Wikipedia bows to CTKA

[Jim DiEugenio]

Kyle: I forwarded the correction, thanks.

ALbert and Peter, that sounds about right. And this is why we are going to consistently address this issue and try and create a stench.

Sooner or later, the word will get out on this that Wiki is a cover up operation on the major scandals and conspiracies.

[Peter Lemkin]

ALbert and Peter, that sounds about right. And this is why we are going to consistently address this issue and try and create a stench.

Sooner or later, the word will get out on this that Wiki is a cover up operation on the major scandals and conspiracies.

Good luck changing Wiki!...but sending out the 'alarm' so others know is a good thing. I just took a look at Kabila's assassination in the Congo [shouldn't be too controversial], but the strong evidence of US Embassy and CIA involvement is missing [no surprise!].

Yes, I fear it is part of the Mockingbird genre - of which there is SO MUCH! It is (one must admit) a very clever and devious way to put out disinformation, by censorship; as on the surface and to most it seems like the sum total of everyone's viewpoints....far from it!

The thing to do is simply to make a Deep Political Wiki - even Wikis for each Deep Political event. How'z about a JFK Assassination Wiki?! ETC.

[Albert Doyle]

Yes, I fear it is part of the Mockingbird genre - of which there is SO MUCH! It is (one must admit) a very clever and devious way to put out disinformation, by censorship; as on the surface and to most it seems like the sum total of everyone's viewpoints....far from it!

Goebbels would be in awe of how his work was perfected.

[Peter Lemkin]

Yes, I fear it is part of the Mockingbird genre - of which there is SO MUCH! It is (one must admit) a very clever and devious way to put out disinformation, by censorship; as on the surface and to most it seems like the sum total of everyone's viewpoints....far from it!

Goebbels would be in awe of how his work was perfected.

Yes, Indeed! I see that some suggest that 53% of Americans use Wikipedia as their first or one of the first sources of information, when hunting for it on the internet! Many web browsers now come with it installed as one of the search choices installed out of the 'box'.

[Peter Lemkin]

Yes, I fear it is part of the Mockingbird genre - of which there is SO MUCH! It is (one must admit) a very clever and devious way to put out disinformation, by censorship; as on the surface and to most it seems like the sum total of everyone's viewpoints....far from it!

Goebbels would be in awe of how his work was perfected.

Yes, Indeed! I see that some suggest that 53% of Americans use Wikipedia as their first or one of the first sources of information, when hunting for it on the internet! Many web browsers now come with it installed as one of the search choices installed out of the 'box'.

How clever to have correct and detailed information on, for example: the cranberry, the Livingston and Stanley meeting, sunspots, black holes, the atom, etc....and hide in with such informative articles disinformation on who runs things and our real history! A brilliant stroke of hiding important lies in with neutral information and making the whole package 'trusted' by the vast majority of internet users. :wavey:

[Jim DiEugenio]

You know I think the anti-Wikipedia sentiment is out there.

This article I wrote has quickly zoomed to the top of the metrics at CTKA. It is the most read piece we have posted since VInce P. review of the Kennedy Detail. Plus many have hit the links to the JP Mroz articles which preceded it.

I am thinking of creating a whole series on Wiki now. The audience is sure there for it.

[Peter Lemkin]

You know I think the anti-Wikipedia sentiment is out there.

This article I wrote has quickly zoomed to the top of the metrics at CTKA. It is the most read piece we have posted since VInce P. review of the Kennedy Detail. Plus many have hit the links to the JP Mroz articles which preceded it.

I am thinking of creating a whole series on Wiki now. The audience is sure there for it.

I hope you are correct. Certainly some cognoscenti are aware of both the heavy-handed 'moderators' and how Wiki deals with controversial [to TPTB] issues. But, I fear most of the Sheeple trust authority and, here, it is made to seem as if they are trusting themselves, in the aggregate - when in fact on 'certain' issues the game is 'fixed'. The best antidote is to increasingly document the removal of posts and their replacement by either nothing or the 'official' perspective. It goes way beyond 'neutrality' - and in fact is very biased!

