Posts: 408
Threads: 14
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Mar 2011
Betrayal in Dallas: LBJ, the Pearl Street Mafia, and the Murder of President Kennedy, [B]Publisher: Skyhorse Publishing (July 1, 2011)[/B]
this the the title of a book by Mark North that i saw in amazon.com. I have not read any of his books, so i don't know if it is a new one or what. The publishing date is 2011. I hope it is not another book about LBJ did it.
Posts: 408
Threads: 14
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Mar 2011
unfortunately it is another LBJ did it book. I don't think will ever see the end of it.
After Wladron's attempt to blame it on the CIA failed and the people did not buy his story, they decided to spice it up a bit to make it easier to swallow.
So they put LBJ in charge of the Mafia, it makes it more believable.
Posts: 17,304
Threads: 3,464
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 2
Joined: Sep 2008
Yes, the Johnson family is very well known in their native Sicily.
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it." Karl Marx
"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.
“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.
Posts: 408
Threads: 14
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Mar 2011
Yes rumors have it his real name was Johnsonelli before his father came to USA.
I made a mistake instead of "After Wladron's attempt to blame it on the CIA failed" i meant "After Wladron's attempt to blame it on the MAFIA failed", sorry!
Posts: 1,473
Threads: 2
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Aug 2009
Mark North's Act of Treason alleges Hoover ordered his agents to suppress pre-assassination evidence of conspiracy.
North now claims Marcello ordered JFK hit and Dallas was selected because RFK targeted the Civello outfit there.
LBJ had begun setting up the Unitarian connections to Albert Schweitzer College in the course of his career predating OSS.
A complement to Waldron-Hartmann Gumbo and Goombas: How Coups and Capos Killed Kennedy While Fishermen Held Flowers.
Robert Harris (JFK History Forum) insists Marcello is the only confessed assassin.
Howard Hunt says the buck stops with Lyndondoes not penetrate to Langley.
Terra Cotta Warriors Chorus Line: Hoover, Johnson, Marcello: one, two, three, kick.
Petraeus leaves Poppystan, Walid Karzai among the burning oil wells.
Eevil Oswald, wicked Osama.
Rinse, repeat.
Posts: 291
Threads: 32
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Dec 2008
Over at the Disinformation forum - I guess you insist it is an arm of some government Intelligence agency - British I assume? - I engaged Mr. Phelps on a few issues and he apparently has read parts of many books and is fixated on Jews, so few people bother to even respond to his posts and he engages in conversations with himself.
Bill Kelly
JFKCountercoup.blogspot.com
Posts: 3,965
Threads: 211
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2008
Speaking only for myself, Bill, I can tell you that I do NOT think that the EF is "an arm of some government Intelligence agency," British or otherwise.
I have made powerful, persuasive arguments that the EF has been infiltrated by agents provocateur whose shared mission is to disinform, disrupt, and mire in unending doubt and pointless argument those researchers who seek truth and justice in the wake of deep political atrocities such as the JFK assassination.
Further, and without any conclusions relating to motive, I have asserted with equal persuasiveness that those who call the shots at EF act, wittingly or not, as accessories to the aforementioned agents.
I put forward those arguments on the EF itself during the period immediately prior to commencement of the disinformation operation that led to my self-banning from that blog.
I invite you to visit the EF and attempt to locate my threads and posts in which I make said arguments. Start with my outing of the disinformation entity known as "Len Colby."
Good luck.
To return to your original conclusion: It represents a rush to illogical judgment wholly uninformed by deep understanding of deep political processes. I hope you know how much respect I have for your JFK research (in particular your Valkyrie work and http://www.JFKCountercoup.blogspot.com ). In light of such significant achievement, your faulty reasoning here is deeply troubling.
Posts: 1,473
Threads: 2
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Aug 2009
In the midst of George Michael Evica's meticulous investigation of Allen Dulles' use of religious organizations (Unitarians, Episcopalians) is the clear view it is the intelligence professional manipulating those individuals, not their vast organizations.
Similarly Charles has consistently cautioned to avoid the use of the broad organizational label when it is the individuals and occasional cadres which are pertinent.
Phelps' regurgitates as a cut-and-paste extruder without off switch and has subsequently been excluded from several groups in which I have participated.
No bars on the participation of mischief-makers on this new-fangled internet, and one of the wittier observations on USG's participation may be found at http://www.techcareersblog.com/2011/04/s...ppets.html
The million-square-foot NSA facility in Utah builds now so Big Brother may friend lots of people and tweet them in their millions.
Any particular forum would be merely so much digital real estate, to be traversed at will depending upon the bright and shiny helmet heads.
One thing is clear, wherever two or more are engaged in cogent and productive discussion of the crimes of the security state, there you will find those puppets.
Goebbels' girls in a reactionary View, dishing dirt, Girlfriend.
Posts: 291
Threads: 32
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Dec 2008
Charles Drago Wrote:Speaking only for myself, Bill, I can tell you that I do NOT think that the EF is "an arm of some government Intelligence agency," British or otherwise.
BK: Then why say they are dizinformation agents, which requires them by definition to be associated with intelligence agency or network?
I have made powerful, persuasive arguments that the EF has been infiltrated by agents provocateur whose shared mission is to disinform, disrupt, and mire in unending doubt and pointless argument those researchers who seek truth and justice in the wake of deep political atrocities such as the JFK assassination.
Further, and without any conclusions relating to motive, I have asserted with equal persuasiveness that those who call the shots at EF act, wittingly or not, as accessories to the aforementioned agents.
I put forward those arguments on the EF itself during the period immediately prior to commencement of the disinformation operation that led to my self-banning from that blog.
I invite you to visit the EF and attempt to locate my threads and posts in which I make said arguments. Start with my outing of the disinformation entity known as "Len Colby."
BK: So then who is Colby working for again?
Good luck.
To return to your original conclusion: It represents a rush to illogical judgment wholly uninformed by deep understanding of deep political processes. I hope you know how much respect I have for your JFK research (in particular your Valkyrie work and http://www.JFKCountercoup.blogspot.com ). In light of such significant achievement, your faulty reasoning here is deeply troubling.
BK: What was my original conclusion and rush to illogical judgement wholly uninformed by a deep understanding of deep political processes again? I forget.
BK
Posts: 3,965
Threads: 211
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2008
Bill,
Please try to be logical here and read my response carefully.
You ask, "Then why say they are dizinformation [sic] agents, which requires them by definition to be associated with intelligence agency or network?"
Who is the "they" you reference and I don't?
Next you ask, "What was my original conclusion and rush to illogical judgement wholly uninformed by a deep understanding of deep political processes again?"
I'll try one more time: Your original conclusion, in your own words, was that I "insist [EF] is an arm of some government Intelligence agency". I made no such claim -- ever -- either here or on EF. Your inference is unjustified, absent all logic, let alone supporting evidence, and at variance with what we might expect from a seasoned observer of deep politics at work.
Finally you ask, "So then who is Colby working for again?" I reiterate, I have demonstrated that the entity calling itself "Colby" is in fact comprised of more than one writer. I illustrated this reality by demonstrating the disparities among numerous "Colby" posts.
And by the way, I place the name "Colby" within quotation marks because it is a fictive construct designed to spread disinformation and sow disharmony among individuals who should be acting as comrades.
Like you and me.
Who is "Colby" working for?
Ultimately, the forces that struck JFK.
Have you learned nothing from our struggles? Do you not understand that we are at war?
Out with it, Bill. Why the hair across your ass?
|
