Best critical books, videos, articles on 9/11

[Drew Phipps]

So a sort of Zionist apartheid? I am going to have to get that book.

[Magda Hassan]

So a sort of Zionist apartheid? I am going to have to get that book.

Yes. Definitely. There has always been a strong thread of classism/racism in Israel. It is a very stratified society and the real players don't live there of course.

Do read Max Blumenthal's book. Well worth the time. http://www.amazon.com/Goliath-Life-Loath...1568586345 But do buy from your local independent book shop if you can. Amazon link for reference only.

[Magda Hassan]

[Peter Lemkin]

Bumped for the 13th!

[Peter Lemkin]

The End of the Road for NIST

By Tony Szamboti
Editor's Note: In recent years, various members of the AE911Truth team have been working on a white paper titled "Areas of Specific Concern in the NIST WTC Reports." Last month they finally completed the document. Its 25 concise points offer the most convincing proof that the reports produced by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) on the September 11, 2001, destruction of the three World Trade Center buildings were unscientific and fraudulent. The authors of "The 25 Points" designed the document to provide material that would compel the convening of a grand jury. Whether or not a grand jury is ever impaneled in any jurisdiction, though, readers of this white paper have the duty and privilege of acting as a virtual grand jury in all jurisdictions. After weighing the evidence meticulously laid out in "The 25 Points," readers can, by their resulting actions, help determine whether there will one day be a new, fully funded, truly independent, wholly transparent, and unimpeachably honest investigation of 9/11.

---

Areas of Specific Concern in the NIST WTC Reports


Below is a series of twenty-five provable points which clearly demonstrate that the reports produced by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) on the destruction of the World Trade Center (WTC) were unscientific and fraudulent. Therefore NIST itself including its lead authors, Shyam Sunder and John Gross - should be investigated.

---

Table of Contents

[TABLE]
[TR]
[TD]WTC 7 THE THIRD SKYSCRAPER

[/TD]
[TD] 2[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]1. OMISSION OF GIRDER STIFFENERS SHOWN ON FRANKEL DRAWING #9114[/TD]
[TD] 2[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]2. OMISSION OF THREE LATERAL SUPPORT BEAMS ON THE 13TH FLOOR G3005 BEAM[/TD]
[TD] 2[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]3. WTC 7 COLLAPSE AT FREE-FALL ACCELERATION IS NOT EXPLAINED[/TD]
[TD] 3[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]4. VIDEOS OF THE COLLAPSE OF WTC 7 BETRAY NIST'S COMPUTER MODEL[/TD]
[TD] 3[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]5. CLAIMS OF INVESTIGATING CONTROLLED DEMOLITION WITHOUT TESTING FOR EXPLOSIVE RESIDUES[/TD]
[TD] 4[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]6. CHANGES OF STATEMENTS ON COMPOSITE BEAMS AND SHEAR STUD USE BETWEEN DRAFTS[/TD]
[TD] 5[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]7. REFUSING OF FOIA REQUESTS[/TD]
[TD] 6[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]ALL THREE BUILDINGS[/TD]
[TD] 6[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]8. NEGLIGENCE IN SALVAGING STEEL[/TD]
[TD] 6[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]9. IGNORING THE RESULTS OF FEMA 403, APPENDIX C[/TD]
[TD] 6[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]10. INVOLVEMENT IN NOT SAVING STEEL FOR INVESTIGATION[/TD]
[TD] 7[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]11. FIRE SIMULATIONS AND DURATIONS ARE EXAGGERATED[/TD]
[TD] 8[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]12. NO DISCUSSION OF THE MOLTEN METAL FOUND IN THE RUBBLE OF THE THREE COLLAPSED BUILDINGS.[/TD]
[TD] 8[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]13. REFUSAL TO TEST FOR EXPLOSIVE RESIDUE[/TD]
[TD] 9[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]14. FAILURE TO FOLLOW STANDARD FIRE INVESTIGATION PROTOCOL[/TD]
[TD] 10[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]THE TWIN TOWERS

