Deep Politics Forum
The Power of the Paedos - another high profile case hits the 'never happened' wall? - Printable Version

+- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora)
+-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: Human Trafficking (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-28.html)
+--- Thread: The Power of the Paedos - another high profile case hits the 'never happened' wall? (/thread-369.html)



The Power of the Paedos - another high profile case hits the 'never happened' wall? - Magda Hassan - 17-10-2012

Jan Klimkowski Wrote:
Quote:.....A spokesman for the firm said: "He has no recollection of visiting the home over 30 years ago and any such visit would have been unexceptional. Connecting Sir James to events at the home has caused him severe embarrassment and upset......
[ATTACH=CONFIG]4038[/ATTACH]


The Power of the Paedos - another high profile case hits the 'never happened' wall? - Jan Klimkowski - 21-10-2012

In the ever so reserved language of the of the British, Establishment, the BBC has been economical with the truth.

Here's an email sent in early October 2012 by Liz MacKean, the BBC investigative reporter whose exposure of Savile's child abuse was killed by Newsnight Editor Rippon in December 2011.


Quote:Sent: Mon 8/10/2012

From: Liz MacKean, Newsnight

To: George Entwistle, Director-General

Ever since the report was dropped [by the BBC], just ahead of it being edited, there have been repeated misleading statements from the press office about the nature of our investigation… Worst of all has been what seems like a concerted effort to make it appear that our story was about something else, something that could be dropped and forgotten ahead of fulsome tribute programmes. It is this which seems to be fuelling the damaging claims of a cover-up.


Auntie Beeb is in deep and deserved trouble, but still desperately trying to cover its tracks.

Here's some detailed background from The Independent:

Quote:Revealed: Newsnight emails that accuse BBC of Jimmy Savile cover-up

BBC boss was warned that broadcaster has issued 'misleading statements' about aborted Savile documentary


Ian Burrell Saturday 20 October 2012

The new Director-General of the BBC, George Entwistle, failed to adequately respond to an impassioned warning from a senior Newsnight journalist that the Corporation has been involved in a "concerted effort" to cover up the circumstances surrounding its decision not to screen an investigation into sexual abuse by Jimmy Savile.

A leading journalist on the original Savile exposé, Liz MacKean, has told Mr Entwistle he is mistaken in the account he has given to the BBC's staff and that the Corporation has issued "repeated misleading statements", The Independent has learnt.

Mr Entwistle declined the opportunity to speak to Ms MacKean even though he knew her, and replied with a two-line note, passing the matter to a colleague. The Director-General's handling of the matter is likely to weaken his position ahead of his appearance before Parliament on Tuesday, when he is expected to face difficult questions on his handling of the scandal that emerged during his first month in his post.

Ms MacKean and her colleague Meirion Jones, both experienced investigative journalists working on the original Savile story for the BBC, were yesterday summoned to a meeting by Peter Horrocks, the BBC's Director of Global News, who has stepped in to oversee the Corporation's ongoing coverage. It is believed to be the first time the two journalists who worked on the investigation have been given the chance to put their version of events to senior BBC management. In her email to Mr Entwistle 12 days ago, Ms MacKean said she wanted to "share with you my disquiet about the handling of the Newsnight Savile story". She denied Mr Entwistle's previous assertion that the story was "about the Surrey police investigation" and rejected an account by the Newsnight editor Peter Rippon, who posted a blog on the BBC website on 2 October, the day before ITV's Savile documentary, explaining his decision to drop the BBC's story.

"Ever since the report was dropped [by the BBC], just ahead of it being edited, there have been repeated misleading statements from the press office about the nature of our investigation," wrote Ms MacKean, who also complained about Newsnight's coverage of the scandal, once it had broken.

"To see what began as a BBC story running large on ITV is a hard thing. For it not to be mentioned in any way on Newsnight is another, quite absurd, thing. But worst of all has been what seems like a concerted effort to make it appear that our story was about something else, something that could be dropped and forgotten ahead of fulsome tribute programmes. It is this which seems to be fuelling the damaging claims of a cover-up."

The journalist's suggestion that the investigation was close to the edit stage and was sacrificed in December 2011 for How's About That Then?, a positive programme about Savile's life which fell under Mr Entwistle's responsibility as BBC Director of Vision raises questions about whether he did enough to satisfy himself that the former Jim'll Fix It presenter was worthy of such a tribute and whether Mr Rippon should have warned BBC senior management about the evidence his team had gathered.

Mr Entwistle has publicly said he was determined not to interfere in an independent editorial process and, although he was aware of a Newsnight investigation into Savile, "had no idea what the nature of the investigation was".

He replied to Ms MacKean who he knew from his time as editor of Newsnight with a two-line note: "Thank you for this. I have asked Ken MacQuarrie from BBC Scotland to get in touch with you to discuss this." But Mr MacQuarrie's role was quickly superseded by other official BBC inquiries announced this month. It is understood Mr Entwistle thought it inappropriate to speak directly to the journalists, who were asked to clarify their complaints.

Rob Wilson, the Conservative MP for Reading East, said: "George Entwistle's biggest weakness is that he failed in his duty on behalf of the licence fee payers he should have been in a position to stop the tribute programmes because he was asking the right questions internally about Jimmy Savile."

The Independent understands that a documentary by the BBC's own Panorama programme into the Savile scandal has obtained a series of internal BBC emails which throw new light on the background to the decision not to broadcast the Newsnight exposé.

Panorama interviewed both Ms MacKean and Mr Jones on Thursday and is understood to be in possession of an email from Mr Jones, in which the investigative reporter warned Mr Rippon in December 2011 of the likely consequences of his decision to abandon the story, accurately predicting the furore that has engulfed the BBC 10 months later. Another contemporaneous email from Ms MacKean, written to a friend, is said to express her frustration that Mr Rippon had pulled the programme after expressing a reluctance to fight the BBC's internal compliance culture. A further email contains Mr Rippon's response to the BBC press office's email about the programme in which he says that the investigation has been dropped and reportedly accuses the Corporation's communications team of putting "the cart before the horse".

This correspondence is understood to have been copied to the Deputy Director of BBC News, Stephen Mitchell, and raises further questions as to how much the BBC executive team knew of the strength of Newsnight's evidence on Savile, ahead of the tribute programme on 28 December. After news emerged that ITV was planning a documentary on allegations of sexual abuse by Savile, Ms MacKean is understood to have made a late attempt to salvage the Newsnight piece but was told "we are not going to jump on the ITV bandwagon".

Panorama is hoping to screen its documentary on Monday evening. Jones is now working with the flagship investigative team which is a fierce rival of Newsnight's although he is understood to have only a consultancy role. The Panorama programme is expected to be presented by Scottish-based presenter Shelley Jofre, who had no connection with the previous investigation.

Mr Horrocks' decision to hold talks yesterday with the two Newsnight journalists was regarded within the BBC news division as a signal of his intention to take a leading role in the crisis, which has raised doubts about Mr Entwistle's future as Director-General.

Mr Horrocks's role on the Savile story is the result of Director of News Helen Boaden having to stand back from coverage of the issue as she was head of the chain of command when the piece was dropped. The BBC says this was an editorial decision taken by Mr Rippon.

Earlier this week, the Culture Secretary Maria Miller called on the chair of the BBC Trust Lord Patten to seek assurances that the BBC's independent reviews into the Savile affair, one led by former High Court judge Dame Janet Smith, the other by former head of Sky News Nick Pollard, will have "unfettered access" to all sources of information.

Yesterday, Scotland Yard announced that Operation Yewtree, the inquiry into alleged child sexual exploitation by Savile and others, has become a formal criminal investigation. After two weeks of gathering information from both the public and a number of organisations, more than 400 lines of inquiry have been assessed and over 200 potential victims have been identified.

A spokesman for Scotland Yard said: "As we have said from the outset, our work was never going to take us into a police investigation into Jimmy Savile. What we have established in the past two weeks is that there are lines of inquiry involving living people that require formal investigation."

Peter Watt, head of the NSPCC's helpline, said: "It's now looking possible that Jimmy Savile was one the most prolific sex offenders the NSPCC has ever come across. We have received more than 136 calls directly relating to allegations against him which we've passed to the police."

A BBC spokesman said: "The BBC has confirmed it has launched an independent review led by former court of appeal judge Dame Janet Smith which will cover these questions. It would not be appropriate to comment further until these have been concluded."



The Power of the Paedos - another high profile case hits the 'never happened' wall? - Jan Klimkowski - 21-10-2012

An honest copper and an honest reporter:

Quote:Jimmy Savile: 'He was the tip of the iceberg'

The wide-ranging investigation into Sir Jimmy Savile's depraved activities has focused attention once more on claims of a possible paedophile ring and a 'culture of cover-up' on Jersey.


Daily Telegraph
By Eileen Fairweather
8:13PM BST 19 Oct 2012
In the bleak days of March 2008, the world's media gathered outside Haut de la Garenne, a forbidding and isolated former workhouse and children's home on Jersey. Police were digging for possible human remains and other evidence after almost 200 former residents of the home alleged abuse, including torture and rape, by staff and visitors over many years, with claims that some youngsters had "disappeared".

Officers from mainland British forces, who had previously taken over leadership of the local force on a mission to root out alleged "endemic corruption" within Jersey's constabulary, led the high‑profile investigation into historical child abuse on the island.

Now two of those officers, Jersey's former Chief Officer Graham Power and the former Deputy Chief Officer Lenny Harper, the senior officer in the Haut de la Garenne abuse inquiry, are backing victims' calls for an outside force to investigate allegations that Sir Jimmy Savile and others, including some celebrities, regularly sexually abused children on Jersey.

The shocking revelations of Savile's depraved behaviour have, to the relief of the Jersey abuse victims, refocused attention on Haut de la Garenne. In their view, it confirms their claims that the home was at the heart of a well-protected paedophile ring.

Allegations against Savile and other famous and powerful people were made during the 2008 inquiry. Earlier this week, the Telegraph revealed that another alleged abuser was the actor Wilfrid Brambell, the "dirty old man" of Steptoe and Son fame. One of two boys whom he abused in a back room at the Jersey Opera House in the Seventies was from Haut de la Garenne.

The States of Jersey Police have confirmed that an Haut de la Garenne resident had alleged abuse by Savile in the mid-Seventies during the 2008 inquiry, but said there had been insufficient evidence for an investigation to proceed. The authority has also confirmed that three more victims of Savile on Jersey have contacted them in recent days.

Carrie Modral, chair of the Jersey Care Leavers' Association, a charity run by people who have spent time in care, says: "It's good that the Savile scandal is making people think more about what happened here. But why have the States of Jersey only admitted it about Savile now? Because he's dead and he can't talk or bring down all the other big names. Their view would be that we, the survivors, keep going on about celebrities abusing kids at Haut de la Garenne, so OK, 'Here's one, he's dead and he can't talk.' But Savile was just the tip of the iceberg."

Lenny Harper agrees: "Savile chose his victims with great care; vulnerable and often troubled youngsters many in care homes. If they complained they were labelled troublemakers, or brutally put down. We know from court cases and statements made to my team [during the 2008 inquiry] that children in Jersey care homes were 'loaned out' to members of the yachting fraternity and other prominent citizens on the pretence of recreational trips but during which they were savagely abused and often raped.

"When these children complained they were beaten and locked in cellars [at Haut de la Garenne], which the Jersey authorities denied existed in 2008, but which can still be seen on YouTube footage. What chance did they have? This would have been the perfect hunting ground for Savile. The great and good of Jersey fawn over anyone with even loose connections to British royalty. Saville would have been a VIP to them and children would not have stood a dog's chance of complaining about him. It would have been so easy for him."

Rumours about abuse at Haut de la Garenne had been rife for years but, according to Harper, junior police officers who tried to help those making allegations were "thwarted by corrupt seniors". He claims that the 2008 inquiry so infuriated and embarrassed Jersey's establishment that a campaign was initiated to smear the lead officers and label them credulous and money-wasting.

