Robert Baer and the 9/11 Put Option Scandal - Printable Version +- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora) +-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: 911 (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-6.html) +--- Thread: Robert Baer and the 9/11 Put Option Scandal (/thread-14958.html) |
Robert Baer and the 9/11 Put Option Scandal - David Guyatt - 10-09-2016 From Sibel Edmonds Newsbud: Quote: I wonder if anyone here knows who the brokerage was in San Diego? Robert Baer and the 9/11 Put Option Scandal - R.K. Locke - 10-09-2016 I can't answer that question off the top of my head, but I will add that James Corbett is doing a whole series of these videos: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLN6xa7kD9dZ9gFFM6v6EloLGmQZFyeGqm Robert Baer and the 9/11 Put Option Scandal - David Guyatt - 10-09-2016 Thanks Tracy. I have a feeling it was Vanguard Capital. But I guess we'll never know for sure. Robert Baer and the 9/11 Put Option Scandal - Drew Phipps - 10-09-2016 The fact that Baer claimed, in 2008, to know the identity of someone who cashed out prior to 9/11 wouldn't make him an "accessory after the fact" in 2001. Nor would it necessarily subject him to obstruction of justice charges since the official investigation was complete in 2004. It would depend on when he received this information. However, you can well imagine that, if the new 9/11 litigation bill passed yesterday survives the threatened presidential veto, that the Saudis (who have an intelligence organization of their own, and enough money to hire a formidable defense team) will take an interest in deposing him. So, I would suggest that Corbett delay airing a "series of videos" until after the Senate and the House have the opportunity to override a veto. Robert Baer and the 9/11 Put Option Scandal - Lauren Johnson - 10-09-2016 Drew Phipps Wrote:The fact that Baer claimed, in 2008, to know the identity of someone who cashed out prior to 9/11 wouldn't make him an "accessory after the fact" in 2001. Nor would it necessarily subject him to obstruction of justice charges since the official investigation was complete in 2004. It would depend on when he received this information. However, you can well imagine that, if the new 9/11 litigation bill passed yesterday survives the threatened presidential veto, that the Saudis (who have an intelligence organization of their own, and enough money to hire a formidable defense team) will take an interest in deposing him. I'm not a fan of Corbett. This video is just one more example. Baer has been all over the map on 9/11. I think his job is to spread disinfo. Robert Baer and the 9/11 Put Option Scandal - R.K. Locke - 10-09-2016 Lauren Johnson Wrote:Drew Phipps Wrote:The fact that Baer claimed, in 2008, to know the identity of someone who cashed out prior to 9/11 wouldn't make him an "accessory after the fact" in 2001. Nor would it necessarily subject him to obstruction of justice charges since the official investigation was complete in 2004. It would depend on when he received this information. However, you can well imagine that, if the new 9/11 litigation bill passed yesterday survives the threatened presidential veto, that the Saudis (who have an intelligence organization of their own, and enough money to hire a formidable defense team) will take an interest in deposing him. I think his work is generally good but his list of "suspects" is a strange one so far. It also falls prey to many of the same fallacies that JFK research and analysis does - i.e. mistaking facilitators for sponsors, over-generalizing, failing to distinguish between foreknowledge and active participation, etc. His latest is about the "Dancing Israelis": Robert Baer and the 9/11 Put Option Scandal - Lauren Johnson - 10-09-2016 Quote:I think his work is generally good but his list of "suspects" is a strange one so far. I said I wasn't a fan of his, every once in a while he hits one of the park -- for example his 9/11 in a nutshell video. |