07-07-2015, 07:36 PM
But see Albert, that is what is odd about Vince.
In some cases, like the RFK case, and the 2000 election heist, the Paula Jones case, and the phony pretenses for the Iraq War, Vince was pretty good. In fact, when I first read his front page article in The Nation, about the Supreme Court decision in Bush vs Gore, I got his number from a friend and congratulated him on a job well done. He also subscribed to Probe, and I talked to him a few times when he would order stuff. We agreed on how bad Ken Starr was, and then he sent me his Paula Jones book. Which I thought was quite good.
So Vince's overall output is a mixed bag I think. And his batting average is over .500.
In some cases, like the RFK case, and the 2000 election heist, the Paula Jones case, and the phony pretenses for the Iraq War, Vince was pretty good. In fact, when I first read his front page article in The Nation, about the Supreme Court decision in Bush vs Gore, I got his number from a friend and congratulated him on a job well done. He also subscribed to Probe, and I talked to him a few times when he would order stuff. We agreed on how bad Ken Starr was, and then he sent me his Paula Jones book. Which I thought was quite good.
So Vince's overall output is a mixed bag I think. And his batting average is over .500.