[Bernice Moore]

The Wikipedia Fraud Pt. 3: Wales Covers Up for the Warren Commission



http://www.ctka.net/2011/wiki_pt3.html

[Magda Hassan]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Gamaliel

User:Gamaliel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[TABLE="width: 0"]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

"They see me rollin', they hatin'"

[TABLE="class: userboxes, width: 248"]
[TR]
[TD]

[TABLE="width: 238"]
[TR]
en[TD]This user is a native speaker ofEnglish.[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

[TABLE="width: 238"]
[TR]
es-2[TD]Este usuario puede contribuir con un nivel intermedio de español.[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

[TABLE="width: 238"]
[TR]
[TD]This user is an administrator on theEnglish Wikipedia (verify).[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

[TABLE="width: 238"]
[TR]
[TD]This user is one of the 600 most active Wikipedians.[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

[TABLE="width: 238"]
[TR]
[TD]This editor is a Master Editor and is entitled to display this RhodiumEditor Star.[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

[TABLE="width: 238"]
[TR]
[TD]This user has been on Wikipedia for7 years, 7 months and 16 days.[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

[TABLE="width: 238"]
[TR]
[TD]This user has been an admin for
6 years, 10 months and 12 days.[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

[TABLE="width: 238"]
[TR]
[TD]This user is ranked 593 on the list of Wikipedians by number of pages created.[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

[TABLE="width: 238"]
[TR]
[TD]This user has written or expanded27 DYK articles on Wikipedia.[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

[TABLE="width: 240"]
[TR]
[TD="bgcolor: #FFFFFF"][/TD]
[TD]This user is alibrarian/information scientist.[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #FFFFFF"][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

[TABLE="width: 238"]
[TR]
[TD]This user has 99 problems.[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

[TABLE="width: 238"]
[TR]
[TD="bgcolor: #D3D3D3"][/TD]
[TD]This user lives in the
United States of America.[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

[TABLE="width: 238"]
[TR]
[TD]This user lives in the state of
Florida.[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

[TABLE="width: 238"]
[TR]
USF[TD]Go Bulls! This user attends or has attended the
University of South Florida.[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

[TABLE="width: 238"]
[TR]
[TD]This user supports theDemocratic Party of the United States.[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

[TABLE="width: 238"]
[TR]
[TD]This user is a member of
WikiProject Florida.[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

[TABLE="width: 238"]
[TR]
[TD]This user scored 12711 on theWikipediholic test.[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
I am an administrator here so feel free to contact me if you need assistance with anything. I would prefer to be contacted on my user talk page and not by email, but if you need to email me please include your user name and/or IP address in your message. I will generally ignore and/or delete rude and offensive messages. Please do not email me if you wish to discuss your theories about who killed JFK.

Before you rant, please readtips for the angry new user.

Most recent creations: Robin de la Condamine, Frank Ver Beck, John Martin's Book,Clare Turlay Newberry, Henry James (biographer), Lucy Cores, Michael Cores,Alexander Cores, Holland Cotter, Sarah Kaufman (critic), Vineyard Gazette, Mildred Clingerman‎, Edward D. Kuekes, Tom Little (cartoonist), Thomas F. Darcy, John M. Walker, William A. Caldwell, E.R. Shipp, Lewis A. Lapham, Stuart Paine, Ralph Paine, Jr., Ralph Delahaye Paine, Sasha Miller, Pauline Ashwell, Jane Rice, George Crile, Jr., Babette Rosmond, Malcolm Venville, Georgine Darcy,Marjorie Constance Caserio, Mary Letitia Caldwell, Reinhold and Ruth Benesch, Fay Ajzenberg-Selove, Machine of Death, Charles Fraser MacLean, Vezdaea schuyleriana, William Hamilton (cartoonist), Vaughn Shoemaker, Frankie Hewitt, Ramón Eduardo Ruiz, Stanley Nider Katz, Rachel Bodley, Women's Centennial Congress, Viola Florence Barnes, Mary Frances Winston Newson, Pauline Sperry, Ellen Hayes

What I'm proudest of and spent more time working on than anything else are my contributions to Lee Harvey Oswald. The Oswald entry is even mentioned in a newspaper article (broken link) on wikipedia. If you want to witness insanity firsthand, try monitoring these articles for conspiracy nonsense.

"Proposed general rule: if you launch your complaint on Wikipedia Review, you're already wrong." - Useravid Gerard

I am 74% addicted to wikipedia



creations | To do list | useful links | Sandbox | barnstars | personal endorsements

[Albert Doyle]

I tried to Wikipedia James DiEugenio and there was no entry found on Google.


DiEugenio stands in victory over those cowards from this alone. Congratulations to him for earning the honor of internet "disappearance" by major hypocrites...