[/TD]
[TD] 10[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]15. STRIPPING OF THE FIRE PROOFING IS EXAGGERATED[/TD]
[TD] 10[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]16. PRE-COLLAPSE STEEL TEMPERATURES ARE EXAGGERATED[/TD]
[TD] 11[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]17. TESTED FLOOR ASSEMBLIES DID NOT FAIL[/TD]
[TD] 11[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]18. INITIATION OF COLLAPSE "INWARD BOWING" WAS INDUCED ARTIFICIALLY[/TD]
[TD] 12[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]19. COLUMN STRESS DUE TO LOAD REDISTRIBUTION IS NOT SUFFICIENT TO CAUSE FAILURE[/TD]
[TD] 12[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]20. NO EXPLANATION GIVEN FOR HORIZONTAL PROPAGATION OF COLLAPSE[/TD]
[TD] 12[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]21. WTC 1 TILT OCCURRED AFTER SYMMETRICAL COLLAPSE FOR AT LEAST TWO STORIES[/TD]
[TD] 13[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]22. NO JOLT CONTINUOUS ACCELERATION OF COLLAPSE WAS IGNORED[/TD]
[TD] 14[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]23. NO PILE DRIVER IS OBSERVED IN VIDEOS[/TD]
[TD] 16[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]24. COLUMN LOADS WERE CALCULATED FOR WORST CASE, NOT ACTUAL IN-SERVICE LOADS[/TD]
[TD] 17[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]25. MOLTEN METAL OBSERVED POURING OUT OF THE CORNER OF WTC 2 REMAINS UNRESOLVED[/TD]
[TD] 17[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

---

WTC 7 THE THIRD SKYSCRAPER

1. OMISSION OF GIRDER STIFFENERS SHOWN ON FRANKEL DRAWING #9114

Technical Statement: NIST maintains that WTC 7 collapsed due to fire acting upon the 13th floor A2001 girder between columns 79 and 44 and the beams framing into it from the east. They said that the beams expanded by 5.5" (revised in June 2012 to 6.25"), broke the girder erection bolts, and pushed this girder off its column 79 seat. This girder fell to floor 12, which then precipitated a cascade of floor failures from floor 12 down to floor 5, and column 79 then became unsupported laterally, causing it to buckle. It is then said that column 79's buckling caused the upper floors to cascade down, which started a
Read more...

[Tracy Riddle]

Has anyone read Wayne Madsen's book "The Star and the Sword"? Sounds interesting: This book, for the first time, suggests that both Israel and Saudi Arabia were intimately involved in planning and carrying out the 9/11 attack on the United States. Both countries, while seemingly enemies, have been longtime secret allies. They share a number of common enemies, including Iran, Shi'a Islam, pan-Arab nationalism, Hezbollah, and the Muslim Brotherhood. Their intelligence chiefs often meet and conspire in utmost secrecy. The Saudis and Israelis had the motive and the means to cooperate in launching a "false flag" terrorist attack on the United States in order to plunge America into endless conflicts to bolster the positions of Israel and Saudi Arabia. This book tells that story.

[Peter Lemkin]

Just wanted to add:

• The 2001 Anthrax Deception: The Case for a Domestic Conspiracy by Graeme MacQueen
  
• The Big Wedding by Sander Hicks [while I don't agree with all he believes, he has some rather amazing documentation, not widely known, of persons with foreknowledge of the events -and official cover-up and silencing of them and what they knew].
  
• Hijacking America's Mind on 9/11 by Davidsson
  

[Anthony Thorne]

Just wanted to add:

• The 2001 Anthrax Deception: The Case for a Domestic Conspiracy by Graeme MacQueen
  
• The Big Wedding by Sander Hicks [while I don't agree with all he believes, he has some rather amazing documentation, not widely known, of persons with foreknowledge of the events -and official cover-up and silencing of them and what they knew].
  
• Hijacking America's Mind on 9/11 by Davidsson
  

All three of those are good books. The MacQueen volume is very persuasive. Davidsson's book is equally a formidable piece of research and deserves to be more widely read.

Funnily enough, Hicks has backtracked on some of the assertions he made in THE BIG WEDDING. On the DVD release of Elinoff's CORE OF CORRUPTION, Hicks spoke in a supplemental interview, mentioned how his views had changed a little after reading Tarpley's book on the attacks, and he gave a very telling account of some phone calls he'd made afterwards to various figures he pegged as being involved in the cover-up, with some fairly pregnant comments being made on both sides. (Hicks is now more open to the notion of 'what hit the Pentagon' being ambiguous).

More pointedly, Hicks followed up his BIG WEDDING volume with a later book entitled SLINGSHOT TO THE JUGGERNAUT, which is three-quarters 9/11 truth, one quarter (the climax) reflections on his personal religious philosophies and non-violence. In that book, he describes being given information about the Muslim Brotherhood for his first book by a women who he later learned worked for the CIA, and who (he now suspects) was leading him away from considering the CIA's active role in 9/11. The book is linked below (on special for just a couple of bucks as I type) and the contents listed under the 'look inside the book' feature are instructive. It has quite a bit of solid 9/11 info and discussion.

http://www.amazon.com/Slingshot-Juggerna...NDER+HICKS

[Tracy Riddle]

A good documentary I just watched. Especially the personal story of this guy's recent awakening (2011) from the official story:

[Dawn Meredith]

Wow, one could spend a week on this thread alone. This forum rocks!

But I am very worried about Peter....anyone hear from him of late???

A friend was interested in this subject so I just linked this to my facebook page for her.

Drew it's someone you know too

Dawn