What Killed Arafat?

[Magda Hassan]

Worth a try but no cigar there. :mexican:
And, well, he would say that wouldn't he?

[Magda Hassan]

There is no reason in the world why there should not be an exhumation. His wife has asked for it. The laboratory has offered to help. The P.A. have said yes. It is technically possible. He is buried in Palestinian territory. There are no religious proscriptions against such a thing if it is to ascertain if a crime has been committed against the deceased. Let's see what road block Israel puts up here. :ballchain:

[Peter Lemkin]

There is no reason in the world why there should not be an exhumation. His wife has asked for it. The laboratory has offered to help. The P.A. have said yes. It is technically possible. He is buried in Palestinian territory. There are no religious proscriptions against such a thing if it is to ascertain if a crime has been committed against the deceased. Let's see what road block Israel puts up here. :ballchain:

Israel can only try to thwart it by propaganda. More worring, as reported on Al Jazeera and elsewhere, some UNNAMED person[s] in the PA have now objected...they should be looked at most closely as to WHY they object, IMHO! The other real negative is the destruction by the French Military lab of blood and urine samples of Arafat. How convenient. They were kept until 2008 [they say...], then 'routinely destroyed' [remind anyone of anything in the JFK or RFK case?]....something very suspicious there and a loss, but the evidence will always remain in Arafat's remains!!! Do the tests! Even though the half-life is 138 days, or so, it will be detectable for a few more years, at least - and it is an easy calculation back to the original amounts present. The relative locations in different organs could well tell the mode of poisoning and even the timing of it. In fact, a highly detailed and competent autopsy, even at this late date, could tell a hell of a lot! Interesting that some don't want one to be done. What have they to hide?! My guess is it will eventually be found that the French Military lab destroyed the samples when Suha Arafat requested them some weeks back.

[Magda Hassan]

I sort of expect them to come up with some obscure by law which will make it hard for the exhumation to go ahead. Just like they do for the demolitions. Make all legal and nice like.

They would be better off just letting it go ahead and dealing with the consequences. It wont stop their assassinations in any case and their not about to comply with international law any time soon either.

Yes, interesting these PA members now objecting....May be some of these mentioned here may well be in the picture: https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/arc...6146.html? and here: [URL="https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-1858.html?"]https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-1858.html?

[/URL]

[Peter Lemkin]

I just watched the Al Jazeera documentary What Killed Arafat again. Many of the doctors [there were many, from many teams from many countries] were AFRAID to talk. That doesn't mean they were complicit [though a few might have been], but sure does show that they sense that murder was involved and don't care to become ensnared in that! One absolutely had panic in his voice and would only say, 'This is not a medical matter, but a political matter!' :mexican::mexican: Also interesting from the excellent documentary [made by one of his bodyguards who is now an investigative journalist] is that given the half-life of Polonium-210 and the time since Arafat's death the initial dose would have been almost exactly the same as that Litveninko was given!!!!!

[Albert Doyle]

Al Jazeera documetary well worth watching:



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBT7o0piZ...e=youtu.be

[Albert Doyle]

Worth a try but no cigar there. :mexican:
And, well, he would say that wouldn't he?

I just figured out in my head that the high polonium level in Arafat's toothbrush proves that the polonium could not have been planted. If the polonium had been planted the distribution level would be fairly even due to the decay rate of the planted polonium being constant. The fact there was a significant level shift in the toothbrush shows that the poison was first introduced orally and masticated, creating the higher level in the mouth and teeth. This is the exact forensic pathology you would expect to see in such a food poisoning case. And it is also one that denies any suggestion of planted polonium. This is a forensic snapshot of the freshest most concentrated levels of polonium first showing up in the mouth because the freshest most concentrated level of polonium was present in the poisoned food Arafat ate. It's a forensic bullseye and smoking gun proof.

[Keith Millea]

This is a forensic snapshot of the freshest most concentrated levels of polonium first showing up in the mouth because the freshest most concentrated level of polonium was present in the poisoned food Arafat ate. It's a forensic bullseye and smoking gun proof.

TOOTHPASTE.......:curtain:

[Albert Doyle]

TOOTHPASTE.......:curtain:

No, my dear Watson. The witnesses said he became ill after eating dinner.


My guess is the CIA/Mossad murderers would want him to ingest the polonium deeply with food rather than brush and spit it out. Less evidence that way too like a hot toothpaste tube.

[Peter Lemkin]

Having taken epidemiology coursework, let me assure you, there are several features which make recent 'planting' of Polonium in his effects neigh impossible. This is going to be a hard one, once fully investigated, to not point at poisoning...but, hey, 911 or Dallas are blatant lies they keep giving life to...so they will certainly do the same here using the same worn-out propaganda techniques.....with some believing the lies because it is easier on their consciences, and some because they simply trust authority.

Never trust authority! In fact, never believe anything is true until it is officially denied. :kraka: