Obama and chemtrails

[Jack White]

Obama’s Plan To “Geo-Engineer” The Planet Mirrors CFR Policy Documents


Radical terraforming programs come from elite Internationalists

Steve Watson
Infowars.net
Thursday, April 9, 2009

The Obama administration’s announcement that it is to consider radical planetary “geo-engineering”, such as “shooting pollution particles into the upper atmosphere to reflect the sun’s rays”, exactly mirrors recent publications penned by the elite Council On Foreign Relations.

Yesterday the Associated Press reported that the Obama administration has held discussions regarding the possibility of “geo-engineering” the earth’s climate to counter global warming.

The AP report states that Obama’s science advisor John Holdren is pushing for radical terra forming programs to be explored such as creating an “artificial volcano”. Despite Holdren’s admission that such measures could have “grave side effects,” he added that, “we might get desperate enough to want to use it.”

Such ideas exactly mirror those put forth by the CFR in previous years.
In briefing notes (PDF) published in May 2008 from the CFR’s Geoengineering: Workshop on Unilateral Planetary Scale Geoengineering, the elite internationalist group lays out the exact same radical ideas now being touted by the Obama administration.

The following excerpts are taken from the document:

Geoengineering Strategies

Among all geoengineering schemes, those currently considered most feasible involve increasing the planetary albedo, that is, reflecting more sunlight back into space before it can be absorbed. There are a number of different methods that could be used to increase the planet’s reflectivity:

1. Add more small reflecting particles in the upper part of the atmosphere (the stratosphere which is located between 15 and 50 kilometers above the Earth’s surface).

2. Add more clouds in the lower part of the atmosphere (the troposphere)

3. Place various kinds of reflecting objects in space either near the earth or at a stable location between the earth and the sun.

4. Change large portions of the planet’s land cover from things that are dark (absorbing) such as trees to things that are light (reflecting) such as open snowcover or grasses.

Stratospheric Aerosols that might be engineered to migrate to particular regions (e.g. over the arctic) or to rise above the stratospher (so as not to interfere in stratospheric chemistry).

Adding more of the right kind of fine particles to the stratosphere can increase the amount of sunlight that is reflected back into space.

Applied to geoengineering, various technologies could be used to loft particles into the stratosphere, such as naval guns, rockets, hot air balloons or blimps, or a fleet of highflying aircraft. Potential types of particles for injection include sulfur dioxide, aluminum oxide dust or even designer self-levitating aerosols.

The CFR’s geo-engineering research program is directed by David G. Victor a Professor at Stanford Law School and an Adjunct Senior Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. Also involved are M. Granger Morgan, head of Carnegie Mellon University’s Department of Engineering, Jay Apt, Professor of Engineering and Public Policy at Carnegie Mellon University, and John Steinbruner, Professor of Public Policy and Director of the Center for International and Security Studies at the University of Maryland.

In an article entitled The Geoengineering Option: A Last Resort Against Global Warming? published in this month’s Foreign Affairs, the CFR’s monthly magazine, the directors once again lay out their ideas for planetary terraforming, calling for a worldwide 60-80 percent cut in carbon emissions.

Obama’s push toward a so called “cap and trade” carbon taxation program is also a direct descendant of Victor et al’s CFR policy formation.

A CFR geo-engineering meeting summary document from 1999 (PDF pages 12,13,14) also categorically states that the ultimate goal under “A technology strategy for global warming” is the implementation of a global Carbon Tax.
The memo also pedantically explains how the perceived fear of global warming can be used to sell to Americans what is essentially a tax on air:

“While taxing tea pales in comparison to taxing air as a perceived government affront, the clear benefits of a taxation policy to combat global warming might convince even the descendents of our tax-resistant Founding Fathers.”

The tentative announcement by the Obama administration of the existence of geoengineering research programs is a first step toward introducing the idea to the wider public.

However, as we highlighted in our master article yesterday, geo-engineering is undoubtedly already being conducted by government-affiliated universities, government agencies, and on a mass scale through chemtrail spraying.

Such programs merely scratch the surface of what is likely to be a gargantuan and overarching black-budget funded project to terraform the planet, with little or no care for the unknown environmental consequences this could engender.

Further Research: Here is an extremely valuable file folder containing 8 PDFs, all published by the CFR, and all concerning their Geo-Engineering Program.