The dig at the home was discredited, supposedly having found nothing, but even Harper's critical successors in the investigation admit that at least three human bone fragments were found and children's teeth, from between 10 and 65 children of all ages.

These have never been adequately explained, Harper says. "They were not from a long ago cemetery or all animal bones, but the bones proved impossible to date. One anthropologist said they were a couple of decades old, but another said they could not be dated. We'll never know. They were definitely human and juvenile."

Harper retired in autumn 2008, to spend more time with his daughter and her young family, after his Army officer son-in-law was killed in Iraq. His supportive boss, Chief Officer Graham Power, a former senior Met officer and recipient of the Queen's Police Medal, was suspended in November 2008. Both officers were later investigated by outside forces, at Jersey's instigation, but no evidence of misconduct was found.

Jersey's former health minister, Stuart Syvret, who backed the victims and police in the 2008 investigation, was also sacked. He was imprisoned last year for publicising a serious allegation on another, unrelated matter which, for legal reasons, cannot be described.

Syvret told the Telegraph: "Jimmy Savile abused children in Jersey. I believed his victims. Just as I believe the two people who told me of child abuse by another TV personality [this week confirmed as Brambell] on Jersey from the Seventies. Just as I believed those who told me that the authorities of the day had ignored their complaints of years of abuse by others in Jersey's children's homes. Savile is dead, so why must we dig into the sorry and wretched details? Because the crucial feature of this case is not so much the individual crimes, as bad as they are, and as damaging for the victims; it is, instead, what I call the 'culture of cover‑up'."

As a result of the fallout from the investigation into Haut de la Garenne, the public was left believing that Harper and his team had over-reacted to the abuse allegations. Yet seven people have since been convicted of abuse as a result of the inquiry, and to date compensation has been agreed for over 100 victims, with many more civil cases pending. Police had allegations against 150 individuals, many never adequately investigated including Savile. There are at least four known victims of Savile from Jersey, and at least one disclosed their abuse to police in 2008, yet it is only now that their claims are being considered seriously.

Jersey Police have confirmed that one victim made accusations against Savile in 2008. But, for reasons that are still unclear, it is thought the allegations were not typed up into the statements seen by senior officers. It is believed that Savile denied ever having been to Haut de la Garenne and threatened to sue a newspaper for claiming that he visited the home.

Although the Metropolitan Police are co-ordinating inquiries across Britain into Savile's alleged crimes, it is individual forces that are expected to examine them in detail. Carrie Modral says few of the victims trust Jersey's police to do so. "That window of opportunity closed when the Jersey establishment got rid of the good cops," she says.

It was a member of the Jersey Care Leavers' Association who told police in 2008 that she was sexually abused at Haut de la Garenne by Savile. "The news about Savile has brought it all back, she is in great distress," says Modral. "Savile visited regularly, not just Haut de la Garenne but other children's homes on the island. He wasn't the only visitor. The victim has named another household name who visited the home with Savile."

She added: "I can tell you that two staff members who abused her at another home have been imprisoned, and the authorities have agreed financial compensation for her. But another man in a position of authority who regularly visited Haut de la Garenne and abused her there is still free and now employed in a responsible position by the state."

Lenny Harper has confirmed to the Telegraph that he arrested this man for allegedly raping two other children at the home: "I gave a lot of information to the authorities about him, but he's still employed by them in a senior position," Harper says. "There were two solid allegations of rape against him that would have been proceeded with if it was in the UK. There was similar fact evidence. But Jersey's Attorney General ruled that it was not.

"When we started the dig this man turned up and demanded access to the site. He allegedly wanted to get some stuff he'd left there years before. Yet this man's name aroused more fear in the victims than any other in the inquiry."

Ms Modral agreed: "He was no holds barred. And I have been told he made it clear he had friends and felt he would be protected. If he goes down he will bring down the government [in Jersey], because of what he knows about other people. The press needs now to look at all the other big name visitors to the home."

