14 incredible facts about 9/11

[Tracy Riddle]

[URL="http://911blogger.com/news/2015-08-08/fourteen-incredible-facts-about-911"]http://911blogger.com/news/2015-08-08/fourteen-incredible-facts-about-911

[/URL]Posted on August 8, 2015 by Kevin Ryan As the 14[SUP]th[/SUP] anniversary of 9/11 approaches, it's important to remind people that we still don't know what happened that day. What is known about 9/11 is that there are many incredible facts that continue to be ignored by the government and the mainstream media. Here are fourteen.

1. An outline of what was to become the 9/11 Commission Report was produced before the investigation began. The outline was kept secret from the Commission's staff and appears to have determined the outcome of the investigation.
   
2. The 9/11 Commission claimed sixty-three (63) times in its Report that it could find "no evidence" related to important aspects of the crimes.
   
3. One person, Shayna Steiger, issued 12 visas to the alleged hijackers in Saudi Arabia. Steiger issued some of the visas without interviewing the applicants and fought with another employee at the embassy who tried to prevent her lax approach.
   
4. Before 9/11, the nation's leading counter-terrorism expert repeatedly notified his friends in the United Arab Emirates of top-secret U.S. plans to capture Osama bin Laden. These treasonous leaks prevented Bin Laden's capture on at least two separate occasions.
   
5. Former National Security Advisor Sandy Berger was caught stealing documents from the National Archives that had been requested by the 9/11 Commission. The Commission had previously been denied access to the documents but the White House reluctantly agreed to turn them over just as Berger was trying to steal them..
   
6. The official story of the failed air defenses on 9/11 was changed several times and, in the end, paradoxically exonerated the military by saying that the military had lied many times about its response. The man who was behind several of the changing accounts was a specialist in political warfare (i.e. propaganda).
   
7. Military exercises being conducted on the day of 9/11 mimicked the attacks as they were occurring and obstructed the response to the attacks. NORAD commander Ralph Eberhart sponsored those exercises, failed to do his job that day, and later lied to Congress about it (if the 9/11 Commission account is true).
   
8. A third skyscraper collapsed late in the afternoon on 9/11. This was WTC 7, a 47-story building that the government's final report says fell into its own footprint due to office fires. The building's tenants included U.S. intelligence agencies and a company led in part by Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney. Meetings were scheduled there to discuss terrorism and explosives on the morning of 9/11.
   
9. News agencies, including BBC and CNN, announced the destruction of WTC 7 long before it happened. One BBC reporter announced the collapse while viewers could see the still-standing building right behind her in the video. Years later, after claiming that it had lost the tapes and then found them again, BBC's answer to this astonishing report was that everything was just "confusing and chaotic" that day. Of course, one problem with this is that the news agencies predicted the exact building, of the many damaged in the area, that would collapse. Another big problem is that no one could have possibly predicted the collapse of WTC 7 given the unprecedented and unbelievable official account for how that happened.
   
10. Construction of the new, 52-story WTC 7 was completed two years before the government knew what happened to the first WTC 7. In fact, when the new building was completed in 2006, the spokesman for the government investigation said, "We've had trouble getting a handle on building No. 7." The construction of the new building, without regard for how the first one was destroyed, indicates that building construction professionals in New York City did not believe it could ever happen again.
    
11. Ultimately, building construction codes were not changed as a result of the root causes cited by the National Institute for Standards and Technology for destruction of the World Trade Center (WTC) buildings. This fact shows that the international building construction community does not believe that the WTC buildings were destroyed as stated in the official account.
    
12. AMEC, the company that just finished rebuilding the exact spot where Flight 77 was said to hit, was put in charge of cleanup at the WTC and the Pentagon. The man who ran the company, Peter Janson, was a long-time business associate of Donald Rumsfeld.
    
13. The response of the U.S. Secret Service to the 9/11 attacks suggests foreknowledge of the events in that the agency failed to protect the president from the obvious danger posed by terrorists.
    
14. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission notified the FBI of suspected 9/11 insider trading transactions. That evidence was ignored and the suspects were not even questioned by the FBI or the 9/11 Commission.
    

There are, of course, many more incredible facts about 9/11 that continue to be ignored by authorities and much of the media. Let's hope that the next major terrorist attack results in legitimate reporting and unified calls for truth before fourteen years have passed.

[Peter Lemkin]

Ryan is one of the best researchers in the field. I highly recommend his book Another 19, in which he names [more than] 19 real persons most likely to have been involved, along with the supporting evidence [footnoted] as to why! - and NOT the 19 patsies! If you believe the official version of 911 as being correct in anything other than the day it occurred [they did get that right!], IMHO, you will believe any lie the Deep Political Dybbyks (the men behind the curtain) dream up!

