Jimi Hendrix Murder - 40 years ago - The 'Experience'!

[Charles Keeble]

I first encountered this thread whenever it was that I briefly encountered DPF and read some stuff here, which must have been early 2011. I read just a few comments and bailed.

When it popped up again, I read the whole thing, and it really put my stomach in turmoil and left me pacing about the house for close to three days (28th-30th). I knew intuitively that there was more going on than just a tragic accident gone awry, but was entirely unaware of the venality and brutality involved.

Albert, I agree with everything you've said here, especially comment #43.

I'm not at all sure why reading this has affected me so intensely, but I'll try to explain.

My first encounter with JH's music would have been hearing stuff like Fire, Foxey Lady, and so forth played on the radio when I was about 4-7.

Next would have been at around age 9, when I snuck into my older sister's room and put her copy of Electric Ladyland on our parents "Horrend-O-Phonic" record player. I got through maybe 15 seconds of "And the Gods Made Love", and took it off thinking "What the hell is this?" (Yes, I distinctly remember this, and the same thing happened with GD's "Live Dead" that day)

The first day of my freshman year in high school, I walked into my "Fantasy and Science Fiction" elective class, and sat down behind a senior, who knowing absolutely nothing about me, turned around, gave me one the most penetrating looks I've ever encountered, and said "You need to listen to 'Axis: Bold As Love'" Huh? Within a few weeks, I bought a copy with money from doing chores (mow the lawn $2), and the whole thing just wiped me out. Went back and listened to Electric Ladyland, and hmmm... something in ME has changed drastically, because now I can't get enough of it. I suppose what had changed is I'd been learning to play two instruments for a few years right then. Clarinet, which I stopped playing by the end of the year, and Bb fife, which I've been playing off and on for nearly 42 years now. A few years later when I was first learning guitar (haven't played in 17 years), I put a pickup on a 1931 National Duolian, put it in open-E tuning, laid a Barcus Berry amp on it's back, put the National on top, and putzed around with the idea of playing a slide + feedback rendition of the Woodstock version of "Star Spangled Banner". It sorta worked.

"Voodoo Chile" (side 1) and side 3 of Electric Ladyland became my favorites and got played endlessly until I got a copy of "The Cry of Love" my senior year, which became and has remained my favorite ever since. _SO_ glad that's recently re-released on CD since I stupidly sold my LP around 93 and discovered I couldn't find it on CD. Second favorite "Rainbow Bridge" also _finally_ on CD. Got both on the 16th. I've been furiously listening to all sorts of JH since early September in anticipation, and listening to a lesser extent since the PBS special last November.

I ended up collecting everything I could find. As far as I can tell, the only two LPs I've never owned are "Crash Landing" and at "At His Best Vol. 4", which I never found. Have loads of bootlegs and so on.

Some of his lyrics really spooked the hell out of some of the spookier spooks out there.

That's enough. I'm pacing again. What a sick stinky world of damn near exclusively deception we have. GRRRRRRRRRRRR

Not so much the "Third Stone From The Sun" as it is the fourth dingleberry from Uranus.

Up From The Skies

[Albert Doyle]

That's what kills me, if the brain power aimed at the Kennedy assassination were focused on the Hendrix assassination it would have been solved decades ago because it is actually a much simpler case with much more pregnant evidence. Jimi suffers from being the victim of his own greatness. He's giant enough that he's dangerous but the tendency to deny black people justice also extends to him so he suffers the worst of both worlds. Because of this the authorities have gotten away with angling the mirrors just right to cover up a political assassination.

Next month this thing is going to have a shocking revelation that will show undoubtable proof that Jimi was killed by covert operation (as if it wasn't obvious enough already).

[Albert Doyle]

CNN's John Blake has put out an allegedly favorable article on Jimi Hendrix's blackness and how the African American community is finally coming around to recognizing Jimi's status as a black person. On the surface you might think CNN is doing a nice favorable article about Hendrix trying to advance his reputation. However persons with deeper political knowledge will see what CNN is actually doing. Remember, CNN is the organization that put out the pro-Warren Report coverage on the 50th anniversary of Kennedy's assassination.

CNN uses Hendrix author Charles Cross, who wrote the book Room Full Of Mirrors, as a base for the article. What the public is dangerously ignorant of is that Charles Cross went out of his way to make it look like inbred psychological flaws from Jimi's dysfunctional family and childhood led directly to his reckless use of drugs that eventually caused his death. When viewed through a deep political filter it becomes clear that the cursory biography Cross produced in 2005 was a disinformation work whose sole purpose was to counter the emerging controversy over his death. I'm a Hendrix expert, so, trust me, Cross is doing this. The murder controversy had been out for at least 12 years before Cross released his book yet he never mentions a single word about it in Room Full Of Mirrors. Cross wrote the book at the height of Bush's War On Terror campaigns in the Middle East. The anti-war counterculture figure Hendrix was on FBI's Security Index when he was alive. Cross researched obscure Army psychological records saying Jimi claimed he was gay. CNN bannered this claim and Cross' book for the months following. Smart people will ask why Seattle Intelligencer reporter Cross could manage to find private obscure army records but not manage to find the serious controversy over Jimi's death that had been out in public for over a decade?

I'm a Hendrix expert so I can see what Cross is doing. Unfortunately, most of the public can't. If you read Room Full Of Mirrors you'll see Cross went out of his way to interview people who he thought could verify Jimi nearly choking in his sleep while on drugs. Smart people will realize Cross must have gone out and asked Hendrix friends "Did you ever see Jimi choking in his sleep while on drugs?" He finally got some Hendrix friends to admit they had to assist Jimi during a night time case of drug exacerbated apnea. Having gotten what he was looking for Cross then came to the conclusion that the night Jimi died he had a similar case of drug-induced apnea that killed him. Cross failed to mention that on the night he died a doctor witnessed Jimi's lungs and stomach drowned in an usually large amount of wine. Something that didn't occur during those other apnea events.

If you read Room Full Of Mirrors you'll see Cross covered Jimi's death in all of one page, coming to the conclusion that psychological flaws implanted in Jimi from his youth led directly to the drug recklessness that killed him that night. You have be a top Hendrix expert to see the self-revealing move Cross makes next. In his faulty summation Cross adds that he surmises Monika Dannemann took one of the super-powerful pills at 4am and slept through the whole choking on vomit death scene. Cross says that he has sleuthed this conclusion out from the evidence, suggesting that Monika did not want to admit she failed to help Jimi. I've done enough research on this that I can say with authority that not only was this medically impossible but Cross was using it as a disinformation device by which to avoid analyzing what actually did occur during his suggested sleeping period for Dannemann. Yes, that is what I am saying, is that Cross uses this impossible suggestion deliberately in order to get around having to tell the truth he is aware of. He's lying to his readers and his mission is to misinform the public on how Jimi died.

You have to realize Cross is a reporter for a major newspaper. From his professional background there is absolutely no excuse for his not doing the hour's worth of reading it would have taken to discover that Monika not only could not have taken the sleeping pill he suggests but that she could not have been asleep during that critical 2 hour period from 4am to 6am. The recent Hendrix movie All Is By My Side was sued by Hendrix girlfriend Kathy Etchingham becuase it showed scenes of drug abuse and violence that Etchingham said never happened. The film maker admitted the scenes came from Cross' book. When approached Cross apologized saying he had not thoroughly researched enough. Cross was caught trying to accent typical defamation character flaws. Other Hendrix experts have commented that they couldn't figure out the purpose of Cross' book. That it emphasized Jimi's childhood but ignored his fame years. The reason for that is because Cross needed to contrive childhood psychological flaws in his disinformation build-up to Jimi's death. The reason he omitted the fame years is because those years were the years involving Jimi's manager Michael Jeffery and the motives for Jeffery's murder of Jimi. Those other experts sense there's something wrong with Cross. What they don't realize is the diabolical reason behind Cross' effort. When you view Room Full Of Mirrors through the deep politics filter of a Gerald Posner CIA writer trying to do damage control for the emerging evidence for Jimi's murder it all snaps in to place.

