Not sure what you mean by "affecting them". I have been reading books on the JFK assassination since the early 70's. I can recommend some good ones if you are interested. And yes some are CIA. Since the truly great books- like Jim Douglass' JFK and the Unspeakable- are ignored by the press and not sold in bookstores it is the public at large that is hurt, not the readers of books.
Burn them all save Case Closed and Remodeling History would be the prime directive of the doo-wop Mockingbirds. Simplify, simplify.
Taking the Elizabeth Taylor/Who's Afraid attitude, "What a dump!" presents as Mr. Yates from Douglass 351-4.
I am continually reading. The notes in Gerald McKnight, Breach of Trust: How the Warren Commission failed the nation and why, are superb.
Reading is only tedious if there is no critical thinking, and/or the "reader" has an a priori conclusion.
Those tired of reading might have something with those "tired of London," but read James Douglass, JFK and the Unspeakable: Why he died and why it matters.
As Seamus suggests, Anthony Summers, though I found his Conspiracy very compelling stuff indeed.
The Assassinations by Jim DiEugenio and Lisa Pease give an excellent interweaving of the true history of the Republic's perfect storm.
Don't miss Gaeton Fonzi, The Last Investigation, for the blind eye Congress took to the truth.
Books are annoying: now that you know the lengths CIA went to to sabotage the trial of a CIA asset they deniedwhat do you do.
In the five volumes of Horne the clear proof of two brain exams, two brains, and when they opened the stainless container, the dinner party gasped.
That tricky Oswald had come back from the grave to foil us once again.
Too many books, too many brains.
Ruth Paine can tell us everything we need to know. Just ask Cass Sunstein, Todd Levanthal, and the Dana Carvey character with the last word on "books": isn't that special.
