Posts: 3,936
Threads: 474
Likes Received: 1 in 1 posts
Likes Given: 1
Joined: Dec 2009
A thought experiment: Did MR lose his way? Or did he find it? Could madness be a logical conclusion and an act of courage?
I don't have a good answer, and those here who can snap off a quick rebuttal should probably think first.
Quote:And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you. -- Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche
"We'll know our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the American public believes is false." --William J. Casey, D.C.I
"We will lead every revolution against us." --Theodore Herzl
Posts: 5,374
Threads: 149
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2010
Ivan De Mey Wrote:I think the Verge story goes way beyond that. It suggests that:
- Mike Ruppert was a mental case
- Mike Ruppert was an alcoholic
- his sexual harrasment conviction was correct (Ruppert claimed he was the victim)
- the Teddy d'Orsay drug-trafficking story was a figment of his imagination
As a former subscriber to From The Wilderness I find it all very disturbing. Not to mention the comment section of the article, where you have John McAdams-acolytes dancing on Ruppert's grave.
The comments section has vicious posters attacking Ruppert as a paranoid conspiracy theorist. Some of them might be agents.
There's obviously something wrong with the piece. It accents the negatives of Ruppert's flaws. Just what operatives following the CIA memo would do.
I believe intel has sick methods to make someone kill themselves. If Ruppert did it on his own then he's guilty of being the guy who shot Michael Ruppert.
It's tough being a truth teller because truth tellers live outside of the social support and approval of the status quo. Human beings are tuned to that social support and approval so living on the outside can wear on you. The murderers thrive on that psychological dynamic and use it to back their crimes. They also use it to murder the truth tellers with sick psychological warfare.
Posts: 49
Threads: 4
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Mar 2014
"Evil is arrogant. It has no conscience. It is utterly self-serving. It hides from the light and will attack, even destroy others to preserve its own demented delusions. It is an unrestrained sociopath, wallowing in the murky darkness of its own psychosis while endlessly rationalizing its terrible deeds. It infiltrates the weak-minded and subverts the weak of character."
Paraphrased from something I think I found on FTW a long time ago. It's been part of the homepage of every browser on every smartphone, tablet, laptop, and pc I've owned for the lastt 11 years along with the Hollerith poster.
Those who must silence others for speaking the truth cannot be innocent.
Posts: 53
Threads: 14
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2013
Wesley T. Miller from Collapsenet wrote a response to the Verge-story, trying to explain why it came out so negative. The story originally was much longer, and got badly edited. Miller doesn't blame the author, it seems.
https://www.collapsenet.com/free-resourc...y-t-miller
This is just the first part of Millers response. A second part is in the works.
Posts: 5,374
Threads: 149
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2010
It's silly to even mention bipolar or alcoholic. All it does is give reminders that help the enemy.
