28-06-2015, 05:44 AM
(This post was last modified: 28-06-2015, 06:18 AM by Peter Lemkin.)
The list of tampered with [or created out of 'whole cloth after the fact'] evidence is long and horrifying/damning. Ditto the tampering with [or creation of false] images - still and moving - along with witness 'statements'. To me this is fact. One can debate, perhaps, if this or that particular one fits in the category, but as there were persons and agencies/groupings deliberately [on their own/or on 'orders'] tampering with the evidence [by making it disappear when it was there; or appear when it was not], that opens up the door to all kinds of possibilities - and will inevitably make some evidence that should coincide with other evidence seem to contract one another. I think the tampering had two motives. 1] to hide the conspiracy and its details/trail, and 2] to make the evidence look/be too unreliable to make prima facia conclusions [and thus to try to perpetrate the hoax that the People should just 'trust' the [often complicit] authorities - who 'know better'.
From the start of the plot to today, the JFK Assassination was a 'magic show' - with disappearing items and conjured other ones. 'Facts' and evidence in the case are often relative, IMHO, little, sadly, is solid indisputable fact [although a hell of a lot of other parts of it can be discerned/decided with long and careful analysis]. Facts that are indisputable include that 'Oswald was not the assassin and not 'lone''; that he was the patsy for a much larger and high[est] level conspiracy; that 'what you saw' with the shooting and body was not 'what you got' [the evidence, such as it is, is largely false or tampered with]. As fake as the event was, our polity since then, and because of the event, and its governmental-level cover-up [which continues] is even more fake and illegitimate. Nothing comes easy in this case - and the tampered with evidence and witnesses are a large part of the reason. It was a coup and a secret one, at that. There is nothing they would/will not do to keep that fact hidden or confusing from the average citizen. There is a [changing over time with new information] hierarchy of evidence validity. I'd not off hand exclude the more than one shot to the back or in the back - and wouldn't let the apparent one hole in the clothes stop me in that regard. I've done amateur magic, and my uncle was a professional magician. One can do a lot to fool the 'viewer' to see / witness something other than what really happened. When the majority of police, authorities, investigators, media, and forensic teams were in league with [or manipulated by] the 'magicians' and their masters, evidential 'reality' is relative, and very much distorted. All that said, we have slowly made progress, IMHO, with the consensual view among the more reasonable, and open-minded, researchers/students of this most important and pivotal event. It set the stage for a host of other 'magic shows - such as: RFK, MLK, 9-11-01'...the list is sad and VERY, VERY long. Trusting the 'authorities' and 'official facts' IMO is a fool's game and fool's gain.
From the start of the plot to today, the JFK Assassination was a 'magic show' - with disappearing items and conjured other ones. 'Facts' and evidence in the case are often relative, IMHO, little, sadly, is solid indisputable fact [although a hell of a lot of other parts of it can be discerned/decided with long and careful analysis]. Facts that are indisputable include that 'Oswald was not the assassin and not 'lone''; that he was the patsy for a much larger and high[est] level conspiracy; that 'what you saw' with the shooting and body was not 'what you got' [the evidence, such as it is, is largely false or tampered with]. As fake as the event was, our polity since then, and because of the event, and its governmental-level cover-up [which continues] is even more fake and illegitimate. Nothing comes easy in this case - and the tampered with evidence and witnesses are a large part of the reason. It was a coup and a secret one, at that. There is nothing they would/will not do to keep that fact hidden or confusing from the average citizen. There is a [changing over time with new information] hierarchy of evidence validity. I'd not off hand exclude the more than one shot to the back or in the back - and wouldn't let the apparent one hole in the clothes stop me in that regard. I've done amateur magic, and my uncle was a professional magician. One can do a lot to fool the 'viewer' to see / witness something other than what really happened. When the majority of police, authorities, investigators, media, and forensic teams were in league with [or manipulated by] the 'magicians' and their masters, evidential 'reality' is relative, and very much distorted. All that said, we have slowly made progress, IMHO, with the consensual view among the more reasonable, and open-minded, researchers/students of this most important and pivotal event. It set the stage for a host of other 'magic shows - such as: RFK, MLK, 9-11-01'...the list is sad and VERY, VERY long. Trusting the 'authorities' and 'official facts' IMO is a fool's game and fool's gain.
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass