14 incredible facts about 9/11 - Printable Version +- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora) +-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: 911 (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-6.html) +--- Thread: 14 incredible facts about 9/11 (/thread-14057.html) Pages:
1
2
|
14 incredible facts about 9/11 - Tracy Riddle - 11-08-2015 [URL="http://911blogger.com/news/2015-08-08/fourteen-incredible-facts-about-911"]http://911blogger.com/news/2015-08-08/fourteen-incredible-facts-about-911 [/URL]Posted on August 8, 2015 by Kevin Ryan As the 14[SUP]th[/SUP] anniversary of 9/11 approaches, it's important to remind people that we still don't know what happened that day. What is known about 9/11 is that there are many incredible facts that continue to be ignored by the government and the mainstream media. Here are fourteen.
14 incredible facts about 9/11 - Peter Lemkin - 11-08-2015 Ryan is one of the best researchers in the field. I highly recommend his book Another 19, in which he names [more than] 19 real persons most likely to have been involved, along with the supporting evidence [footnoted] as to why! - and NOT the 19 patsies! If you believe the official version of 911 as being correct in anything other than the day it occurred [they did get that right!], IMHO, you will believe any lie the Deep Political Dybbyks (the men behind the curtain) dream up! Feel free to look at, or add to, our reading/watching/listening list on 911 here https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/showthread.php?13528-Best-critical-books-videos-articles-on-9-11&highlight=nineteen#.VcnpiR9h3mE 14 incredible facts about 9/11 - R.K. Locke - 13-08-2015 A new piece by James Perloff re: Flight 11: http://memoryholeblog.com/2015/08/13/unraveling-the-mysteries-of-flight-11/ 14 incredible facts about 9/11 - Peter Lemkin - 13-08-2015 R.K. Locke Wrote:A new piece by James Perloff re: Flight 11: Pretty good analysis. Read through it quickly once and most of it fit in with what I knew. A few new twists that have the feel of the possible - the scenario sketches. Well worth the time to read...twice. 14 incredible facts about 9/11 - Anthony Thorne - 14-08-2015 Peter, good piece and it fits very neatly with the Elias Davidsson book, which also argues at length that the flight crews likely felt they were taking part in a drill. I think any notion of 'crisis actors' being protected after the event is wishful thinking though. Plotters don't leave loose ends hanging. 14 incredible facts about 9/11 - Peter Lemkin - 14-08-2015 The 'confusion' [deliberate?] about the boarding gate is also another of many interesting features. Switched planes are usually thought of as being switched in flight [and there is reason to believe one or more such in-flight 'switch' took place...but it can be done at [before] take off too. The problem has always been to explain what was done with the 'people' said to have been on the 'flight'...and while this is a 'problem' to explain, it may not be an insurmountable problem. I don't plan to propose an answer...only do some thought experiments on that. It has long been noted that more than the usual number of defense/intelligence-related persons or their family members were on these flights and that planes were less full than would be expected statistically. While the hardest 'place' to go is the 'disposal' of the persons [they were in some way done away with], what if they needed or were rewarded to live on, but under new identities - perhaps even not in the US where they could be recognized. On the other hand, they could have been done away with...as 911 was a 'wet job' for sure...and what is a few more bodies to be done away with...even if they are from the same general side of the political team....it would not be the first time in history such was done. As for the switching of planes being possible in flight, it has long been noted that most of the 'hijacked planes' made their major diversion in direction at a radar blind spot, where clarity is minimal; ambiguity maximal - where two or more radar zones touch - and there would have to be a hand-off from one radar tracking zone to another. I believe there is quite a lot of detail on this on the 911 pilots for truth site, as well as elsewhere. I'll try to find some documentation. I'm always saddened that so many are interested in JFK's assassination [and related]; but seem uninterested or daunted by 911. Yes, it was more complex [by an order of magnitude], but it is just as false and impossible according to the official scenario; both were, IMO, done for very similar reasons, by very similar types and form a Deep Political pattern from WWII to the day after tomorrow and beyond. There are even certain 'features' and 'entities' used in both - patsies, false-trails, disaster actors, planted 'evidence', doubles, standard magic tricks, misdirection of attention, controlled 'investigations' with pre-planned conclusions, denial of documents and evidence, testimony taken without being sworn in, post-event elimination or threatening of witnesses and those in the know, media control and spin, diversion with wars, use of secret communication channels, use of intelligence/military/financially-to-gain operatives and scenario directors, cover simulations, issuance of false cover stories from on 'high', COG to name just a few. Both were only fig-leaf covered Coup d'etats further consolidating the power of the Secret/Deep State, diminishing the rights and freedoms of the general public, and the touchstone for wars. 14 incredible facts about 9/11 - Lauren Johnson - 14-08-2015 Quote:I'm always saddened that so many are interested in JFK's assassination [and related]; but seem uninterested or daunted by 911. Ain't that the truth! BTW, Ive never run into the idea that the crew members were acting roles in a macabre play to establish the 9/11 legend. 14 incredible facts about 9/11 - Anthony Thorne - 14-08-2015 I'd suggest that researchers who are curious who might have been in charge of the 'disposal' of those passengers, should cast a careful eye over which Bush admin sidekicks and helpers and enforcers were later in charge of or linked to Mossad hit squads targeting Iran scientists, Abu Ghraib and similar murderous spook-linked squads in Iraq. I'm sure there is a continuity there. Anyone with the mentality to take care of nasty business after 9/11, would have also had the same mindset in the weeks leading up to the event, and on the day itself. 14 incredible facts about 9/11 - Tracy Riddle - 14-08-2015 R.K. Locke Wrote:A new piece by James Perloff re: Flight 11: Very good article; thanks for posting. 14 incredible facts about 9/11 - Tracy Riddle - 14-08-2015 Peter Lemkin Wrote:I'm always saddened that so many are interested in JFK's assassination [and related]; but seem uninterested or daunted by 911. Yes, it was more complex [by an order of magnitude], but it is just as false and impossible according to the official scenario; both were, IMO, done for very similar reasons, by very similar types and form a Deep Political pattern from WWII to the day after tomorrow and beyond. There are even certain 'features' and 'entities' used in both - patsies, false-trails, disaster actors, planted 'evidence', doubles, standard magic tricks, misdirection of attention, controlled 'investigations' with pre-planned conclusions, denial of documents and evidence, testimony taken without being sworn in, post-event elimination or threatening of witnesses and those in the know, media control and spin, diversion with wars, use of secret communication channels, use of intelligence/military/financially-to-gain operatives and scenario directors, cover simulations, issuance of false cover stories from on 'high', COG to name just a few. Both were only fig-leaf covered Coup d'etats further consolidating the power of the Secret/Deep State, diminishing the rights and freedoms of the general public, and the touchstone for wars. And both are linked together by Operation Northwoods, which outlines the concept of a false flag to justify a war. Clearly that's what the JFK assassination was intended to be. |