It's really crazy because most Hendrix fans come from a background where they aren't familiar with deep politics and covert intrigue. Cross is praised by these people because they like any kind of Hendrix work. Cross is not subjected to any kind of informational peer pressure. No one asks why he omitted the controversy over Jimi's murder? If you look at some of the Facebook pages of Jimi's main friends and even family members Cross is a snug member in their "friends" window. A real Judas having penetrated deep in.

John Blake's CNN article allegedly doing tribute to Hendrix has Cross as a main spokesperson, just like the CNN productions on Kennedy have notorious government apologists as their main spokespeople. Cross is being normalized and subtly legitimatized with the public. Towards the end Blake mentions in two sentences that Jimi took a drug overdose and choked on his own vomit.

The CNN article is just fake chocolate cake designed to throw sweet, covertly-masked poison to the great unwashed of the Hendrix community in order to place layers of inert filler between Jimi and the evidence for his murder.

There is no comments section in the CNN article:


http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/18/showbiz/ji...le-legacy/

[Peter Lemkin]

Read Alex Constantine's The Covert War Against Rock......it wasn't just Hendrix.....it was many, many musicians that the 'Borg' felt challenged their control of society - or that their deaths could be used to control it. John Lennon was clearly another...but the list is long...... Mae Brussell was probably the first to note this and speak about it publicly.

[Albert Doyle]

Constantine was one of the first sources that influenced me when I first found out about this in 2009. However if you read my last post I believe Charles Cross is an un-outed live CIA disinformation op. He's an active Gerald Posner aimed at Hendrix by CIA whom the Hendrix community is not educated enough in deep politics to detect. It was the education I received from this site and others that allowed me to detect the sure signs of an intel writer seeking to divert the public away from evidence of covert murder. DiEugenio's deft detection of intel writers and media spooks helped me detect what Cross is doing. If the evidence for Jimi's murder wasn't enough on its own this evidence of a government disinformation campaign over his death using covert writers most certainly is.

[Albert Doyle]

While Jimi's brother Leon is touring Australia the Telegraph decided to celebrate his visit by issuing this filthy disinformation piece suggesting Jimi was a depressed member of the 27 Club vulnerable to suicide. It's a real insult being added to injury since the doctor who witnessed Jimi being drowned in wine, and therefore murdered, is a citizen of Sydney, the same home town as the quack Australian psychologist, Dianna Kenny, who authored the work. The article mentions not one word about the murder evidence that contradicts the content matter:



http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnew...erson.html



Call me paranoid, but I check for Hendrix articles every day and this Guardian article did not appear in my Google search until after the comments were closed. Guardian reporter Ed Vulliamy lived on the London street Jimi was murdered on at the time. Because of that he is the Guardian reporter who regularly reports on Hendrix. In this fecal splattering of Hendrix, via an article on the new Hendrix film, Vulliamy adds at the end:

Back home, I changed into all white and waited for cover of darkness to go round to 22 Lansdowne Crescent, where Hendrix had died in the basement, swallowing vomit after a night out with wine, amphetamines and a German girl called Monika.

Vulliamy can get away with saying Jimi had "a night out with wine" because Jimi did partake in some wine at Phillip Harvey's townhouse in Marylebone, London, but that was between 7 and 10pm - many hours before. The 5mg blood alcohol content recorded at Jimi's autopsy falls right in line with Jimi digesting the wine he drank at Harvey's down to the 5mg found at autopsy. Famous London Corner's Office pathologist Dr Rufus Crompton examined Jimi's autopsy sheets for Scotland Yard in 1993, coming to the conclusion that Jimi died around 5:30am. The 5mg blood alcohol content found at autopsy is right in line with Jimi digesting the wine he drank 7 hours earlier down to the 5mg found at his autopsy. According to forensic science this proves that the wine Jimi drank that night had nothing to do with his death even though the media insists on suggesting it did.