What Savile did to the victim was "horrible, but small beer" compared to what others did to her, says Modral. "Savile put her on his knee and got his hand up her skirt. Then he tried to touch her little sister, and she pulled her away when he started to cuddle her. She was already being abused at Haut de la Garenne by staff, so she knew what he would do. Imagine being so young yourself and trying to save your little sister. They were 11 and nine."

Modral says she met Savile when he visited a youth club on the island. "It's ridiculous that he said he was never here. He was always coming to the island to open charity walks, and [visit] the children's home and children would go [to see him]. I didn't like the man, I stayed well away, I found him frightening, just the look of him."

Possible links are emerging between abuse in Jersey children's homes and the earlier notorious Islington children's homes paedophile ring. A key figure in the ring, Islington's deputy children's homes superintendent Nicholas Rabet, came from Jersey. He had worked there in childcare, and regularly took children from the north London council's homes on camping trips to the island.

Rabet fled Britain after the press exposed him, but was charged in Thailand in 2006 with abusing 30 boys there, the youngest six. He killed himself before he could be tried. His ally, Neil Hocquart, killed himself in custody in Ely, Cambridgeshire, in 1991, after being found with hundreds of paedophile videos. He had grown up in care in Norfolk and was taken to Guernsey, where he became the "cabin boy" of a sea captain, before returning to Britain to recruit children for the paedophile ring. Karin Ward, who featured in the ITV documentary about Savile that sparked the current inquiries, has described being abused by the star during a camping trip to Jersey from her Norfolk children's home.

The former Jersey Chief Officer Graham Power says the fact that more than 100 victims on Jersey have now received out-of-court settlements and a significant number of civil cases are still pending illustrates the scale of the abuse. He says he understands why victims mistrust the local force to investigate the Savile allegations: "The scale of abuse that occurred in this small community was so great that it seems to be beyond doubt that persons in authority must have known something of what was taking place, and, from what we know so far, they appear to have done nothing to protect the children who were being abused in establishments operated by their own government. This is a matter which merits honest and independent examination."

Alan Collins, a solicitor with Pannone, a legal firm specialising in abuse cases that is representing 58 of the victims, says initially all the focus was on Haut de la Garenne, its workers and management. "Jimmy Savile was a sideshow. I honestly couldn't say how many have named Savile. But there were several people who named him, it was plural, not singular. All the allegations need to be looked at now en masse for similar fact evidence, because now we are seeing a bigger jigsaw. Each individual complaint makes more sense now. Savile is dead but others who abused them are not."

The Attorney General, William Bailhache, issued a statement in June 2009 stating that two historic abuse investigations were dropped because of a lack of evidence. "Cases of this nature are often difficult. There is rarely any independent evidence, and often the cases come down to being the word of one person against another… A decision not to bring criminal proceedings does not necessarily mean that those who have made complaints are not believed. A decision not to prosecute means only that the Attorney General, having fully considered all of the available evidence and other information, has decided that an acquittal is more likely than a conviction."

The Image is of the Beast of Jersey, as described by his child victims.


The Power of the Paedos - another high profile case hits the 'never happened' wall? - Magda Hassan - 24-10-2012

From the observant David Guyatt. :humble: Definitely worth following this in parliament and outside.

Quote:
Quote:MP Tom Watson asks Prime Minister in today's Prime Minister's Questions about a powerful paedophile network in Downing Street and Parliament:

http://labourlist.org/2012/10/tom-watsons-pmqs-question-on-powerful-paedophile-network-linked-to-parliament-and-number-10/


QUOTE


Tom Watson just told the Commons at PMQS:
"The evidence file used to convict paedophile Peter Righton if it still exists, contains clear intelligence of a widespread paedophile ring. One of it's members boasts of his links to a senior aide of a former Prime minister, who says he could smuggle indecent images of children from abroad. The leads were not followed up, but if the files still exist, I want to ensure that the Metropolitan Police secure the evidence, re-examine it, and investigate clear intelligence suggesting a powerful paedophile network linked to Parliament and Number 10″.
Early indications are that this refers to the Heath/Thatcher governments.
UNQUOTE


The "early indications" might be wrong. I have a suspicion this may be about Peter Mandelsohn. But we'll see.

