My goodness I think the EF got it right. It wasn't just Israel, but they were a major player. I was partly righthock:
Jim Phelps and Miko Rago are impressive researchers, imo. Best JFK thread I've seen.
And some very interesting names appear in the troll sideshow.
Are you joking Mark? Rago? Your standards must be terribly low. Or you have read little of the entity going by Mike Rago over there.
Are you aware that your buddy is on record as saying her has never read a boook on the JFK assassination. Gets his info from Warren Commmission.
Ya very impressive. :zzzz:
I don't follow the JFK threads religiously there or even here these days. I just take a look occasionally, so I'm not fully informed about who's said what recently.
Of course, I should have mentioned it's a JFK/RFK thread, not just JFK, but I think the scenario presented by Jim Phelps about the JFK assassination just about nails it, imo. The research by Phelps and Miko Rago is impressive and I stand by this. Btw, who gives a rat's ass whether Mike Rago is an alias or not? It's the contribution to the body of knowledge which is more important in my view. If he is using an alias he probably has his reasons.
I think it's time that researchers acknowledged the probability of Israeli involvement in both these tragic events. Sadly, many appear to lack the maturity to do this and fly off into tantrums rather than look at the evidence.
It's disappointing but predictable to see the choir of usual suspects noisily trying to derail the conversation on that thread, some of whom I previously thought were genuinely interested in what happened in Dealey Plaza that day. Fortunately, they didn't succeed.
"Rago" is the laughing stock of the legitimate JFK research community. To give credence to anything "he" might proffer is a self-indictment of immense proportions.
hock:
