Richard Gilbride Wrote:Don Jefferies, post #7: "I didn't agree with Doyle all that often, but like Parker or Farley or anyone else I may disagree with, I support his right to be heard."
Ditto.
Doyle has been unfairly targeted with a nightmare of abuse ever since he correctly discerned that the PrayerMan figure is at the front of the TSBD landing- and therefore cannot be Lee Harvey Oswald, since he's a full head shorter than Wesley Frazier.
This is a scientific certainty, which 90% of forum members don't process.
And the moderators here want to ban Doyle, since he vented some anger on his Facebook page? Is he supposed to be a doormat? And always act like Mother Theresa?
This spring, God willing, I will obtain a digital scan of the Darnell film, and eradicate this PrayerMan nonsense for keeps.
And those who have called for Doyle's removal will resemble the lunatic tribe in Lord of the Flies.
We are done with Doyle. This thread is about David, who I am glad has been posting again at EF.
DiEugenio: "What would not be OK with Rich? Maybe if he and Doyle hacked this site or maybe ROKC? All in the unbelievable Richard the LionHearted Crusade to preserve the lunchroom encounter and dismantle PM from the face of the earth?"
DiEugenio's rationale that the lunchroom incident was hoaxed is that Spence was sloppy, therefore Baker lied. Hey, he even interviewed Spence. So Jim interviewed Spence, therefore Baker lied. And he paints me as a Crusader in his attempt to cheapen my hard-nosed scholarship that shredded Kamp's error-riddled essay, which Jim whole-hoggedly endorsed.
Dopey as it gets. And this guy pretends he's some kind of research community leader?
I had never seen Doyle's Facebook post. I don't participate in that Zuckerberg con. I work in construction and have a tougher skin than most. I have zero tolerance for profanity or radios. I don't see what is so despicable about Doyle's Facebook rant. If you want a taste of some genuine Clockwork Orange psychos, have a look at ROKC sometime. They've turned JFK research into a toilet bowl these past 4 years. They're all in favor of re-opening the Kennedy case, unless it would make them look like mental defects.
Doyle's banning is further fallout from the hero-worship of that narcissist, Sean (glug, glug, glug) Murphy- just another stupid drunkard who won't own up to the grief he's caused in this world.
Wow.
That is all I can say to the above.
And that will be it for me and the subject of Doyle.
Anything further posted on Doyle will be removed. This thread is NOT about him. This Forum is not about him. Basta!
Dawn Meredith Wrote:[quote=David Josephs]From my profile at the Ed Forum:
0 warning points
Restrictions being applied: Restricted from posting
Yes, I was given no warning, and have never had warning points...
While Mike Dub'ya and tommy G get to keep on doing the COINTELPRO schtick....
Just FWIW
DJ
WTF? I hardly ever go there but I stopped by yesterday and caught a couple of Feb posts from RCD- Tommy is not someone I agree with. An apologist for the CIA. IMHO
Dawn Meredith Wrote:[quote=David Josephs]From my profile at the Ed Forum:
0 warning points
Restrictions being applied: Restricted from posting
Yes, I was given no warning, and have never had warning points...
While Mike Dub'ya and tommy G get to keep on doing the COINTELPRO schtick....
Just FWIW
DJ
....................................