11-08-2013, 08:12 AM
@ P. Lemkin. You misread my posts on the Ed-F., otherwise you'd know, that I am a CTer. I am a CT since 1991, when I first saw Stones JFK. - I made no snide comments about your Ed- F. ban. Thx.
KK
KK
|
Reclaiming Parkland
|
19-08-2013, 05:11 PM
The LN Fable CANNOT survive the transcript of the Press Conference by the attending medical persons at Parkland.
My guess is Hanks and Bugliosi will IGNORE the transcript, and focus on the "confusion of the day" and the fable to the exclusion of all else. Most especially the TRUTH.
Read not to contradict and confute;
nor to believe and take for granted; nor to find talk and discourse; but to weigh and consider. FRANCIS BACON 
19-08-2013, 08:52 PM
Q: Can you describe his neck wound? . . .
DR. PERRY: The neck wound, as visible on the patient, revealed a bullet hole almost in the mid line. Q: What was that? DR. PERRY: / bullet hole almost in the mid line. Q: Would you demonstrate? DR. PERRY: In the lower portion of the neck, in front. Q. Can you demonstrate, Doctor, on your own neck? DR. PERRY: Approximately here (indicating). Q. Below the Adam's apple? DR. PERRY: Below the Adam's apple. Q. Doctor, it is the assumption that it was through the head? DR. PERRY: That would be on(ly) conjecture on my part. There are two wounds, as Dr. Clark noted, one of the neck and one of the head. Whether they are directly related or related to two bullets, I cannot say. Q. Where was the entrance wound? DR. PERRY: There was an entrance wound in the neck. As regards the one in the head, I cannot say. Q. Which way was the bullet coming on the neck wound? At him? DR. PERRY: It appeared to be coming at him. . . . Q. Doctor, describe the entrance wound. You think from the front in the throat? DR. PERRY: The wound appeared to be an entrance wound in the front of the throat; yes, that is correct. The exit wound, I don't know. It could have been the head or there could have been a second wound of the head. There was not time to determine this at the particular instant. Q. Would the bullet have had to travel up from the neck wound to exit through the back? DR. PERRY: Unless it was deviated from its course by striking bone or some other object. . . . Phil's footnote: Have they sanitized the youtube of this exchange, or entered a cloaking algorithm in the search engines Hanks and Bugliosi are abetted by the shrieking fairies of the ministry of ruth 
20-08-2013, 12:26 AM
Unless they changed the script after the version I saw, they did ignore the press conference.
As they did Ruby at Parkland, as they did Ruby at the midnight press conference. In my book I devote a chapter to all this. One has to think that Landesman was given his instructions from either Hanks, or someone close to him, or maybe even a notch higher. 
20-08-2013, 12:31 AM
Jim DiEugenio Wrote:Unless they changed the script after the version I saw, they did ignore the press conference.As they did Ruby at the Texas theatre? As they did the other Oswald at the theatre? As they did Ruby talk to journalists at his trial?
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it." Karl Marx
"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her. “I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.
20-08-2013, 02:11 AM
I do not enjoy being correct in my suspicion that Hanks and Co. will ignore the inconvenient FACTS.
This ain't my first rodeo and I have come to expect BS like that from the Ministry of Information (MSM and the like). So I guess it was to be expected by past events. Anyway thanks for the info, Jim Keep up the good work.
Read not to contradict and confute;
nor to believe and take for granted; nor to find talk and discourse; but to weigh and consider. FRANCIS BACON
20-08-2013, 02:23 AM
Peter Lemkin Wrote:==============================================================Karl Kinaski Wrote:Groden: I don't believe, that Groden showed the Zappi film, which implies a second shooter, in the US telly, out of his own free will. Surprise, surprise, surprise. Thanks for the heads up.
Read not to contradict and confute;
nor to believe and take for granted; nor to find talk and discourse; but to weigh and consider. FRANCIS BACON
21-08-2013, 06:59 PM
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter
22-08-2013, 03:58 AM
What a steaming pile of BS.
What with that screaming guy saying we had Oswald in our office ten days ago. Who was that supposed to be? This actually looks even worse than the script I critiqued in my book.
22-08-2013, 04:39 AM
To paraphrase Clive James, there's something in what this movie says.
And that something is a tall, steaming, conical pile of horseshit. If PARKLAND is released theatrically in September, the Blu-Ray will be solicited in late October/early-November, for an end-of-year early 2014 release. The Amazon solicitation will appear at the same time. I'd strongly urge DPF members (even Jim D. if he likes) to hop on there and pen a review of the film at that point if they can. Long, well-written, negative reviews can grab the most attention and will stick on the movie's product page for years afterwards - with thousands of attendant views - if the critic gets in early. I take some solace in the notion that a majority of the public (in the US and worldwide) should smell a rat with this movie even before it opens. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)