Research related articles:
1. Council on Foreign Relations on Planetary Geoengineering: “Add more small reflecting particles in the upper part of the atmosphere”
2. Obama To Consider Geoengineering Climate
3. Barack Obama criticised for failure to signal change in foreign policy
4. Geoengineering may be tech’s answer to global warming
5. Brzezinski: Obama Will Face “Imminent” Foreign Policy Problems
6. WHO GETS WHAT: Obama plan has billions for cops
7. ABC Reporters Team Up with Environmental Activists on Planet Green
8. Ron Paul: Obama Foreign Policy Identical To Bush
9. The Government Is Already “Geo-Engineering” The Environment
10. Obama climate plan costs $2 trillion
11. ‘Sunshade’ global-cooling plan would ruin solar power
12. The Obama Deception - Now Streaming For Prison Planet.tv Members!

[David Guyatt]

Most interesting Jack.

One of the less well known plans of Nazi Germany was to place a giant mirror in space as a satellite and to use that mirror as a huge weapon that would harness and direct the Sun's energy so that it could cut a swathe of death - of their choosing - across selected regions of the world.

[Jack White]

Covering a Wisconsin sky.

[Ed Jewett]

I am not sure where to place this as there are multiple threads on the topic in science, environment and black ops, but I see this one along with recognizable and smiling faces, so here goes...:

1) I am relatively new to the topic, previously dimly aware, skeptic but with a raised eyebrow; I had seen other "treatments" of the topic, including one purportedly with photos of aircraft especially configured, but remained skeptic.

2) Catherine Austin Fitts through Solari has recently brushed across the topic and provides a 100-minute video and a web site, which I am not exploring, and I offer them up for common consumption and digestion.

Documentary: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=...655156407#

Web site: http://www.carnicom.com/

[Charles Drago]

Chemtrail debunkers are quick to note that the long, lingering, widely spreading "contrails" occur under various combinations of altitude, temperature, relative humidity, other meteorological conditions, and fuel mixtures.

The shorter, "conventional" contrails too are dependent on similar factors.

It would stand to reason, then, that over the course of any 12-month span and absent contributing factors not present during the previous 12 months in which contrails of diverse appearance were observed and noted, we should see consistently diverse patterns in the skies.

Here's the problem: For the past year, daytime observations of classic "chemtrails" from my consistent observation point have all but ceased. In the previous year, the "chemtrails" were present on an almost daily basis.

To my knowledge, flight paths have not been altered (I'm under flights from Boston, Hartford, and Providence airports). I have no way of knowing if changes have been made in altitude and fuel composition.

There has been zero meaningful fluctuation in weather patterns over both years.

So if "chemtrails" are in fact "contrails" ... Where the hell are they now?

[Jack White]

Chemtrail debunkers are quick to note that the long, lingering, widely spreading "contrails" occur under various combinations of altitude, temperature, relative humidity, other meteorological conditions, and fuel mixtures.

The shorter, "conventional" contrails too are dependent on similar factors.

It would stand to reason, then, that over the course of any 12-month span and absent contributing factors not present during the previous 12 months in which contrails of diverse appearance were observed and noted, we should see consistently diverse patterns in the skies.

Here's the problem: For the past year, daytime observations of classic "chemtrails" from my consistent observation point have all but ceased. In the previous year, the "chemtrails" were present on an almost daily basis.

To my knowledge, flight paths have not been altered (I'm under flights from Boston, Hartford, and Providence airports). I have no way of knowing if changes have been made in altitude and fuel composition.

There has been zero meaningful fluctuation in weather patterns over both years.

So if "chemtrails" are in fact "contrails" ... Where the hell are they now?

Exactly!!!!!!!!!

Jack

[Ed Jewett]

When Wall Street figures out how to make a quick buck off this phenomenon, we'll have another clue. I have seen but would not vouch for "inside" photographs and the like. Interesting issue to watch and ponder...

