If You Could Prove Lee Harvey Oswald Was Guilty, You Could Win $25,000!

[Adele Edisen]

From Treefrog:

Here's a link for you to send:

http://www.foxcharlotte.com/news/top-sto...51741.html

or

http://tinyurl.com/bne3kmx

____________________________________________________________________________________

Adele

[Greg Burnham]

From Treefrog:

Here's a link for you to send:

http://www.foxcharlotte.com/news/top-sto...51741.html

or

http://tinyurl.com/bne3kmx

____________________________________________________________________________________

Adele

No offense to you or to Barry, Adele, but look at the drivel in the comments section that this has elicited from the cheap seats?
Some say it's the Jooz again, Boner say it's LBJ. Yada yada yada...

[Adele Edisen]

From Treefrog:

Here's a link for you to send:

http://www.foxcharlotte.com/news/top-sto...51741.html

or

http://tinyurl.com/bne3kmx

____________________________________________________________________________________

Adele

No offense to you or to Barry, Adele, but look at the drivel in the comments section that this has elicited from the cheap seats?
Some say it's the Jooz again, Boner say it's LBJ. Yada yada yada...

Greg,

I already did read a few. They won't win the prize.

I still go back to the police evidence of no nitrate on Oswald's cheek(s). He did not fire a rifle or carbine. Not the Mauser or the Mannlicher.

Also, 70-80% of Americans are still not convinced he did it, or did it alone.

I guess I should read his book now.

Please give me a call when you can.

Adele

[Bill Kelly]

You can't prove Oswald did it because he didn't, but it can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt that he is innocent.

BK

[Phil Dragoo]

Adele

I enjoyed very much Barry Krusch, Impossible: The Case Against Lee Harvey Oswald, Part One.

What he does with the three, no, two, no, three shells, and their trip to DC with the FBI while remaining in Dallas with the police, while being initialled and not initialled, photographed, but after they were in someone's pocket, is an exhausting, necessary and droll trip into the vast labyrith of lies which is the Commission's opus.

Regarding the paraffin test on Lee's cheek being negative per the Dallas Police, it was confirmed negative by the AEC's Oak Ridge Lab, which also tested seven men who actually fired the Mannlicher Carcano, all seven testing positive.

The government "expert" Cunningham claimed the weapon's assembly was "too tight" to leave GSR, but this was obviously destroyed by the testing of the known shooters as positives.

Gerald D. McKnight, Breach of Trust: How the Warren Commission Failed the Nation and Why, is clear on this and many other points which are elements of systematic obstruction of justice.

Breach of Trust p 422 note 83

Assassination researcher Harold Weisberg sued both the FBI and the AEC to gain disclosure of the results of the December-January Oak Ridge National Laboratory tests on the paraffin casts. He made no headway with the FBI, but the AEC's successor, the Energy Research and Development Administration (ERDA), anxious to avoid litigation, turned over the results to Weisberg in July 1981. The ERDA file can be found at the Weisberg Archive. The Commission turned to FBI firearms expert Cortlandt Cunningham, whose testimony was buried in Appendix X of the Warren Report under the rubric "Expert Testimony" to explain why Oswald's negative paraffin test on his right cheek was of no evidentiary value. Ignoring the results of the FBI's own authorized AEC tests on the rifle as well as Dr. Guinn's report to Gallagher, Cunningham testified that the chamber of the Mannlicher-Carcano was so tightly sealed that it prevented any blowback. It was Cunningham's professional opinion that given the construction of the weapon, "personally" he would not expect to find "any residues on a person's right cheek after firing" it. See WCR, 561

[David Josephs]

You can't prove Oswald did it because he didn't, but it can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt that he is innocent.

BK

Innocent until PROVEN guilty... not the other way around.

What I believe we can do is refute each and every argument for the GUILT of Oswald in the assassination of JFK and killing of Tippit.
Which shows that he could not be GUILTY beyond a reasonable doubt...

Innocent? That remains to be seen.... imho

DJ

[Adele Edisen]

Adele

I enjoyed very much Barry Krusch, Impossible: The Case Against Lee Harvey Oswald, Part One.

What he does with the three, no, two, no, three shells, and their trip to DC with the FBI while remaining in Dallas with the police, while being initialled and not initialled, photographed, but after they were in someone's pocket, is an exhausting, necessary and droll trip into the vast labyrith of lies which is the Commission's opus.

Regarding the paraffin test on Lee's cheek being negative per the Dallas Police, it was confirmed negative by the AEC's Oak Ridge Lab, which also tested seven men who actually fired the Mannlicher Carcano, all seven testing positive.

The government "expert" Cunningham claimed the weapon's assembly was "too tight" to leave GSR, but this was obviously destroyed by the testing of the known shooters as positives.

Gerald D. McKnight, Breach of Trust: How the Warren Commission Failed the Nation and Why, is clear on this and many other points which are elements of systematic obstruction of justice.

