Intersting that the FBI selected a 2 second time interval between shot 2 and 3. What was the minimum time to load and fire again, according to Frazier? Wasn't that 2.3 seconds? .3 secs would add 5-6 feet to the distance.
I also wonder if 307 feet would get us to the Daltex Bldg. Its 307 - 265 = 42 extra feet
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
Drew Phipps Wrote:Intersting that the FBI selected a 2 second time interval between shot 2 and 3. What was the minimum time to load and fire again, according to Frazier? Wasn't that 2.3 seconds? .3 secs would add 5-6 feet to the distance.
Drew,
Use a limo traveling at 3.74 mph circa extant 313 for your calculations.
Itek does their study and determines the limo in Nix is moving at 7.6mph per every fourth frame (set of 4 frames), for a total of 12 frames prior to extant 313.
If, at some point, I extract every other frame at 3.74 mph, the limo now appears to travel at 7.48 mph. See previous posting.
I would like to see evidence - witness recounting- of such an occurrence. Tons of reports of gun shots heard or what some called back firing sounds but I have never seen a single report of anyone hearing an explosion or a flash.
Dawn Meredith Wrote:I would like to see evidence - witness recounting- of such an occurrence. Tons of reports of gun shots heard or what some called back firing sounds but I have never seen a single report of anyone hearing an explosion or a flash.
Most curious.
Dawn
He posted the paper over at Burnham's forum.
IMO it's largely a semantic argument. The timing is still the "firecracker" report any way you look at it, and referred to as such in the paper.
Dawn Meredith Wrote:I would like to see evidence - witness recounting- of such an occurrence. Tons of reports of gun shots heard or what some called back firing sounds but I have never seen a single report of anyone hearing an explosion or a flash.
Most curious.
Dawn
He posted the paper over at Burnham's forum.
IMO it's largely a semantic argument. The timing is still the "firecracker" report any way you look at it, and referred to as such in the paper.
I agree semantics. A firecracker or firecrackers, a cannon salute, a back fire, a bomb, or a muzzle blast, can all be termed explosions but none sound similar. Most described a firecracker/firecrackers, or a back fire. Vey different from a terrifying roar, a cannon, or a big bomb.
![[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=6255&stc=1]](https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=6255&stc=1)
![[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=6256&stc=1]](https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=6256&stc=1)