[Ed Jewett]

[B] BlueNoMore.com - A Definitive Study About Chemtrails & Contrails By A Commercial Pilot Trained And Experienced In Cloud Science [/B]


“The sky is no less blue because the blind man does not see it” (Danish proverb).
“Is the sky now less blue because those with eyes act as blind men?” (Anon).
The sight of big jet tankers flying side-by-side, emptying tons of man-made, toxic, chemical aerosols into the sky above our heads, day and night, does little to inspire a feeling of security. And when we are told that we are not seeing what we know we are, by those whom we imagine we have elected to protect us from such things, our hearts begin to sink. This book is for those who want the truth. But it will take real courage to face the facts candidly. Some of our long-held—even cherished—assumptions may be shaken to their foundations. I bid you to read on with an honest heart and open mind.
Carl Needham
Questions In The Sky by Carl Needham - Part One - Download This Free Booklet - Click Here - © Copyright 2010 Earth Orbit Pty Ltd all rights reserved.
“We can chart our future clearly and
wisely only when we know the path which
has led to the present.”
Adlai Stevenson
“The farther backward you can look, the
farther forward you are likely to see.”
Winston Churchill
“The present contains nothing more than
the past, and what is found in the effect
was already in the cause.”
Henri Bergson
“Time is the wisest counsellor.”
Pericles
The inhabitants of Earth are being systematically marshalled into a compliant state. “Globalisation” is a euphemism for a long-planned totalitarian government on a planetary scale, affecting every detail of our lives. The means of accomplishing this sweeping goal are legion and concerted. What is taking place above our heads is just one of the numerous multifunctional “weapons” designed to facilitate complete control over the bodies, minds and souls of every human being on Earth.
That aerosol spraying is taking place globally cannot be credibly denied. And that no government is willing to take responsibility for explaining the phenomenon is in itself both disturbing and revealing. The aerosol trails cannot be dismissed as “normal aviation activity” or even as benign.
Neither can the proliferation of man-made clouds, spread by means of electromagnetic stroking, be explained as consistent with historic meteorological patterns. Attempts to justify it all in terms of “mitigating global warming” are futile.
Nano-technolgy has produced new phenomena that combine aerial and terrestrial components in a deadly mix that is able to decimate entire populations.
Well-meaning activism is now too little too late, regardless of the intensity of personal feelings about it. No amount of placard waving or amassing of signatures will change the outcome. The issue lies far deeper than the merely political level.
It is essential to understand the deep-laid ideology that is driving the accelerating rush to globalism together with its historic roots if we are to truly understand the phenomenon of aerosol spraying in Earth’s atmosphere.
There is cogent evidence of an epic struggle for global domination on every page of history—if we are willing to look beyond the official curricula of both classroom and mainstream media “education”.
Nonetheless, the situation is not hopeless. The entire population of Earth is made up of individuals. Thankfully there is much we can do as individuals to both safeguard our physical survival, and to protect our bodies, minds and spirits.
Some of these measures are surprisingly simple.
Questions Raised High
Sometime around late 1998, unmarked jet aircraft were observed flying over the United States of America, spraying unknown substances into the sky. It quickly became obvious that this was something dramatically out of the ordinary. 1
The spray was left hanging in thick, long, parallel lines that spread out to create “white-out” in what had just before been clear, blue skies.
Other flight patterns were observed, including “chequerboard” cross hatching and also “tick-tack-toe” random paths. The common denominator was the fact that these spray trails behaved very differently from familiar jet contrails: they didn’t go away.
The activity was observed in localities where jet aircraft were not normally known to fly. Often the altitude of the big planes seemed significantly lower than that of commercial jet traffic.
Before long it became a frequent and widespread occurrence.
Since World War II, water vapour trails from the exhaust and airframes of high-altitude jets has been a common sight across the world.
Characteristically, these contrails maintain a fixed distance behind the planes as they traverse the sky, much like the wake of a boat. Contrails always disappear within a very short time. But this new phenomenon was clearly different.
Instead of vanishing in the familiar way, these enormously-long trails persisted, spreading out to cover huge areas, often completely obscuring the blue sky altogether. The phenomenon was observed by thousands of people across the USA.
The internet was peppered with photographs and video taken by perplexed citizens hoping someone would “please explain”. Logical questions were asked of those who had been elected to safeguard their voters’ interests. The many enquiries were consistently met with emphatic rebuttal.
It became obvious that the same “templated” pattern of handling phone-ins was being used across the nation.
The effect of this obfuscation was to arouse suspicion, which ineluctably produced a grass roots movement. As people do when confronted by alarming circumstances, they began to reach out for others with whom some kind of helpful dialogue and collaborative effort might be established.
In the state of New Mexico, ex-government researcher, Clifford E Carnicom, observed the spraying taking place where he had chosen to live because of its pristine environment. He became disturbed by what he saw occurring over his own house. He immediately applied his disciplined and analytical mind to the issue and began conducting experiments to see what was being unceremoniously introduced into the air he must now breathe.
In due course he published his findings on a pioneering Web site. 2
The site immediately became the object of intense interest on the part of numerous government agencies. The log of visitors to the site from the industrial-military complex is long and impressive. The record of “hits” shows that intelligence agencies including the CIA, FBI and the Pentagon were very interested to follow Carnicom’s revelations, albeit in the shadows. Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Honeywell Aerospace and most of the significant aeronautical contractors to the military complex of the USA became regular visitors to the site. Pharmaceutical organisations with heavyweight government contracts also logged on regularly. 3
Carnicom’s attempts to have his findings about the aerosols confirmed by the US EPA were thwarted in a revealing display of stonewalling that lasted two years.4 His subsequent analysis has shown that the aerosols contain a range of metallic particles as well as organic substances which have been identified as pathogenic. All of the known components of the aerosols are toxic. Among them are: barium, strontium, sulphurhexaflouride, aluminium, trimethylaluminium, calcium, metallic nano particles and other, synthetic compounds.
They also contain microscopic polymers—a substance that has a molecular structure consisting mainly, or entirely, of a large number of similar units bonded together to form a fibre. Many synthetic materials used as plastics and resins are polymers.
New diseases have emerged coincident with the widespread dispersal of these aerosols. Persistent upper respiratory tract problems in young children and older people have dramatically increased. In Texas, one of the states first subjected to spraying, Alzheimer’s disease has increased by more than 1000%. Globally, the disease has moved from being just an “old person’s affliction” to now include growing numbers of teenagers. 5
A totally new illness called Morgellon’s disease is spreading rapidly and appears to be directly linked to the aerosol activity. Morgellon’s disease doesn’t respond to any known conventional medical treatment. It is characterised by disfiguring lesions that erupt through the skin, exhibiting synthetic, microscopic fibres. The disease is debilitating and psychologically distressing.
Specific substances, such as barium (forming a radioactive isotope inimical to the normal functioning of the human oncogene that controls cancer), found in the aerosols, have been turning up in the annual rings of trees since 1999. Flora and fauna are affected. The water of Earth’s aquifers is now contaminated by the same toxins that have been identified in the aerosols. Rain water is far from pure anymore. 6
Since 1999, the phenomenon has been observed globally and copiously documented. It is happening where you live.
The amount of particulate material that has now been deposited in our atmosphere since the aerial activity commenced runs to many hundreds of millions of tonnes. Its effects are so significant that weather patterns have now been permanently altered. 7
A new term entered the popular vernacular: “chemtrails”. Its intended meaning is apparent. However, officialdom has denied the existence of any such thing. Some confusion has arisen over this issue because august establishments like NASA freely acknowledge the ubiquitous presence of “persistent contrails”. 8
The “politically correct” point of distinction will not be lost on the thoughtful reader.
One thing remains free of confusion: the aerosols being daily pumped into our atmosphere are not comprised of harmless water condensation or vapour. As such, the expression, “contrail” cannot be properly applied to them.
Around the same time as Clifford Carnicom published his Web site, in Ontario, Brian Holmes began observing the same phenomenon over his property in Canada. He, too, published a site showing photographs of the now-familiar, long, white aerosol trails, together with moderate, clear-headed comments. His “Holmstead” site was also quickly noticed by the same shadowy organisations. Attempts were mounted to intimidate him by sending a black, combat helicopter to hover 20 feet above the chimney of his family home. 9
Rosalind Peterson grew up in Mendocino County, California and had a professional interest in agricultural technology with a focus on live stock, soil, water and flora. At noon on March 27, 2002, her entire life changed after a friend drew her attention to the sky above her home town and asked her some pertinent questions. She began noticing that trees on her property were dying. Her interest drew her into dedicated research and she published a Web site with her findings.
Attention was also focused on her activities and in a different approach from intimidation, Peterson was invited by UN Undersecretary General, Kiyo Akasaka to address the 60th Annual DPI/NGO Conference on Climate Change: How it Impacts Us All. The conference was held at the United Nations headquarters on September, 5-7, 2007. The full transcript of the speech may be downloaded from her Web site. 10
