20-02-2012, 09:08 AM
Peter Lemkin Wrote:We do seem to be getting a rash of naive or playing naive types, lately. Several trying to draw out the opinions of older member and then putting up a completely impossible theory implicating LHO as being with the assassins. My hunch is these are not independent actions, but coordinated....just my gut feeling. Sunstein stuff. McAdams stuff. Pozner stuff. Russo stuff. Big Lie stuff.
Oswald was operational that day. Likely told to keep his eye out on possible attempts on JFK as he likely did [or was made to look like he did] in Chicago. He was NOT on the 6th floor and never had a rifle that day, nor was he ever a part of the assassination! Period! It is unclear exactly when or what triggered in him that he was being set up. I'd imagine as soon as the shots were fired he'd know something was very wrong. As he was seen to be calm in the lunchroom he was either not yet aware he was being set-up or a very cool operative. By soon after he had left the TSBD he was aware, IMO, that he had been set-up...or that idea was growing in his head. He did not kill Tippit, but did go to the Texas theater [apparently so did another person using his identity], likely to meet a contact for exfiltration from Dallas, protection or further instructions. He was moving around from seat to seat, as his contact wasn't there. When he saw the police enter he knew the fix was in, and he did his best until he was silenced - silenced because he could speak to being innocent and having been an agent long in the employ of Naval Intel, CIA, FBI and maybe one other agency....and set-up as the patsy. Revisionist versions of Oswald did it won't fly - especially here.
I concur with you Pete. Indeed I think Oliver Stones breakdown in JFK was pretty bloody good.
"In the Kennedy assassination we must be careful of running off into the ether of our own imaginations." Carl Ogelsby circa 1992
