+- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora)
+-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: Other (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-17.html)
+--- Thread: Just Was Removed By Walker On Other Forum (/thread-3254.html)
Just Was Removed By Walker On Other Forum - Bernice Moore - 16-03-2010
Thanks Peter perhaps it was not global, but i did read such, and i did wonder if you had, had any further thoughts to defending yourself, if on the EF, by any other means... take care b.
Just Was Removed By Walker On Other Forum - Bernice Moore - 16-03-2010
Peter this is in your letter posted on the EF that dr.jim posted from you..post # 44...b
Peter has asked this be posted:
I just went through about half of all of the 150 email exchanges I
had with her over a period of over 16 months. I'll stand 100% behind
my original and consistent statement - they were not anything even
close to 'problematic' for either - a mutual exchange; mostly
totally innocuous - with a few, for a short while, MUTUALLY
flirtatious for some months - end of it. This is all much ado about
nothing!! They do, however, contain personal information about both
persons and are not the stuff of public posting! So, I'd ask all
calls for postings from either side cease and desist - now! This
should have long ago, if needed be done in private. As I even asked
for this and was ignored by one Admin. and sent more venon by the
other, the chance was missed and NOT my doing! I would however,
mention that in one about six months into the exchange she says to me
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=15641&st=30
Just Was Removed By Walker On Other Forum - Dawn Meredith - 16-03-2010
In light of the fact that Peter can no longer defend himself at the Ed Forum I am asking publicly that John Simkin stop the smear campaign going on over there, now by the fanciful Daniel wayne Dunne (sp) (Never to be confused with the always brilliant Robert- Charles-Dunne). I see nothing to be gained by a continued smear on a person who is unable to defend himself. Unless the moderators are finding some sort of perverse pleasure in kicking someone who is already down.
AND here, let us cease from discussing that place. Perhaps then this mess will die down of its own accord.
Dawn
Just Was Removed By Walker On Other Forum - Bernice Moore - 16-03-2010
GOOD IDEAS DAWN ...IMO.....B:flowers:
Just Was Removed By Walker On Other Forum - Peter Lemkin - 16-03-2010
Bernice Moore Wrote:GOOD IDEAS DAWN ...IMO.....B:flowers:
With the exception that if now they are threatening to boot out anyone who posts my explanations/attempts at reply to all the **** being hurled at me - and you ask I and others not post here, that leaves me no venue to defend myself. Some of the info [mixed in with more than half measure of disinfo could only have come from AW - not any woman; the rest is invented or so spun as to be unrecognizable as even spun from a half or quarter truth into a lie]. I'd never noted the similarity almost parody of the two names you mentioned Dawn....maybe that was DONE on purpose by the lesser of the two. He seems to be working as a 'plumber' [Nixon variety] for AW now. Oh, and one hateful mod over there is still sending what I'd almost consider hate emails. Some really malevolent people over there.
Just Was Removed By Walker On Other Forum - Peter Lemkin - 16-03-2010
Note should be made that the very mod who is threatening those who post to allow me to explain/correct/defend against the false allegations [after my silencing for no crimes], only speaking the truth, is also sending me a series of unwanted emails to annoy and heckle me. He also posted a very nasty post against me... So some mods are allowed to do things slightly off the 'mark' [as long as they follow the AW party line, but I could do no 'right', for not following the AW party line]. After thinking about it, I believe 'Dunn' is either posting messages sent by AW or is a false avatar cover for AW when he doesn't want to post under his real name. Some of the information in that cruel, mostly wrong, and slanderous post could only have been known by AW. Further I believe the 'Dunn' name is likely a faux entity and silent attack/slight on the great member/poster Robert Charles-Dunne. AW apparently has his own Nixon-like 'plumbers' crew, including real and fictive members. The fig leaves are falling....the EF stands naked.
Just Was Removed By Walker On Other Forum - David Healy - 16-03-2010
Peter Lemkin Wrote:Note should be made that the very mod who is threatening those who post to allow me to explain/correct/defend against the false allegations [after my silencing for no crimes], only speaking the truth, is also sending me a series of unwanted emails to annoy and heckle me. He also posted a very nasty post against me... So some mods are allowed to do things slightly off the 'mark' [as long as they follow the AW party line, but I could do no 'right', for not following the AW party line]. After thinking about it, I believe 'Dunn' is either posting messages sent by AW or is a false avatar cover for AW when he doesn't want to post under his real name. Some of the information in that cruel, mostly wrong, and slanderous post could only have been known by AW. Further I believe the 'Dunn' name is likely a faux entity and silent attack/slight on the great member/poster Robert Charles-Dunne. AW apparently has his own Nixon-like 'plumbers' crew, including real and fictive members. The fig leaves are falling....the EF stands naked.
