+- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora)
+-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: JFK Assassination (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-3.html)
+--- Thread: A new Look at the BYP by Jeff Carter (/thread-14039.html)
A new Look at the BYP by Jeff Carter - David Josephs - 04-08-2015
Drew Phipps Wrote:Someone explain to me why Marina couldn't have been the person that slipped this photo as a "laughing at her husband behind his back" joke to the DeM's. I understand that a) she initially denied taking the photo, b) she denied writing the note on the back of the photo, and c) it is unlikely that she had access to a photo lab to make the non standard enlargement. However, none of that rules her out. She had access to the record sleeves in question, having borrowed them from Jean, and had a month or so window of time.
Because she nor Ozzie were in possession of those photos. EVER.
She did not take the photos nor ever even held that BOX camera... who for a first time user would not mention how difficult it was to hold at her chest and look at an upside down image and then take the photo.
That 133-A's negative did not survive the trip from garage to CSSS form to the WC is a bit suspect... no?
If you do a google search for the BYP you will find some of the OTHER images Peter discusses.
The black clothes that Ozzie is photographed wearing were never found in his possessions
The rifle was never shipped or picked up by anyone and it was never in Ozzie's possession... (Marina can testify till she's blue in the face - there is no reason to believe a single uncorroborated word she ways.)
The pistol has a myriad of problems which will be discussed in the next part of my Rifle work... (www.ctka.com has posted the first part along with my Money Order timeline)
Part of me feels that Robert may have been the body model... but I cannot prove that... just a hunch.
I have a question... the 133-B negative... is it an actual negative or a reversed image of the photo?
This is the link to the image and what was retouched http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh21/html/WH_Vol21_0240a.htm
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh21/html/WH_Vol21_0239a.htm
A new Look at the BYP by Jeff Carter - Drew Phipps - 04-08-2015
Quote: Because she nor Ozzie were in possession of those photos. EVER.
Notwithstanding the familiar points that you and Jim have raised, how do you PROVE that Marina wasn't involved? Also, Oswald's handwriting is allegedly on DeM's "first generation print" of 133A, so at least there is some evidence that he held that print in his hands at least once. Is there anything better from the handwriting experts on the "hunter of fascists" line, other than "can't tell who wrote it"?
If you can PROVE that the photo got to DeM's storage shed without passing thru Marina's hands, you:
1. will have identified a pre-assassination conspirator whose involvement must have begun no later than June 1963, OR,
2. will have identified someone that both knew Oswald's connection to DeM (before the WCR), and had at least clandestine access to the storage shed, before Oswald was killed, and after the discovery of the photos by DPD, in the belief that the Oswald-DeM connection (and the location of the storage unit) would be somehow otherwise made known to the police (who would then issue a search warrant and discover the photo with Oswald's handwriting on it), OR,
3. will have identified someone who knew about the Oswald-DeM connection (before the WCR), and yet who was someone stupid enough to take a risk to plant evidence using a very circuitous, unlikely, long-odds-of-success plan to incriminate LHO, after he was already dead and after he had been found guilty in the court of public opinion.