21-06-2015, 03:14 PM
Vanessa Loney Wrote:David Guyatt Wrote:Vanessa Loney Wrote:David Guyatt Wrote:It's not a free speech issue. It doesn't even come close.
Offering to post on behalf of members who have been specifically banned from this forum is completely out of order.
And having read your posts here I conclude you have a very specific DPF agenda focused on certain members - rather than an underlying subject based interest - and therefore find your explanation hard to believe.
Hounding members is not acceptable practise.
As always on DPF, the founders vote on important decisions. My vote has already been cast.
Il n'y a pas de fumee sans feu.
David
Well, that is certainly one vote that I don't expect to win. So I thank you for your time but as this is my last post here I'll say this.
Perhaps DP should reconsider allowing entire threads that attack other forums and individuals and then don't allow them the opportunity to respond without characterising them as trolls etc because it really doesn't speak well for your attitude towards fair debate and free speech.
If anyone wants to come on to EF to discuss any of these issues with me then I would welcome that and you won't be personally attacked I assure you.
But what I actually expect you all to do is ban me and then stick the boots in.
As for my supposed agenda, I have stated a number of times what I came on here for - a debate between JA and GP and to defend the attacks made on EF, ROKC and myself.
Selamat tinggal dan terima kasih.
I notice that you ignored the fact in your above justification that amongst your motives here was also to persistently hound Albert Doyle.
Anyway, I, for one, won't stick the boot in. Life's too short for such nonsense.
Goodbye.
David - if Mr Doyle had addressed the issue when it was first raised (or even addressed it at all) I wouldn't have repeated my question. And I would have thought that having a member on here under a false name was against DP rules.
There is no requirement for members to respond to a post. Unlike you, Albert's a long and established member here. Cease and desist this campaign. This is positively the last warning I'll give you.
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
Carl Jung - Aion (1951). CW 9, Part II: P.14