Mr. 9 Iron has been exposed... and heaven forbid, lone nut, faux name alias(es)? LMFAO! We've been exposing those trolls for 5 years on the old USENET board (now Google) alt.conspiracy.jfk (acj) forum.... some of the trolls have as many as 6 separate aliases posting at the same time... some single lone nut alias(es) are a composite of 5-10 different posters funneled through one poster....
I expect the JFK assassination side of Ed Forum side will close down sooner, rather than later (Whatever happens the Spatacus reference material needs to be preserved, the same for Rich DellaRosa's on-line JFK material [I'm aware that RD's JFKResearch forum will continue]).... The current .john mcadams lone nut contingent KNOWS it's losing the conspiracy PR battle.... so good, solid research and presentation of same is the key dealing with them...
So far as the Ed Forum is concerned... IMHO, they'd like nothing better than a pissing match with DPF... Their numbers were down (way down) until this recent bruhaha... So, there's a time and a place for everything. If the powers that be at EF want to piss and moan, suggest they nad up and do battle at alt.conspiracy.jfk! And it isn't pretty... Have them bring their knowledge and support of the WCR evidence, testimony, exhibits, case films and pictures. Let them take on the 45 WCR related questions as presented by Ben Holmes. The same questions that recently made .john mcadams run back to his his moderated alt.assassination.jfk. lair.
aside: not ONE lone-nut/SBT/LHO did it all by his lonesome supporter has been able to answer one of the 45 questions sufficiently. Not ONE question. And that is after 5 rounds and 4+ years of attempts....
To add insult to injury, then have the trolls move onto the 50+ questions as presented by Gil Jesus....
So here's how I feel concerning lone nut trolls, they can kiss my royal red... :reddy:
p.s. and after 10 years they still can't find a professional to dispute my Zapruder Film, What IF analysis...
Just Was Removed By Walker On Other Forum - David Guyatt - 16-03-2010
David Healy Wrote:So far as the Ed Forum is concerned... IMHO, they'd like nothing better than a pissing match with DPF... Their numbers were down (way down) until this recent bruhaha... So, there's a time and a place for everything.
Interesting David. It makes commercial sense too.
Got to keep that advertising revenue dinging away eh. It also seems to resemble the TV programme Big Brother - foul, stupid and demeaning, but apparently calculated by the producers to keep audience figures high. I wonder if any of the trolls get a percentage of the purse?
I recommend everyone stay away from that place starting now. I intend to.
Just Was Removed By Walker On Other Forum - David Starks - 16-03-2010
Hello Peter,
I heard about this on FaceBook. I am sorry for what happened to you. It seems you have been vidicated and are owed an apology or a retraction (which will not happen I assume). The good thing is they disrupted themselves as much as you, since the nature of the situation has resulted in less posts and has damaged them, their forum and their credibility in terms of "fairness". I hope all your 5000+ posts are recovered. I expect there may be a pro bono barrister who may take this on for you - if you look. You have a record of this defamation and deserve compensation. Good luck!
Just Was Removed By Walker On Other Forum - Peter Lemkin - 16-03-2010
David Starks Wrote:Hello Peter,
I heard about this on FaceBook. I am sorry for what happened to you. It seems you have been vidicated and are owed an apology or a retraction (which will not happen I assume). The good thing is they disrupted themselves as much as you, since the nature of the situation has resulted in less posts and has damaged them, their forum and their credibility in terms of "fairness". I hope all your 5000+ posts are recovered. I expect there may be a pro bono barrister who may take this on for you - if you look. You have a record of this defamation and deserve compensation. Good luck!
Thanks. Facebook! Oh my, wonder who started that...I don't even use that.....:joyman: My, my, the paratroopers are now coming in via Facebook - just at the last moment....where is Patton, the ground troops and the tanks?! I hope not far behind!....and which reminds me...of yet another outpouring of my research 'disappeared' over there...about the murder of Gen. G. Patton by forces from our 'side' in WW2 - because he knew too much of the secret end to that conflict [Kammler and all that 'stuff'.....and would have been a 'problem' in the post-War era...the post War era than never was to be...in the 'We never stood down - and no one can make us' era we find ourselves in today.