19-11-2011, 02:17 PM (This post was last modified: 19-11-2011, 02:36 PM by Bernice Moore.)
SURPRISE;AS IF WE DIDN'T KNOW WHEN AT FIRST THE ADVERTISING BEGAN....ANOTHER BORING..LNR EPISODE...GARBAGE IN BY GARBAGE, SO GARBAGE GETS GARBAGE OUT..NOTHING NEW, SO PREDICTABLE... http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/11/...latestnews.........
THE SHADOWY FIGURE IN THE HUGHES FILM, MOVING IN THE WINDOW HAS BEEN KNOWN ABOUT FOR YEARS, THEY SAY A SHADOWY FIGURE, HERE WE GO AGAIN, LIKE POINTING OUT A SHADOWED FOGURE TO BE ZAP IN A BLACKENED PERGOLA,IN A PHOTO, WE ARE GOING TO BE ASKED THAT ANOTHER SHADOW CLEARLY SHOWS LHO.....:loco:.....I DO WISH THEY WOULD GET A LIFE, POORLY DONE AGAIN, POORLY DONE...
THEIR GARBAGE IS BECOMING CLEAR NOT ONLY THE BULLET AND THE SHADOW IN WINDOW POSITIVE TO BE LHO, YEAH AND I NOW HAVE A BRIDGE FOR SALE, IN BROOKLYN..:rofl: IN THE FIRST LINK BELOW, IT STATES THEY ALSO PROVE GUESS WHAT, NO GRASSY KNOLL SHOT, IT APPEARS THEY ARE REALLY LETTING ALL KNOW JUST WHAT POINTS THEY ARE VERY CONCERNED A BOUT, LHO OF COURSE AS HE CANNOT BE PLACED AT THE WINDOW, ESPECIALLY, AS I AM BETTING WE SHALL SEE IT AS A SHADOWY FIGURE,, LIKE HALO...BUT ALSO THE BULLET, AND NOW THE GRASSY KNOLL, I HOPE THEY KEEP RAMBLING, THE MORE THEY DO THE MORE WE LEARN, WHERE THEIR HEADS AND MOUTHS ARE AT THIS POINT IN TIME...:gossip::pBESIDE UP THEIR YOU KNOW WHATS...:rofl::cleanears:
Subject: Oswald was lone gunman, upcoming film argues - NO GRASSY KNOLL SHOT
IT APPEARS THE CONTINUED WORK DISOLVING I SHALL SAY THE CRAPPY ZAPPY, HAS, IS PAYING OFF, AS IT IS AND HAS BEEN SHOWN TO HAVE TOO MANY HOLES, THIS LINK PRINTS THAT THEY NO LONGER ARE COUNTING ON THE HAPPY ZAPPY, TO BE THE BE ALL OF THE ASSASSINATION, I TAKE THIS AS GOOD INFORMATION, ALL THE WORK ON IT'S FLAWS APPEARS TO HAVE GOTTEN AROUND, GUESS BY WHOM..I AM THINKING, .THE ONE THAT HAUNTS THE FORUMS, DAY AND NIGHT AND REPORTS BACK TO HIS BOSSES BOSSES, BOSSES :gossip:hock:
I'm reading Mark Lane, Last Word: My Indictment of the CIA in the Murder of JFK. He would certainly have fun one-on-one with Max Holland.
Do we really need whiz-bang digital enhancement. Oswald wasn't on the sixth floor. The head shot didn't come from the sixth floor. Oswald didn't have GSR on his cheek--per DPD and AEC's Oak Ridge Lab, though seven test shooters of the MC did have. But then Oswald didn't order, purchase, receive, practice with, transport or use the MC per Gil Jesus http://www.jfklancerforum.com/dc/dcboard...g_id=85804 "10 REASONS WHY I BELIEVE THE "OSWALD RIFLE" ISN'T OSWALD'S" Similar proofs from George Michael Evica and Charles Drago https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...-the-RifleEvica on the Carcano: Oswald Never Possessed the Rifle
Eleven seconds? How could one tell from the film--one clear frame followed by a blurred one; a black trapezoid on the rear of JFK's head. A bubble gum wound with no spray to account for Hargis.
Gerald D. McKnight in Breach of Trust: How the Warren Commission Failed the Nation and Why, Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, and Sylvia Meagher, Accessories After the Fact, plus another fifty solid researchers' works have nailed the coffin shut on the putrid corpse of complicity and coverup.
There is no end to what the CIA can prove digitally. While the FBI dispatched Dartmouth's Hany Farid to go la-la-la-I-can't-hear-you past the Backyard Photo graveyard, nose shadow add-on and all, the CIA presents the cartoon of TWA Flight 800 which ignores the missile seen by a hundred or more, the evidence of explosive residue, etcetera.
Surely Ptolemy can prove circular orbits with a few more epicycles.
Give Langley just one more "documentary" on a Mockingbird channel with yet one more shrieking fairy or carping harpy of the Confusatorium.
Thanks Phil; well put, LHO in the window on the 6th floor of the mausoleum, reminds me of the good ole chicken bones, that were there from lunch, but were not, and if they could not even get old chicken bones correct as being in the nest, then how in the h could anyone ever expect them to get LHO there, impossible, and is and was...:loco:....Much crap on the web, one cannot keep up with it, the once a year know it all's have been and are appearing, they like to see their name as author.take care...b.
What gets to me is how the 'Daily Mail' presents a headline that suggests it has shown anything close to evidence. The shady figure in the window is obviously the same people whom the other witnesses saw with the tan jacket etc. There needs to be some kind of media disinformation act that leaves those newspapers open to lawsuits for not presenting the full Douglass level of known fact on the Kennedy Assassination to the public.
Hi Albert;
Now that could be a scathingly brilliant idea......we will not be holding our breaths however, but I LIKE
IT..Here is another,with a bit more information added, DO NOT FORGET TONIGHT, IT'S FIRST PERFORMANCE.......LOL.......... http://www.thefastertimes.com/news/2011/...ssination/ .:director:
Only review on bullet crapola, so far that i have found.....:dancingman:b[URL="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2063459/End-JFK-conspiracy-theories-Digital-technology-proves-Lee-Harvey-Oswald-acted-alone.html?ito=feeds-newsxml"]
"Shadowy figure: The team also found footage which showed a person they think is Oswald moving on the sixth floor of Texas School Book Depository building"
IS BECOMING CLEAR NOT ONLY THE BULLET AND THE SHADOW IN WINDOW POSITIVE TO BE LHO, YEAH AND I NOW HAVE A BRIDGE FOR SALE, IN BROOKLYN..:rofl: IN THE FIRST LINK BELOW, IT STATES THEY ALSO PROVE GUESS WHAT, NO GRASSY KNOLL SHOT, IT APPEARS THEY ARE REALLY LETTING ALL KNOW JUST WHAT POINTS THEY ARE VERY CONCERNED A BOUT, LHO OF COURSE AS HE CANNOT BE PLACED AT THE WINDOW, ESPECIALLY, AS I AM BETTING WE SHALL SEE IT AS A SHADOWY FIGURE,, LIKE HALO...BUT ALSO THE BULLET, AND NOW THE GRASSY KNOLL, I HOPE THEY KEEP RAMBLING, THE MORE THEY DO THE MORE WE LEARN, WHERE THEIR HEADS AND MOUTHS ARE AT THIS POINT IN TIME...:gossip::pBESIDE UP THEIR YOU KNOW WHATS...:rofl::cleanears:
hock:
:director: