20-02-2012, 02:32 PM
Over the past twelve months, the Deep Politics Forum has been penetrated by a cadre of self-described newcomers to the JFK assassination investigation. Their shared modus operandi is to underscore their respective unfamiliarity with the facts of the case and with the investigative methods of deep political inquiry, and then humbly suggest that LHO either may have played a sinister role in the conspiracy or in fact been the lone assassin, and/or attempt to breed dissension among research colleagues by making furious and wholly unsupportable arguments about controversial aspects of the evidence.
As is well known to friends and foes of DPF, this forum has built its JFK Assassination section on the following premise: Anyone with reasonable access to the evidence who does not conclude that John Fitzgerald Kennedy was killed by conspirators is cognitively impaired and/or complicit in the crime.
Further, the founders/owners of DPF have concluded that the assassination cover-up is ongoing and that forums such as ours are regularly targeted for disruption.
The latter awareness compels us to be ever vigilant for hostile penetrations and to counter such actions by, among other means, terminating and publicly exposing them.
Those whose mission it is to undermine DPF and other JFK-focused forums routinely attempt to foster and exploit false perceptions of forum vulnerabilities.
Because of DPF's commitment to engage and expose agents provocateur, its founders/owners often are described by hostile entities as autocratic masters of an "our way or the highway" forum -- one where dissenting views are not tolerated. "Evidence" proffered in support of these ludicrous claims often takes the form of weaponized -- or, if you prefer, intentional -- mischaracterizations of our treatment of likely and known disinformation sources.
Most recently, DPF has been disrupted by two highly suspect posters. One such entity identified itself with two initials in place of a "first" name -- and in so doing played a version of the doppelganger game by mimicking the construction of a recently arrived legitimate poster's name. The entity was quickly identified as such and banned.
And then there's the "Cinque" character, whose laughable, ignorant, vehemently espoused arguments relating to the Altgens 6 photograph disrupted long-standing friendships and alliances between and among researchers and otherwise prompted the significant waste of time, talent, and other invaluable resources on yet another JFK assassination chimera.
"Cinque" too -- whether a committed agent provocateur or simply a fool -- has been identified and banned.
Why the quotation marks/inverted commas around the name "Cinque," you ask? The usage began on another forum, where I and others identified and outed what we concluded was a hydra-headed disinformation team manifesting as someone named "Colby."
As penetrations of DPF become more frequent, so too will our counter-actions. This more than likely will lead to increasing public characterizations of DPF as the home of closed and paranoid minds.
We are flattered by the attention.
Form your own conclusions.
As is well known to friends and foes of DPF, this forum has built its JFK Assassination section on the following premise: Anyone with reasonable access to the evidence who does not conclude that John Fitzgerald Kennedy was killed by conspirators is cognitively impaired and/or complicit in the crime.
Further, the founders/owners of DPF have concluded that the assassination cover-up is ongoing and that forums such as ours are regularly targeted for disruption.
The latter awareness compels us to be ever vigilant for hostile penetrations and to counter such actions by, among other means, terminating and publicly exposing them.
Those whose mission it is to undermine DPF and other JFK-focused forums routinely attempt to foster and exploit false perceptions of forum vulnerabilities.
Because of DPF's commitment to engage and expose agents provocateur, its founders/owners often are described by hostile entities as autocratic masters of an "our way or the highway" forum -- one where dissenting views are not tolerated. "Evidence" proffered in support of these ludicrous claims often takes the form of weaponized -- or, if you prefer, intentional -- mischaracterizations of our treatment of likely and known disinformation sources.
Most recently, DPF has been disrupted by two highly suspect posters. One such entity identified itself with two initials in place of a "first" name -- and in so doing played a version of the doppelganger game by mimicking the construction of a recently arrived legitimate poster's name. The entity was quickly identified as such and banned.
And then there's the "Cinque" character, whose laughable, ignorant, vehemently espoused arguments relating to the Altgens 6 photograph disrupted long-standing friendships and alliances between and among researchers and otherwise prompted the significant waste of time, talent, and other invaluable resources on yet another JFK assassination chimera.
"Cinque" too -- whether a committed agent provocateur or simply a fool -- has been identified and banned.
Why the quotation marks/inverted commas around the name "Cinque," you ask? The usage began on another forum, where I and others identified and outed what we concluded was a hydra-headed disinformation team manifesting as someone named "Colby."
As penetrations of DPF become more frequent, so too will our counter-actions. This more than likely will lead to increasing public characterizations of DPF as the home of closed and paranoid minds.
We are flattered by the attention.
Form your own conclusions.