Vulliamy commits media fraud by not sharing these details with his readers. To this day Scotland Yard has never given credible notice to this condemning evidence.

Here's Vulliamy's false praise article that compliments Jimi for changing the sound of music at a world level but then turns around and sells him to the devil on his murder:





http://www.theguardian.com/music/2014/oc...d-for-ever



.

[Albert Doyle]

Wikipedia banned me because I wrote on the "Talk" page hidden behind the article that there was actually good evidence Michael Jeffery murdered Jimi Hendrix contrary to what the article writers were saying. An uber moderator swooped in and accused me of violating the Wikipedia Defamation Of Living Persons Policy and said I would be banned. I protested in an appeal that I was banned unfairly since Michael Jeffery had been dead since 1973. Also I was the leading Talk Page member who guided the page towards its final present content and helped change the previously inaccurate content. This is the response I got from the Wikipedia moderator:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that either the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or that the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you have been blocked for, will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and will make useful contributions instead.

Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information.

King of Hearts
English Wikipedia Administrator

[Magda Hassan]

Wikipedia banned me because I wrote on the "Talk" page hidden behind the article that there was actually good evidence Michael Jeffery murdered Jimi Hendrix contrary to what the article writers were saying. An uber moderator swooped in and accused me of violating the Wikipedia Defamation Of Living Persons Policy and said I would be banned. I protested in an appeal that I was banned unfairly since Michael Jeffery had been dead since 1973.

::face.palm:: Looks like Wiki just can't admit they are wrong...Or maybe just want to reinvent the Truth.

[David Guyatt]

More like they appoint moderators who have a suitable agenda and won't permit anything except the official explanation. In other words the usual story these days.

[Albert Doyle]

I think it is actionable and they should be sued for it. They offer a plea for public input and then practice methods that would be considered violations of public conduct in any other case.

The failed ex-porno film-maker Jimmy Wales then asks for donations on top of it!


Here's an excerpt from the Michael Jeffery "Talk" page:

WP:UNDUE[edit]

It'd be a shame if the unproven and unprovable murder allegation overwhelmed this article. I recognise that BLP is not a factor here but WP:NPOV definitely is. --John (talk) 22:51, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
I came across this article yesterday having GA reviewed Canadian drug charges and trial of Jimi Hendrix and remarked that while getting articles to GA and FA is great, sometimes it might be preferable to have a better average quality of articles on a topic, and cited this and Chas Chandler as examples. I'm sure the regular Hendrix editors can whip this into shape - I personally don't have any decent sources to hand. Ritchie333 [SUP](talk)[/SUP] [SUP](cont)[/SUP] 09:44, 21 February 2014 (UTC)Jeffrey was an elusive figure that the reliable Hendrix sources don't say much about. Its my understanding that there are only a few pictures of him and that most of his life is shrouded in mystery if not myth. Based on the little that I do know about him, I seriously doubt that this article could be expanded to GA level, but the nonsense about his having murdered Hendrix is at best a matter for WP:FRINGE. GabeMc [SUP](talk|contribs)[/SUP] 19:38, 15 March 2014 (UTC)I wasn't thinking of even going that far - just C class would do for now. Ritchie333 [SUP](talk)[/SUP] [SUP](cont)[/SUP] 07:42, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

The first editor calls the murder claim unprovable. Not true. This kind of one-line doubt is all Wikipedia needs to establish the anti-murder bias and norm.

GabeMc is a regular. He calls the murder evidence "nonsense" and once again establishes the phony rules-skewed censorship of information that supports that oppressive view. I'm sure if you investigated GabeMc he would be of the same type as the Cuban posting in favor of McAdams.


Of course it would be a shame if a man who single-handedly represents a symbol of government murder and cover-up was known for his single-most important act. Gee, the next thing you know is people will be ganging-up on Judas and defaming him.



.