Since then, many others have added their voices to the issue forming the subject of this book.
In January 2004, the German magazine, Raum+Zeit (Space and Time) published an article by Swiss freelance journalist Gabriel Stetter titled, White Skies. The article made a clear link between the disastrous European winter of 2003—during which a dramatic number of people died from the extreme conditions—and the phenomenon of aerosol spraying in the upper atmosphere. 11
Throughout the remainder of this book, the term “aerosol trails” will be used to describe the phenomenon that has become ubiquitous in the skies of Earth since 1999.aerosol |ˈerəˌosôl; -ˌsäl|
noun a substance enclosed under pressure and able to be released as a fine spray, typically by means of a propellant.
• a container holding such a substance.
• Chemistry a colloidal suspension of particles dispersed in air or gas.
Origin 1920s: from aero- + sol. 12
The phenomenon of aerosol trails has now spread across the world. Email is received daily on the BlueNoMore Web site from all continents. Many are accompanied by photographs confirming the extent of this aerial activity. And in recent times new techniques of delivery have been observed. It seems that the long, white aerosol trails may now be considered too conspicuous, and less-detectable means are being tried.
Among these is what I have called “aerosol bursts”. From almost imperceptibly-small “puffs” of white—like anti-aircraft flack—odd-looking clouds rapidly appear in a blue sky. These spread very quickly in all directions at once and join together to form a white overcast. The delivery aircraft are not easy to detect, but the alert observer will see them. Early morning is often the best time to spot such activity as the low-angle of sunlight catches the aircraft superstructure, betraying its presence. It is common to see a thin vapour emerging from such flights without the usual long aerosol trails. The vapour deliquesces and becomes a thick haze that frequently turns to total white out.
In a revealing manoeuvre, atypical of commercial practice, several jets work together, plying back and forth on parallel tracks at the same altitude. Their emissions rapidly combine to form what the average person may think is normal cloud. Such flights are conducted some distance from the regular, published, Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) tracks. It is common to see them in places where no commercial jet flights operate.
Another technique is increasingly common. With this method, the jet leaves very little visible trail. But soon after the plane has moved on, aerosol manifests remotely and at right angles to the aircraft’s track. Extremely long, broad layers or “sheets” of aerosol may be seen to almost “shoot” from the track of the plane and spread out for 20 nautical miles or more in a straight line. These aerosols also merge to form the now familiar white-out that has robbed us of our normal weather.
Other, very subtle techniques are also being used. Much activity takes place at night and above the white-out that has already been laid in place or above naturally-occurring clouds. Aerosol trails may often be observed in the breaks between clouds.
Examples of these more subtle techniques may be found on the Blue No More Web site. 13
Most of the aircraft that are being used began their lives as long-range, mid-air refuelling tankers. They are usually of the KC-10, KC-135R or KC-135E type and have been adapted by Boeing at the request of the US Air Force. Modifications include the fitting of refurbished engines that have been engineered to reduce their decibel output by 85%. 14
This informs us significantly since many of the flights are conducted over heavily populated areas at lower-than-normal altitudes—often at night—and with such frequency that the sheer level of sound would ordinarily draw immediate and unwelcome attention.
A basic fact emerges: if this activity is really for our good, it is incongruous with all that is fair and reasonable for it to be conducted with such consistent stealth, and for fair-minded enquiry to be treated with designed and patronising denial. 15
With these facts on our table it is difficult to avoid the sense that the truth about what is happening in our skies is being deliberately withheld from us. This is an unwelcome realization. Immediately, the spooks of “conspiracy” and “cover-up” begin their baleful wailing in our ears. It is not comfortable. We are, therefore, obliged to examine the matter most carefully.
The stakes appear to be very high indeed.
Numerous Web sites are now dedicated to the issues surrounding “chemtrails”. Some, however, are less than temperate or simply gauche. This can have the effect of making the whole thing seem to be grist for mills turned by the excitable, ill-informed or unstable. If I were charged with the dubious responsibility of disguising what is actually happening, I would be well pleased with such an outcome.
To Continue: Questions In The Sky by Carl Needham - Part One - Download This Free Booklet - Click Here - © Copyright 2010 Earth Orbit Pty Ltd all rights reserved.
[B] Click Here To Go To BlueNoMore.com - A Definitive Study About Chemtrails & Contrails By A Commercial Pilot Trained And Experienced In Cloud Science [/B]


‹ Background of the HAARP Project by Rosalie Bertell, Ph.D., GNSH - 5th November 1996upChemtrail Brochure by CleanAirAndWater.ne