Proof the fatal shot came from somewhere else other then the rear

[Scott Kaiser]

Evidence the fatal shot came from somewhere else other than the rear:


1. At zfilm 313 under 10x magnification the first signs of disturbance shows a the front lateral cranium, and not at the rear.


2. At zfilm 313 under 10x magnification there shows no signs of disturbance at the rear of the head.


3. Motion at impact shows Kennedy being violently thrust back and to the left.


4. Motion at impact shows Kennedy's [right arm] instantly "lift in an upwards motion" indicating the projectile hit Kennedy somewhere from the front in order for the reaction upon impact to sustain a follow thru motion.


5. At zfilm 317 under 10x magnification shows Kennedy's hair saturated in liquid matter and blood which has held a lock of hair above his scalp indicating a frontal shot not a rear shot.

[Brian Castle]

Hi Scott - two dozen witnesses would probably agree with you, but are you seriously basing your conclusion on the altered Zapruder film?

The problem with issues like these is there is contrary evidence. Any credible crime scene model has to address the contrary evidence.

The most damning part of the contrary evidence (relative to your claim) is the alleged fracture lines in Kennedy's skull, which would seem to indicate a rear entry. Are you going to say the autopsy was staged or somehow corrupted? Or, how would you explain the medical evidence that indicates the fatal shot came from behind?

The best evidence for a frontal shot is the 85-or-so people who ran up the grassy knoll, 'cause they saw puffs of smoke or heard rifle fire or whatever.

But the Z-film has been demonstrably altered, that can be easily shown both within individual frames and from one frame to the next. Zapruder himself says he filmed the turn sequence which is missing from the public version. Are you familiar with the chain of custody of the film and its copies?

[Scott Kaiser]

but are you seriously basing your conclusion on the altered Zapruder film?

I get that question a lot, and yet, everyone still looks at every zfilm that's been published. I've only worked off one film, and one film only. The link is provided below, so, does this make my observations inconclusive?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kq1PbgeBoQ4

[Scott Kaiser]

The Zapruder film is the preeminent, indisputable, reliable, conclusive evidence, which can not be refuted, it's not the x-rays or still shot photos which show no motion, or range of motion upon impact, nothing else out there matters. Without the Zapruder film, there would be none of the observations noted above. No one, not even Posner would challenge these findings. Proof the "[fatal]" shot came from somewhere else other than the rear.

[Drew Phipps]

Where did you get your un-digitized copy of Zapruder?

[David Healy]

Evidence the fatal shot came from somewhere else other than the rear:


1. At zfilm 313 under 10x magnification the first signs of disturbance shows a the front lateral cranium, and not at the rear.


2. At zfilm 313 under 10x magnification there shows no signs of disturbance at the rear of the head.


3. Motion at impact shows Kennedy being violently thrust back and to the left.


4. Motion at impact shows Kennedy's [right arm] instantly "lift in an upwards motion" indicating the projectile hit Kennedy somewhere from the front in order for the reaction upon impact to sustain a follow thru motion.


5. At zfilm 317 under 10x magnification shows Kennedy's hair saturated in liquid matter and blood which has held a lock of hair above his scalp indicating a frontal shot not a rear shot.

out of curiosity, has Harris ever stated why this version of the Z-film is not in full color?

There also appear to be video artifacts in the clip, is that correct?

I'd be very interested in seeing this clip in realtime/real speed, post z-313 back and to the left appears more violent than what we see in the old MPI version...

[Drew Phipps]

Hah hah, that's funny, you're telling me you looked at a poorly digitized film clip under a microscope to get your "proof"?

[David Josephs]

The Zapruder film is the preeminent, indisputable, reliable, conclusive evidence, which can not be refuted, it's not the x-rays or still shot photos which show no motion, or range of motion upon impact, nothing else out there matters. Without the Zapruder film, there would be none of the observations noted above. No one, not even Posner would challenge these findings. Proof the "[fatal]" shot came from somewhere else other than the rear.

That is simply not true Scott...

The extant film is in no less than 7 pieces.
It does NOT have 0183 stamped anywhere on it.
It has over 40 feet of film spliced together when 1 side of film is 30 feet max
0184 is never accounted for yet is referred to in Max Phillips' note to Chief Rowley when he sends what he claims is a 3rd copy, yet he does not give Zapruder more than the original when we know he had a "best copy" that is given to Stolley on Saturday.

There was then in fact a version of the film in DC by 2am Friday night / Sat morn. Dino says he got an 8mm film Saturday night. the Philips film was 8mm and in my opinion was 0184.

As for it being "conclusive evidence" you'd have to explain the many, many anomolies that we see in the film which cannot be explained with natural physics. That "first Life Break" of the film at 157/158 is simply that, a break..
There should not be anything strange about those two frames... but like Greer's rapid head spins at 302/303 and 316/317 we see an very unnatural head spin by JFK...

Sorry for the quality - that's the best I could do right now....

Without the Zfilm we MAY have had to listen to the witnesses' accounts - the Zfilm is the single greatest piece of disinformation in this case.

[Drew Phipps]

What is the white arrow pointing to in your insert there?

[David Josephs]

What is the white arrow pointing to in your insert there?

To show the direction of JFK's face and how in 1/18th of a second he turns from facing SW to NW

(edit - had it backward - thanks Drew!)