these people do not represent Conservative Party members, they do not speak for Conservative Party members, and that they are rejected and despised by the overwhelming majority of Conservative Party members. They belong to a sick, pathetic and very often narcissistic death cult. But enough of the Treasury and its leader, Gideon the misnamed.
As President Pushover rightly said yesterday, we must all do whatever the American deep state tells us. And that is because, in the end, grovelling subservience to its ideology offers the only real hope of me getting into Number 10. That is why I visited Israel and assiduously ignored mounds of dead Palestinian children.
Londoners regard Paris as our sister city, a place for which we have deep reserves of love and admiration and respect, except when we play them at any kind of sport, consider their loathsome personal hygiene, or listen to them droning on about art. But for the purposes of rescuing our Syrian pipeline plans from the clutches of Boris, we are both great capitals that stand for so much that is good about our shared desperation.
Twice in the last 100 years we have fought the Krauts for control of Paris. We stand side-by-side with the French today, in a struggle that embraces us all but never fear, we'll stab them in the back at the next available opportunity, the cheese-eating surrender-monkeys.
What a compelling and sensible article.
I hear Murdoch wants Boris to be the anchor in the new Fox News S & M show to be called Muslim Crisis Roundup: Beat Me Silly, Please.
Here he is practising the role while hanging out his washing.
![[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=7733&stc=1]](https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=7733&stc=1)
I'm told his inspiration came from uncle Max Mosley.
David Guyatt Wrote:Paul Rigby Wrote:It's a sick, narcissistic death cult but we will defeat them, writes The Mad Turk
The Blackshirt on Sunday, 15 November 2015
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...hnson.html
Quote:This was not just an attack on innocent life. It was an attack on my prospects for Number 10. And as such, when I look at the images from Paris, I feel not just grief and shock. I feel a deep and abiding sense of rage. So much so, that I have tasked not one, but two tame reptiles to cobble together this nonsense, in a desperate attempt to cover my candidacy in more Gallic blood than Gideon can.
When the Islamist killers opened fire, they killed and maimed people who were entirely guilty of voting in huge numbers for the tyrant Assad. That was in Syria, however, and therefore admirable, particularly when they dressed the Christian ones up in orange boiler suits and sliced their heads off.
But now these lunatics have turned up in Paris, presumably in the guise of burka-clad women, shooting masses of Froggies with Russian weaponry, arms no doubt freshly prized from the hands of the thousands of dead Siberian privates on the approaches to Aleppo and Mariupol, and flinging their passports at the feet of their victims like ghoulish, if obligingly revealing, calling cards. This is not admirable, for reasons so hypocritical and dishonest that I shall now attempt to distract you from considering the matter with successive paragraphs of emotive, irrelevant drivel.
They murdered and maimed men and women who have had absolutely nothing to do with Western policy in Iraq or Syria and who may well have been either kept entirely in the dark as to the true nature of the policies of President Francois Pushover, or indeed have known something about them, and therefore disapproved of them. Some of this latter group perhaps had it coming to them, as most of them are likely Trots and queers.
They killed scores of people who were simply out for a night of fun and entertainment and we are entitled to ask, if only to fill space and continue the distraction, why. Why then? Why there?
Why did they come at night, and to those venues?
They chose darkness not just because they hoped for concealment, but because it is then in the evening that the City of Garlic is famously at its most aromatic and beguiling. They attacked the crowds at a football match, at a rock concert, and in bars and restaurants and in the streets.
It was a vicious and premeditated onslaught on the very nightlife of Paris. And in attacking the nocturnal culture of this glorious European city, the pansy capital of the world for generations of Brits, the Islamist killers were signalling their contempt for exactly those things that make Frog Central great.
These bars and clubs that they machine-gunned what are they? They are places where men can come and meet prostitutes, bonk their secretaries, eat strange foods, drink Absinthe and go blind, laugh like donkeys, consume vast quantities of illegal narcotics, dance, sometimes even with women openly, without embarrassment, without being asked to cover their faces, as if current Chancellors of the Exchequer on a night out with a black, possibly Muslim, dominatrix.
They are places where people may hold hands in public, kiss in public without recrimination, reprisals, or indeed, as I have previously noted if only to keep shire Tories on-side, women. They are the places that epitomise our Western culture, of democratic freedom, and tolerance, and equality between the sexes, where a day's hard work enforcing tyrannical and insane Euroland laws which kill business, manipulating the common agriculture policy grant system, or, if les flics, beating Arabs senseless for fun, is followed by a little gentle fisting at the city's numerous S&M clubs.
It is that culture that is rejected by the Islamists in virtually all its aspects. Where we see personal happiness and fulfilment, they see behaviour that is somehow shameful or distasteful. Where we see civilisation, even in the parody that is the Eurozone version of it, they see something they wish to destroy. As they do, of course, and quite rightly, in the case of secular Damascus, which is Sodom and Gomorrah and deserves everything it gets.
Remember that the killers are explicitly the followers of the so-called Islamic State of Langley. These are people who behead not just Christians and Yazidis, but left-wing Democrats and other Americans who dissent from their interpretation of the good book of Dulles.
The followers of what I can only characterise as an Islamic Gideon murder women who are accused of adultery. They throw gays off cliffs, or out of the windows of the Exchequer. To call them medieval is an insult to the relative moderation of the Middle Ages of Brown.
There can be no compromise with this twisted ideology, no room for common ground because their ambition is so wholly nihilistic: to stop me from getting into 10 Downing Street.
They want to spread fear, and paranoia, not least about my alleged Turkish background, and neo-Ottoman sexual practices. They want to divide a handsome Mayor of London from the electorate and above all they want to divide metrosexual Tories (who run Central Office) from the yeoman queer-bashers of the suburbs and shires; and therefore it is utterly vital that we remember again that these people do not represent Conservative Party members, they do not speak for Conservative Party members, and that they are rejected and despised by the overwhelming majority of Conservative Party members. They belong to a sick, pathetic and very often narcissistic death cult. But enough of the Treasury and its leader, Gideon the misnamed.
As President Pushover rightly said yesterday, we must all do whatever the American deep state tells us. And that is because, in the end, grovelling subservience to its ideology offers the only real hope of me getting into Number 10. That is why I visited Israel and assiduously ignored mounds of dead Palestinian children.
Londoners regard Paris as our sister city, a place for which we have deep reserves of love and admiration and respect, except when we play them at any kind of sport, consider their loathsome personal hygiene, or listen to them droning on about art. But for the purposes of rescuing our Syrian pipeline plans from the clutches of Boris, we are both great capitals that stand for so much that is good about our shared desperation.
Twice in the last 100 years we have fought the Krauts for control of Paris. We stand side-by-side with the French today, in a struggle that embraces us all but never fear, we'll stab them in the back at the next available opportunity, the cheese-eating surrender-monkeys.
What a compelling and sensible article.
I hear Murdoch wants Boris to be the anchor in the new Fox News S & M show to be called Muslim Crisis Roundup: Beat Me Silly, Please.
Here he is practising the role while hanging out his washing.
I'm told his inspiration came from uncle Max Mosley.
Eins, zwei, drei, vier...good Lord, I've lost count of the number of nipple clamps.
On the upside, rarely has the relationship between US and French intelligence been more harrowingly captured. The gimp is, of course, the head of French intelligence; and the charmer in the shades, the Paris CIA station chief.