Anyway, a really important question placed in the public arena. Cameron took it seriously. He was shaken. He also appeared to know something about it judged by his body language and careful answer.



The Power of the Paedos - another high profile case hits the 'never happened' wall? - Malcolm Pryce - 24-10-2012

Did anyone spot an interesting revelation in the Panorama programme that seems to have been overlooked? They interviewed a guy whose aunt had been headmistress of Duncroft School in the 70s, scene of some of Jimmy Savile's depredations. He described it in these words:


"it was a very strange place, full of celebrities and minor members of the Royal family."


Minor members of the Royal Family? At an approved school for 'problem' girls? What's that all about then?


The Power of the Paedos - another high profile case hits the 'never happened' wall? - Magda Hassan - 24-10-2012

A little more background on today's PMQ's

October 24th, 2012 |[url=http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/category][/url]
I cannot give much more detail until the police have been given more time to investigate whether evidence still exists from the mid-nineties, but here is what I can say.
Last week I was contacted by a former child protection specialist who for some years, had been concerned that a wider investigation regarding the activities of convicted paedophile, Peter Righton was not fully investigated.
He contacted me because he knew I had spoken out in the Murdoch scandal. Over the years, he had lost faith in the ability of politicians to get to the truth. The last time he contacted an MP was in 1994. The MP promised to follow up the case but nothing came of it.
The central allegation was that a large body of material seized in the raid on Righton's home had not been fully investigated. Though Righton was the subject of a BBC profile in 1994 [I think this is the date] "The Secret Life of a Paedophile", little had been done to follow up the leads from the case. A specialist unit in Scotland Yard had the material which supplemented a wider investigation into organised paedophile rings in children's homes.
Over the last few days I have spoken to two other child protection specialists who share the concern of the gentleman who contacted me.
Within the material seized at Righton's home were letters from known and convicted paedophiles. The contact, who has seen the letters, claimed that one paedophile in particular was of great concern. He said that the paedophile, who worked with children, boasted of a key aide to a former PM who could help get hold of indecent images of children. I am not naming the person for obvious reasons but for clarity it is not former MP, Peter Morrison. This afternoon my office has been bombarded with calls regarding Morrison, I think because he was named by Edwina Currie at the weekend as having inappropriate sexual relations with teenage boys.
I'll say more when I can but this may not be for some time.
I should say that like with the hacking scandal, a number of people have contacted me this afternoon offering more information regarding the case. I am happy to talk to anyone who can help me particularly those who came into contact with Righton and his contacts when they were young. I can understand how powerless they must have felt at the time Righton's net was cast wide.
One person also contacted me to suggest that the Met held a vast quantity of material suggesting Jimmy Savile was a predatory paedophile. I do not know whether this is true but I do know the source and she has been 100% accurate in the past.
One final thing I should say I made the decision to ask a question of the PM late this morning and had not had time to write to the Met before speaking out. I have no doubt the Met will take this seriously and am sorry I didn't have time to forewarn the commissioner of my intention to raise the matter.
I have written to him this afternoon with more details regarding the case. This will obviously remain confidential.
http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/



The Power of the Paedos - another high profile case hits the 'never happened' wall? - Jan Klimkowski - 24-10-2012

Tom Watson MP.

Takes on the Murdoch crime family.

Takes on intelligence-run paedophile networks.

He's a brave man.


The Power of the Paedos - another high profile case hits the 'never happened' wall? - Jan Klimkowski - 24-10-2012

Malcolm Pryce Wrote:Did anyone spot an interesting revelation in the Panorama programme that seems to have been overlooked? They interviewed a guy whose aunt had been headmistress of Duncroft School in the 70s, scene of some of Jimmy Savile's depredations. He described it in these words:


"it was a very strange place, full of celebrities and minor members of the Royal family."


Minor members of the Royal Family? At an approved school for 'problem' girls? What's that all about then?

Malcolm - listen to the Duncroftees speak. Many are "posh".

