Chris matthews afraid to face jfk assassination conspiracy

[Anthony DeFiore]

Tonight on HARDNOBALLS, Matthews calls the conspiracy theories "bunk", BUT he won't put MARK LANE, ROBERT TANNENBAUM OR CYRIL WECHT ON HIS SHOW because he fears that the TRUTH IS TOO FRIGHTENING TO HIM! HE IS A COWARD.

[Martin Harris]

Tonight on HARDNOBALLS, Matthews calls the conspiracy theories "bunk", BUT he won't put MARK LANE, ROBERT TANNENBAUM OR CYRIL WECHT ON HIS SHOW because he fears that the TRUTH IS TOO FRIGHTENING TO HIM! HE IS A COWARD.

Are you serious?

[Anthony DeFiore]

This BOOK marketing hack on jfk's back said it. Tweet or facebook this coward on his hardball website.

tonight on hardnoballs, matthews calls the conspiracy theories "bunk", but he won't put mark lane, robert tannenbaum or cyril wecht on his show because he fears that the truth is too frightening to him! He is a coward.

are you serious?

[Tracy Riddle]

Several months ago on Hardball, they were talking about something (maybe drone strikes) and Cynthia Tucker brought up the fact that the CIA had once plotted to kill Castro. She didn't even mention that they were in league with the Mafia, but Matthews tried to jump in and debunk her, saying that they weren't trying to kill him, just make his beard fall out.

If he's willing to lie about something that is documented history (via Congressional investigations), what won't he lie about? From MSNBC to CNN to Fox News, today they just literally make shit up and we are the only people left to call them out on it.

[Anthony DeFiore]

Tweet the hell out of these buffoons!

several months ago on hardball, they were talking about something (maybe drone strikes) and cynthia tucker brought up the fact that the cia had once plotted to kill castro. She didn't even mention that they were in league with the mafia, but matthews tried to jump in and debunk her, saying that they weren't trying to kill him, just make his beard fall out.

If he's willing to lie about something that is documented history (via congressional investigations), what won't he lie about? From msnbc to cnn to fox news, today they just literally make shit up and we are the only people left to call them out on it.

[Marc Ellis]

Matthews' position basically, is that since the motorcade route was changed to pass in front of Oswald's place of employment, it must have been a crime of opportunity - not a conspiracy.

His reasoning of course, necessarily assumes as a condition-precedent, that Oswald was the lone shooter. He hasn't read much on the subject, you can tell.

Ask him about 544 Camp Street, the throat wound, or JFK's missing brain, he won't want to talk about it. Because he doesn't know anything about these things.

[Albert Doyle]

He gets paid not to know it Marc.

[Tracy Riddle]

Tweet the hell out of these buffoons!

several months ago on hardball, they were talking about something (maybe drone strikes) and cynthia tucker brought up the fact that the cia had once plotted to kill castro. She didn't even mention that they were in league with the mafia, but matthews tried to jump in and debunk her, saying that they weren't trying to kill him, just make his beard fall out.

If he's willing to lie about something that is documented history (via congressional investigations), what won't he lie about? From msnbc to cnn to fox news, today they just literally make shit up and we are the only people left to call them out on it.

I'm not on Twitter, Facebook or any of that stuff. It wouldn't change his mind anyway.
Lately he thinks that Tip O'Neill and Reagan were great friends and it was really a golden age of bipartisanship in the 1980s. I guess compared to today, it was.
The problem with Matthews is that he only see the horse-race aspect of partisan politics. It's a spectator sport. The existence of a Deep State would shatter his pleasant illusions.

[Anthony DeFiore]

Tracy, Chuck Todd said today in reference to a comment by Larry Sabato saying, "I don't want to set anything off with what I say." Todd replied, "Welcome to Twitter!" And he rolled hid eyes. These bozos will be run over by Twitter, instagram, etc. to the point where they must reply. When their audience is tweeting amongst themselves, these talking heads have to know how to respond or...the ratings will go down and they'll be headed to media oblivion. "Trending now on twitter" can send them off the air or force them to respond! DELUGE THEM WITH TWEETS I SAY!

Tweet the hell out of these buffoons!

several months ago on hardball, they were talking about something (maybe drone strikes) and cynthia tucker brought up the fact that the cia had once plotted to kill castro. She didn't even mention that they were in league with the mafia, but matthews tried to jump in and debunk her, saying that they weren't trying to kill him, just make his beard fall out.

If he's willing to lie about something that is documented history (via congressional investigations), what won't he lie about? From msnbc to cnn to fox news, today they just literally make shit up and we are the only people left to call them out on it.

I'm not on Twitter, Facebook or any of that stuff. It wouldn't change his mind anyway.
Lately he thinks that Tip O'Neill and Reagan were great friends and it was really a golden age of bipartisanship in the 1980s. I guess compared to today, it was.
The problem with Matthews is that he only see the horse-race aspect of partisan politics. It's a spectator sport. The existence of a Deep State would shatter his pleasant illusions.

[Richard Coleman]

He gets paid not to know it Marc.

One of my (many) character flaws is that I have an abnormally low bullshit threshold, somewhere down around my ankles, so I wasn't able to look at Matthews JFK segment after the first few moments last night. When the shill from Time magazine said, "The Warren Commission reached the right conclusions although they used the wrong methods", that was it for me.

I suppose it's some small victory that they're so intellectually, morally and factually bankrupt that they have to acknowledge at least that the WC's "methods" were wrong.

But, whew! ::vomit::