Bob Prudhomme Wrote:Hi James

I agree with you, the matter of Chaney passing the limo, in order to alert Curry in the lead car, is an important puzzle that simply will not go away.

However, I have found that merely mentioning this matter on JFK forums is enough to draw instant ridicule, despite the indisputable fact that so many high ranking officials testified to the fact that Chaney arrived with the news at the lead car well before the limo arrived there. I believe the reason for this is that the possibilities this raises simply stagger the imagination of the average man. If Chaney actually did pass the limo, there are a great number of films and photos that had to be altered to conceal this fact.

That being said, there remains people, like you and I, who simply cannot dismiss a possibility because of its outrageousness. This means we also accept the limo stop and the large back of head wound despite evidence to the contrary, simply because too many witnesses reported these same things and were virtually unanimous in their descriptions.

As Sir Arthur Conan Doyle so aptly said, "When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth".

Albert Doyle Wrote:

Bob Prudhomme Wrote:Hi James

I agree with you, the matter of Chaney passing the limo, in order to alert Curry in the lead car, is an important puzzle that simply will not go away.

However, I have found that merely mentioning this matter on JFK forums is enough to draw instant ridicule, despite the indisputable fact that so many high ranking officials testified to the fact that Chaney arrived with the news at the lead car well before the limo arrived there. I believe the reason for this is that the possibilities this raises simply stagger the imagination of the average man. If Chaney actually did pass the limo, there are a great number of films and photos that had to be altered to conceal this fact.

That being said, there remains people, like you and I, who simply cannot dismiss a possibility because of its outrageousness. This means we also accept the limo stop and the large back of head wound despite evidence to the contrary, simply because too many witnesses reported these same things and were virtually unanimous in their descriptions.

As Sir Arthur Conan Doyle so aptly said, "When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth".

Hey, I don't necessarily disagree with this. Chaney could be shooting forward because Greer is applying the brakes. Chaney could have kept his gaze on JFK after Altgens 6 and still have caught the head (face) shot.

Albert Doyle Wrote:They both could be heavily altered. However, in my opinion we have enough evidence for public action from Horne's Bethesda evidence alone.

Bob Prudhomme Wrote:Hi James

I agree with you, the matter of Chaney passing the limo, in order to alert Curry in the lead car, is an important puzzle that simply will not go away.

However, I have found that merely mentioning this matter on JFK forums is enough to draw instant ridicule, despite the indisputable fact that so many high ranking officials testified to the fact that Chaney arrived with the news at the lead car well before the limo arrived there. I believe the reason for this is that the possibilities this raises simply stagger the imagination of the average man. If Chaney actually did pass the limo, there are a great number of films and photos that had to be altered to conceal this fact.

That being said, there remains people, like you and I, who simply cannot dismiss a possibility because of its outrageousness. This means we also accept the limo stop and the large back of head wound despite evidence to the contrary, simply because too many witnesses reported these same things and were virtually unanimous in their descriptions.

As Sir Arthur Conan Doyle so aptly said, "When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth".

Albert Doyle Wrote:I think James is arguing from his own conspiracy world. One where somehow Dallek is a good JFK author. Meanwhile I don't see where I've committed the wrong James seems anxious to credit me with. Anyhow, the moderators don't want squabbles so I think people have seen enough.


Horne's Bethesda evidence shows reason for a public action in the Kennedy case. Drago and Salandria would probably say squabbling over alteration details is only prolonging the question.