In my view, it is appropriate to consider all approved schools and orpanages, in post-WW2 UK, USA and Australia as potential sites of intelligence-funded Behaviourist experimentation to "improve" the human condition. Of course not all approved schools and orphanages provided fodder for such "research".

The House of Saxe-Coburg is Eugenicist (Eugenie - cist?) to its core. I'm sure the Windsors would have been very happy to have "poor character traits" such as "wilfulness" or "hysteria" conditioned out of their genetic pool. We know the "genetically inferior" results of Saxe-Coburg inbreeding were locked away in secret estates, or possibly even allowed to perish.

Anyway, the Daily Mail finally published the Savile story I've refrained from bringing to DPF.

But yes, it appears Jimmy liked trying to fix it for stiffs.


Quote:Savile sex scandal hits horrific new low as former colleague Paul Gambaccini claims on Radio Five Live that DJ was a 'necrophiliac'

Former BBC DJ said he was aware of claims in the eighties

'The expression I came to associate with Savile's sexual partners was "under-age subnormals", says colleague of the Jim'll Fix It presenter

In 1990 interview Savile dismissed claims he was a necrophiliac after saying he took pleasure in taking dead people to a hospital mortuary


By Larisa Brown

PUBLISHED: 16:25, 23 October 2012 | UPDATED: 10:20, 24 October 2012

Comments (619)
Share


A former BBC colleague of Jimmy Savile has claimed the predatory paedophile was a necrophiliac.

It is one of the most extraordinary allegations to have come out in the wake of the scandal.

The claim was made on Radio 5 Live today by Paul Gambaccini, who started working as a DJ on Radio 1 in 1973.

Mr Gambaccini, 63, said he was aware of the necrophilia claims in the eighties.

He questioned why newspapers had not acted when he said a reporter had boasted that his colleagues were aware of a story linking Savile to 'necrophilia'.

His comments astounded presenter Nicky Campbell who tried to stop the conversation by warning the allegations were not in the public domain.

Campbell said: 'That particularly lurid accusation that you have just brought to people's attention is one that has not been in the public domain.'

More...

'The girls were teenagers, they were not too young': Explosive email reveals editor's reasons for axing Savile Newsnight expose
'Get a grip'! MPs tell BBC boss to sort out Savile scandal as he admits Beeb is now investigating up to 10 'serious allegations' against past and present employees
NINE suspects in the frame at BBC: But we aren't allowed to know if they've been suspended

Gambaccini agreed and asked 'why not?'. And he asked: 'Who vetted the knighthood? Coco the clown?

He had worked with Savile at Radio 1 where he had first heard stories about his abuse of under-age girls.

He said the BBC was not the only organisation at fault for failing to expose Savile, saying the press was equally to blame.

He claimed a reporter was heard talking at a wedding 10 years ago about Savile being a necrophiliac.

He said that he used a 'politically incorrect' term to categorise the people to whom Savile devoted his attentions.

He said: 'The expression I came to associate with Savile's sexual partners was either one used by production assistants or one I made up to summarise their reports ... "under-age subnormals".

'He targeted the institutionalised, the hospitalised - and this was known. Why did Jimmy go to hospitals? That's where the patients were.' Paul Gambaccini said the BBC was not the only organisation at fault for failing to expose Savile, saying the press was equally to blame.

Paul Gambaccini said the BBC was not the only organisation at fault for failing to expose Savile, saying the press was equally to blame.

Mr Gambaccini continued to say today that Savile's alleged abuse was taking place at a time when staff failed to get to grips with the concept of paedophilia.

'It was considered so far beyond the pale that people didn't believe it happened,' he said during the 5 Live Breakfast Show.

He said the entire society was taken in by Savile - 'including the Prime Minister who invited him to Chequers; including the royal family, photographed with him, he got a knighthood in this country, he got a papal knighthood.

'This is not just the BBC this is history, this is a man who conned an entire society,' Gambaccini added.

It also emerged earlier this month that Savile denied claims he was sexually attracted to corpses in an interview in 1990, after he admitted taking pleasure in taking the deceased to Stoke Mandeville Hospital mortuary.