Feel free to look at, or add to, our reading/watching/listening list on 911 here https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...cnpiR9h3mE

[R.K. Locke]

A new piece by James Perloff re: Flight 11:

http://memoryholeblog.com/2015/08/13/unr...flight-11/

[Peter Lemkin]

A new piece by James Perloff re: Flight 11:

http://memoryholeblog.com/2015/08/13/unr...flight-11/

Pretty good analysis. Read through it quickly once and most of it fit in with what I knew. A few new twists that have the feel of the possible - the scenario sketches. Well worth the time to read...twice.

[Anthony Thorne]

Peter, good piece and it fits very neatly with the Elias Davidsson book, which also argues at length that the flight crews likely felt they were taking part in a drill. I think any notion of 'crisis actors' being protected after the event is wishful thinking though. Plotters don't leave loose ends hanging.

[Peter Lemkin]

The 'confusion' [deliberate?] about the boarding gate is also another of many interesting features. Switched planes are usually thought of as being switched in flight [and there is reason to believe one or more such in-flight 'switch' took place...but it can be done at [before] take off too. The problem has always been to explain what was done with the 'people' said to have been on the 'flight'...and while this is a 'problem' to explain, it may not be an insurmountable problem. I don't plan to propose an answer...only do some thought experiments on that. It has long been noted that more than the usual number of defense/intelligence-related persons or their family members were on these flights and that planes were less full than would be expected statistically. While the hardest 'place' to go is the 'disposal' of the persons [they were in some way done away with], what if they needed or were rewarded to live on, but under new identities - perhaps even not in the US where they could be recognized. On the other hand, they could have been done away with...as 911 was a 'wet job' for sure...and what is a few more bodies to be done away with...even if they are from the same general side of the political team....it would not be the first time in history such was done. As for the switching of planes being possible in flight, it has long been noted that most of the 'hijacked planes' made their major diversion in direction at a radar blind spot, where clarity is minimal; ambiguity maximal - where two or more radar zones touch - and there would have to be a hand-off from one radar tracking zone to another. I believe there is quite a lot of detail on this on the 911 pilots for truth site, as well as elsewhere. I'll try to find some documentation.

I'm always saddened that so many are interested in JFK's assassination [and related]; but seem uninterested or daunted by 911. Yes, it was more complex [by an order of magnitude], but it is just as false and impossible according to the official scenario; both were, IMO, done for very similar reasons, by very similar types and form a Deep Political pattern from WWII to the day after tomorrow and beyond. There are even certain 'features' and 'entities' used in both - patsies, false-trails, disaster actors, planted 'evidence', doubles, standard magic tricks, misdirection of attention, controlled 'investigations' with pre-planned conclusions, denial of documents and evidence, testimony taken without being sworn in, post-event elimination or threatening of witnesses and those in the know, media control and spin, diversion with wars, use of secret communication channels, use of intelligence/military/financially-to-gain operatives and scenario directors, cover simulations, issuance of false cover stories from on 'high', COG to name just a few. Both were only fig-leaf covered Coup d'etats further consolidating the power of the Secret/Deep State, diminishing the rights and freedoms of the general public, and the touchstone for wars.

[Lauren Johnson]

I'm always saddened that so many are interested in JFK's assassination [and related]; but seem uninterested or daunted by 911.

Ain't that the truth! BTW, Ive never run into the idea that the crew members were acting roles in a macabre play to establish the 9/11 legend.

[Anthony Thorne]

I'd suggest that researchers who are curious who might have been in charge of the 'disposal' of those passengers, should cast a careful eye over which Bush admin sidekicks and helpers and enforcers were later in charge of or linked to Mossad hit squads targeting Iran scientists, Abu Ghraib and similar murderous spook-linked squads in Iraq. I'm sure there is a continuity there. Anyone with the mentality to take care of nasty business after 9/11, would have also had the same mindset in the weeks leading up to the event, and on the day itself.

[Tracy Riddle]

A new piece by James Perloff re: Flight 11:

http://memoryholeblog.com/2015/08/13/unr...flight-11/

Very good article; thanks for posting.

[Tracy Riddle]

I'm always saddened that so many are interested in JFK's assassination [and related]; but seem uninterested or daunted by 911. Yes, it was more complex [by an order of magnitude], but it is just as false and impossible according to the official scenario; both were, IMO, done for very similar reasons, by very similar types and form a Deep Political pattern from WWII to the day after tomorrow and beyond. There are even certain 'features' and 'entities' used in both - patsies, false-trails, disaster actors, planted 'evidence', doubles, standard magic tricks, misdirection of attention, controlled 'investigations' with pre-planned conclusions, denial of documents and evidence, testimony taken without being sworn in, post-event elimination or threatening of witnesses and those in the know, media control and spin, diversion with wars, use of secret communication channels, use of intelligence/military/financially-to-gain operatives and scenario directors, cover simulations, issuance of false cover stories from on 'high', COG to name just a few. Both were only fig-leaf covered Coup d'etats further consolidating the power of the Secret/Deep State, diminishing the rights and freedoms of the general public, and the touchstone for wars.

And both are linked together by Operation Northwoods, which outlines the concept of a false flag to justify a war. Clearly that's what the JFK assassination was intended to be.