17-07-2015, 06:57 PM
(This post was last modified: 17-07-2015, 07:46 PM by Albert Doyle.)
Couldn't the driver's license application entered in Warren Commission evidence be traced to see if it is still in evidence?
The application is Commission Exhibit 112. If it was found at the boarding house its chain of possession doesn't allow it to detour to the Texas Public Safety office before returning to Commission evidence. Ms Frair said the driver's license came right from the existing file for Lee Harvey Oswald. Parker's claim makes no sense at all considering that the application being found at the boarding house means it wasn't ever sent in. So therefore Parker commits a rogue violation of investigation of evidence when he ignores that Oswald couldn't possibly have an established file at the Texas Public Safety office when he hadn't even sent in his driver's license application. Ms Frair said Oswald had an established IBM data card for his driver's license.
It makes sense that if the application was found at the boarding house that therefore it went straight to evidence and never took the long route to the Public Safety office. More likely the application went to evidence and stayed in evidence, never leaving. Therefore it would be impossible to make the ridiculous claim that the application is what the Public Safety office employees witnessed. Once you eliminate the application those who deny H&L are standing with their britches down around their ankles as far as being able to explain away this pure evidence of H&L.
The license does it. The attackers are what is dead here.
.
The application is Commission Exhibit 112. If it was found at the boarding house its chain of possession doesn't allow it to detour to the Texas Public Safety office before returning to Commission evidence. Ms Frair said the driver's license came right from the existing file for Lee Harvey Oswald. Parker's claim makes no sense at all considering that the application being found at the boarding house means it wasn't ever sent in. So therefore Parker commits a rogue violation of investigation of evidence when he ignores that Oswald couldn't possibly have an established file at the Texas Public Safety office when he hadn't even sent in his driver's license application. Ms Frair said Oswald had an established IBM data card for his driver's license.
It makes sense that if the application was found at the boarding house that therefore it went straight to evidence and never took the long route to the Public Safety office. More likely the application went to evidence and stayed in evidence, never leaving. Therefore it would be impossible to make the ridiculous claim that the application is what the Public Safety office employees witnessed. Once you eliminate the application those who deny H&L are standing with their britches down around their ankles as far as being able to explain away this pure evidence of H&L.
The license does it. The attackers are what is dead here.
.