Anyone want to discuss HARVEY & LEE?

[Albert Doyle]

What some of the deniers foolishly don't understand is that the item in question is a small paper card license designed to be held in a wallet. A certain crude H&L denier is trying to present the smudged driver's license application as being the card found at the Texas Highway and Safety Department. Only someone who doesn't know what they are talking about would dare propose that the large legal letter-sized application is what the clerk was referring to when she said 6 employees saw the small driver's license with Oswald's name on it. The claim that this card was the application only shows the investigatory incompetence of the claimer. This crude hack is trying to place himself and his judgment before the people who were there and were trained to identify such objects. Driver's license cards were something they handled every day. They knew the difference between an application and license. The card was clearly referred to as a "driver's license". Only a person not mindful of their credibility and desperate to deny H&L would dare such a sloppy claim.

The bungling failure of the deniers to refute this obvious driver's license creates big problems for the attackers of Armstrong's theory because it is strong proof of an existing and well-used license long before Oswald applied for a driver's license. It would make sense that such a license existed because any Oswald doubles would want to avoid bringing attention to themselves by being caught driving without one. The deniers are ignoring the numerous sightings of Oswald driving, or creating silly excuses for these events like the application.