21-06-2015, 12:07 PM
Vanessa Loney Wrote:David Guyatt Wrote:I found this post on ROKC:
Quote:Vanessa at April 12, 2015 at 4:31 AM
Hi Lee and Hasan
I"m a member at the Deep Politics Forum and am happy to post whatever you want about Albert Doyle. I can't seem to do anything but type on this computer though due to the browser so if you have something for me to post it will have to be sent to my private email Vanessa.Loney@transact.net.au.
Having said that, I don't think anyone is going to believe for one second I am the one making the case about Albert Doyle. I don't mind being booted of there though as I've never posted.
The answer is no. You do not bring that here. If the members there want to discuss that subject there with Albert then do so. But keep it there. You do not hound members here.
Also, you do not post here the views and opinions of other ROKC members -- as their pen for hire. That is a banning issue.
Having read your posts here my analysis is that almost everything you have posted is actually on behalf of others at ROKC who appear to have an agenda here -- but can't or don't wish to be present it themselves.
I can't tell you how reprehensible I find that attitude.
I can tell you I am recommending you for banishment.
David
You'll note that comment was a couple of months ago and I did offer to post some research others had done because they were banned from DP.
I saw that as a free speech issue and offered to post it for them.
Obviously I was not expecting anyone to believe it was my research and was expecting to be banned as a result. I'm a free speech extremist and cannot abide people being locked out of forums for expressing objectionable views.
I never did post that information. The comments I've made on here are based on reading that research and coming to my own conclusions.
Obviously it's up to you if you ban me, c'est la vie.
It's not a free speech issue. It doesn't even come close.
Offering to post on behalf of members who have been specifically banned from this forum is completely out of order.
And having read your posts here I conclude you have a very specific DPF agenda focused on certain members - rather than an underlying subject based interest - and therefore find your explanation hard to believe.
Hounding members is not acceptable practise.
As always on DPF, the founders vote on important decisions. My vote has already been cast.
Il n'y a pas de fumee sans feu.
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
Carl Jung - Aion (1951). CW 9, Part II: P.14