The hospital, where Savile worked as a volunteer and had his own room, said that it has never received claims that Savile 'inappropriately interacted' with corpses.

A spokesman said: 'We are not launching an investigation into claims that Savile was a necrophiliac. We have never received any complaints as to that nature.'

'During our time, to the best of our knowledge, Jimmy was not given free access around our clinical areas and whenever he attended the hospital he would give advance notice and usually be in attendance with his fundraising team.'
Admittance: Max Clifford and Petrie Hosken appearing on This Morning. Mr Clifford admitted he was aware of the abuse allegations about Savile because of his work on a story about convicted paedophile Gary Glitter

Admittance: Max Clifford and Petrie Hosken appearing on This Morning. Mr Clifford admitted he was aware of the abuse allegations about Savile because of his work on a story about convicted paedophile Gary Glitter

In the 1990 interview with Q magazine, The Sun reported Savile was given the job of taking the dead to the mortuary.

Savile, who died last year at 84, said: 'One of my jobs is to take away the deceased. You can look after somebody, be alone with somebody, who has lived a whole lifetime, and I'm just saying goodbye and looking after him.

'That is a privilege and an honour. Some people get hold of the fact that Jim likes looking after cadavers and say, "Aha, Jim's a necrophiliac!' I'm not a necrophiliac".'

In an interview on ITV's This Morning today Max Clifford admitted he was aware of the abuse allegations because of his work on a story about convicted paedophile Gary Glitter.

'Don't forget I was the one that broke the Gary Glitter story, and when the people that came to me to tell me about Gary Glitter, Jimmy Savile's name came up several times in those conversations. That was years ago... I passed it all on.'

Asked by Phillip Schofield if he passed the allegations on to the police, Clifford replied: 'No, the people concerned. The people that came to see me.

'And two or three of the people that came to see me didn't then fulfil their story with Gary Glitter for their own reasons... it's up to the people concerned to go to the police. It's not for me to say. They're the ones that this happened to or experienced it or saw it.'

He justified his actions saying you can not 'make someone go the police.'

'It's their lives, it's their future. The information doesn't stack up unless they are prepared to go to the police and explain it.'

He also alluded to the fact other figures could be implicated in the scandal, with Clifford saying: 'Oh, there's lots of other people.'



The Power of the Paedos - another high profile case hits the 'never happened' wall? - Danny Jarman - 25-10-2012

Quote:Milligan was a well respected MP and part time journalist. Milligan
allegedly approached the footballer who was not prepared to drop his
attempts to sell the story. Milligan allegedly reported back to the
security services who informed Milligan that unless the footballer did
keep matters quiet he would be eliminated. Apparently there was more
to the story than simply the gay sex aspect, the introduction of the
footballer to the cabinet ministers was allegedly arranged by a third
party who had very close links with an extremely powerful paedophile
ring
. The implication was that the cabinet ministers may also have
been involved with the paedophile ring although this was not confirmed
in the Scallywag report, however it was very clearly hinted at.

(source: https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/showthread.php?4437-Police-find-body-in-bag-at-MI6-man-s-London-flat&p=25236#post25236)

Then you see this.

Maybe Fashanu knew.


The Power of the Paedos - another high profile case hits the 'never happened' wall? - Magda Hassan - 25-10-2012

Danny Jarman Wrote:
Quote:Milligan was a well respected MP and part time journalist. Milligan
allegedly approached the footballer who was not prepared to drop his
attempts to sell the story. Milligan allegedly reported back to the
security services who informed Milligan that unless the footballer did
keep matters quiet he would be eliminated. Apparently there was more
to the story than simply the gay sex aspect, the introduction of the
footballer to the cabinet ministers was allegedly arranged by a third
party who had very close links with an extremely powerful paedophile
ring
. The implication was that the cabinet ministers may also have
been involved with the paedophile ring although this was not confirmed
in the Scallywag report, however it was very clearly hinted at.

(source: https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/showthread.php?4437-Police-find-body-in-bag-at-MI6-man-s-London-flat&p=25236#post25236)

Then you see this.

Maybe Fashanu knew.
Well spotted Danny!