Breach of Trust p 422 note 83

Assassination researcher Harold Weisberg sued both the FBI and the AEC to gain disclosure of the results of the December-January Oak Ridge National Laboratory tests on the paraffin casts. He made no headway with the FBI, but the AEC's successor, the Energy Research and Development Administration (ERDA), anxious to avoid litigation, turned over the results to Weisberg in July 1981. The ERDA file can be found at the Weisberg Archive. The Commission turned to FBI firearms expert Cortlandt Cunningham, whose testimony was buried in Appendix X of the Warren Report under the rubric "Expert Testimony" to explain why Oswald's negative paraffin test on his right cheek was of no evidentiary value. Ignoring the results of the FBI's own authorized AEC tests on the rifle as well as Dr. Guinn's report to Gallagher, Cunningham testified that the chamber of the Mannlicher-Carcano was so tightly sealed that it prevented any blowback. It was Cunningham's professional opinion that given the construction of the weapon, "personally" he would not expect to find "any residues on a person's right cheek after firing" it. See WCR, 561

Phil,

Thank you for that clear confirmation of the nitrate test on Oswald. It seems incredible that factual evidence of that solid a nature was so buried, hidden, and ignored that the beliefs in Oswald's guilt in being the shooter could continue to be perpetuated by so many for 49 years.

Adele

[Phil Dragoo]

Adele

Our proofs, our truth has never been further than our reach.

When the principal spoke through the intercom to send the thousands of students home for the weekend I'm sure most of us had no doubt of some sense of finality to the solution, no matter the ragged serge, the dangling threads.

Only later did we doubt, and build doubt upon doubt.

Surely they fought kings just as we'd learned there in those halls of learning or re-education, enlightenment or indoctrination--he wasn't guilty: he'd not been tried.

Now we echo Holmes to Watson in The Adventure of the Three Garridebs, "Touch him where I would, he is false."

Yet Hanks the billionaire buffoon and his crotchety pet crank Bugs Leone, insist, "If Oswald didn't shoot Kennedy from that building, then Kennedy was not shot."

In our Orwellian world a "government investigation" uses a myriad of memory holes; it is The Matrix which is as yet perceived as only an entertainment paradigm, not a scale model of the Ministry of Journalism & Justice.

We Snoop, We Blackmail, We Terminate, We Turn Now to Dancing With Fat Trannies and remind you as a public service, face the facial-recognition cameras and do not smile for Utah.

That's why I liked the first of Krusch, he's taking every anomaly and running it back and forth through his hands like a Rosary, a rite of Exorcism.

We're in a trance of the Boring-Burger making using bits of hair from Dealey and a scrap of clothing from a wardrobe malfunction of a Potemkin Culture.

Western Civilization has been hollowed out and, the USC to the contrary notwithstanding, POTUS may now terminate by drone what no jury has found guilty.

In my view the words of Gates to Leahy are a springboard to understanding, "Senator, nations lie to each other; it's how business gets done."

The Warren Commission is not evidence of guilt other than that of the business leaders and their model du jour.

We hold the mimes' tennis ball.

Do we give it back?

[Adele Edisen]

Adele

Our proofs, our truth has never been further than our reach.

When the principal spoke through the intercom to send the thousands of students home for the weekend I'm sure most of us had no doubt of some sense of finality to the solution, no matter the ragged serge, the dangling threads.

Only later did we doubt, and build doubt upon doubt.

Surely they fought kings just as we'd learned there in those halls of learning or re-education, enlightenment or indoctrination--he wasn't guilty: he'd not been tried.

Now we echo Holmes to Watson in The Adventure of the Three Garridebs, "Touch him where I would, he is false."

Yet Hanks the billionaire buffoon and his crotchety pet crank Bugs Leone, insist, "If Oswald didn't shoot Kennedy from that building, then Kennedy was not shot."

In our Orwellian world a "government investigation" uses a myriad of memory holes; it is The Matrix which is as yet perceived as only an entertainment paradigm, not a scale model of the Ministry of Journalism & Justice.

We Snoop, We Blackmail, We Terminate, We Turn Now to Dancing With Fat Trannies and remind you as a public service, face the facial-recognition cameras and do not smile for Utah.

That's why I liked the first of Krusch, he's taking every anomaly and running it back and forth through his hands like a Rosary, a rite of Exorcism.

We're in a trance of the Boring-Burger making using bits of hair from Dealey and a scrap of clothing from a wardrobe malfunction of a Potemkin Culture.

Western Civilization has been hollowed out and, the USC to the contrary notwithstanding, POTUS may now terminate by drone what no jury has found guilty.

In my view the words of Gates to Leahy are a springboard to understanding, "Senator, nations lie to each other; it's how business gets done."

The Warren Commission is not evidence of guilt other than that of the business leaders and their model du jour.

We hold the mimes' tennis ball.

Do we give it back?

Thank you, Phil. So very well said.

Adele