![]() |
The Selectice Service card photo - Printable Version +- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora) +-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: JFK Assassination (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-3.html) +--- Thread: The Selectice Service card photo (/thread-14015.html) |
The Selectice Service card photo - Drew Phipps - 14-07-2015 As we all know, the selective Service card with photo on it is a forgery. The Warren Commission even provides us a description of the manner of its forgery. What I'm curious about, is the origin of the photo, which isn't supposed to be there. Has anyone read a article, or have a link to an article, about the provenance of the photo? It doesn't appear to be one of the photos on "Evolution of Oswald." He looks younger, and he has less receding hair here, than in the other 1963 photos. However, "younger" sort of puts this photo in the Minsk days, or earlier... The Selectice Service card photo - David Josephs - 14-07-2015 It's from his DoD card The Selectice Service card photo - David Josephs - 15-07-2015 The Selectice Service card photo - Tom Scully - 15-07-2015 David Josephs Wrote: Not to drift too far, but David, what do you support "this" with, if it is your belief? Should it not need read, "Nagell claimed the police found....." (I'm always conscious of an audience consuming what I post and I try to be precise about what I actually have the ability to support. Dick Russell could not confirm what was found wiith Nagell at arrests, and Nagell's letter to Dir. Hoover is not confirmed. This is not to say I think you do not agree with having that on your mind....... Sorry to be such a stickler about all this "stuff".) It seems to leave an open question of whether Nagell used DPD evidence photo to fab his photo copy sent to his attorney at an unknown date. Front view from DPD evidence photo: http://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth49537/m1/1/sizes/ Back view of that ID evidence: http://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth49545/m1/1/sizes/?q=uniform Quote:http://www.ctka.net/2014-Josephs/Josephs_Mexico%20City_Part%201.html Related, old Jack White pres...... with an inaccuracies, IMO.... http://jfk.hood.edu/Collection/Weisberg%20Subject%20Index%20Files/W%20Disk/White%20Jack/Item%2008.pdf Come to think of it, since this evidence is the foundation of the card photo Drew asked about, I am not sure this is OT, so I will add it..... It is attributed to Doug Horne..... Quote:........BTW, I read you ask about Milton Paul Klein somewhere earlier today.: Quote:LIFE - Aug 27, 1965 - Page 64 - Google Books Result Jack White posted a link to Armstrong's research on the Klein company on an old thread on another forum, but I clicked it and it was dead. I recall reading Milton Klein's obit a few years ago, and there was the name of a younger man who had thought so highly of Klein he had changed his last name to Klein to honor Milton. Not sure it qualified as a legal adoption of a young adult....... The Selectice Service card photo - David Josephs - 15-07-2015 Thanks Tom... Thanks for the Milton Klein info... so he ran it, was Jacob President while Waldman/Kasper were VPs? As to what was found in Nagell's trunk... it was not what I posted which was Oswald's actual DoD card. Here is a composite of the passports and the photocopy of the Nagell version of Oswald's DoD card... As for Armstrong's work... the notebooks are here: http://digitalcollections.baylor.edu/cdm/tabs/collection/po-arm The Selectice Service card photo - David Healy - 15-07-2015 Drew Phipps Wrote:As we all know, the selective Service card with photo on it is a forgery. I have never, ever seen a selective service card include a photo of the holder. Has there been any background done concerning this "uniqueness?" The Selectice Service card photo - Tom Scully - 15-07-2015 David Josephs Wrote:Thanks Tom... I expect Milton's father Jacob was deceased no later than in the 1950's. Yeah, I know.....Nagell's photocopy was included at the image in the link I posted of Jack White's old presentation. My point is that what you are posting, as far as I am know, and what you wrote about it in the CTKA page that i linked to, is actually unsupported by anything that could actually be verified, going all the way back to when Nagell was visited in prison, by anything other than that no provenance photocopy, and Nagell's own claims. Physical evidence allegedly including a page of his inventoried possessions seized by his arresting officers, in his trial record, never turned up. He made a lot of claims, but it is what it is, and you embrace it at your own risk. I cannot allow myself to accept it, or i would reduce my requirements of proof below those of the WC. I am in this to keep it real. : Dick Russell 2003 Quote:https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/entry.php?270-Misunderstanding-of-the-Available-Evidence-Supporting-Nagell-s-Claims Post no one else's claims without verifying them and avoid making assumptions. It is actually less work and less time is wasted than by assuming other secondary sources have reliably documented and interpreted the evidence. The Selectice Service card photo - Drew Phipps - 15-07-2015 David Healy Wrote:I have never, ever seen a selective service card including a photo of the holder. Has there been any background done concerning this "uniqueness?" No, David, the photo is how we're real sure its a forgery. Since it is a forgery, I'm trying to get a handle on when it was made. The Selectice Service card photo - Drew Phipps - 15-07-2015 See here's my problem: The Warren Commission says that photo is Oswald in Minsk. If they're right, How does a Minsk photo of Oswald end up on a DOD ID issued before he went to Minsk? (BTW this is the photo at the top of the Google article on LHO. It also says Minsk.) If they're wrong, and it's a photo of Oswald made at the time of his discharge, why would Oswald use that old 1959 photo in late 1962 (if he's the forger, and he's using the equipment at JCS)? He would certainly know that a) taking a photo of an older photo of a subject is a less convincing forgery than just taking a new photo of the subject, and b) re-using the exact same photo as on his military ID is an excellent way to get caught, and c) the Selective Service cards don't have photos. If the SS card forger isn't Oswald, but someone else trying to frame him, if they have access to some or all of Oswald's records, and presumably have allies cunning and influential enough to slip this fake ID into Dallas PD or FBI evidence, why are they making so many elementary errors? All this is leading me to wonder if the DoD ID card is a deliberately clumsy forgery. That would explain the bogus "postmark," the incorrect height, the anomalous photo of Oswald (with a USSR white mark on the shoulder), and the incorrect eye color. Is this all an attempt to frame the KGB? The Selectice Service card photo - David Josephs - 15-07-2015 Tom... Quote:My point is that what you are posting, as far as I am know, and what you wrote about it in the CTKA page that i linked to, is actually unsupported by anything that could actually be verified, going all the way back to when Nagell was visited in prison, by anything other than that no provenance photocopy, and Nagell's own claims. Physical evidence allegedly including a page of his inventoried possessions seized by his arresting officers, in his trial record, never turned up. He made a lot of claims, but it is what it is, and you embrace it at your own risk. I cannot allow myself to accept it, or i would reduce my requirements of proof below those of the WC. I am in this to keep it real. Do we agree that the lawyer had the photocopy in his possession and that it was in his Nagell file? Do we agree that there were a number of items in Nagell's trunk and on his person at the time of his arrest? Do we agree that the card has the same number yet a different photo, different signature, and none of the ink marks that Oswald's has? Do we agree that we are not 100% sure where or how this card come to be in his file? Do we agree that this photocopy and Nagell are connected once he's been arrested? (Larry wrote: "what is documented is very suggestive...") I think that is the point Tom... until another corroborated explanation can be offered, the assumption is that this card was in Nagell's possession... and the question is "why?" --------------- I agree with you about the manner in which the information is shared. No, we are not 100% sure this card was in that trunk or on his person at the time and I should have made mention of that... so thanks for catching that. I will continue to "embrace at my own risk" - I can appreciate you not accepting it as 100% conclusive, yet until something else turns up there is nothing which disassociates the card from Nagell... right? http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh26/html/WH_Vol26_0191b.htm is the link to the "Minsk" claim about this image... and we are to remember that it expired Dec 1962. Finally, the bottom right of the photo where it appears to say JUL is not part of the stamp that appears to say OCT 23, 1963 but part of the photo - which is also not similar to the stamps of the time We also know that Oswald's DoD card with "the postmark that isn't" was part of a cache of items that simply materialized... there are some pretty significant items to NOT be listed... |