20-07-2015, 10:20 PM
Albert Doyle Wrote:Tom Scully Wrote:The record in the images above supports that it is reasonable to be troubled about what possibly could be driving Mr. Doyle's seemingly very intense and certain
opinions. Even taking allowing for distrust of the FBI, what is there in this particular controversy to drive out any and all doubt that Mr. Yate's was mentally disturbed and this disturbance influenced him to attempt to insert himself into the investigation of the Assassination of JFK?
Does each and every disturbed individual who contacted the FBI in response to the Assassination of JFK, regardless of the details that emerged of their backgrounds, and of their claims, and of the support they provided for their claims, get a pass, get accepted as more reliable than the conflicts included in the investigative record? If the answer is yes, why spend any additional time in this research?
What is Doyle's broader record of discernment? Has he developed a reputation here for countering what seems to him not to pass the smell test? Are the examples of broad assumptions his sense of things and his research have influenced to be turned around? I can post some examples of him being emphatic and later developments further weaken his adamance. Aggravating the difficulty of identifying such examples is the infrequency of his admission of any misinterpretation.
Mr Scully, you have to resolve yourself to the fact that the FBI is a dirty actor in the Kennedy Assassination and that pretend document-based objective defense of them is an extremely backwards act, all things considered. Attacking some of the worst victims of the assassination like Yates, Pitzer, and others is a very deplorable thing considering how it takes the side of those who murdered Kennedy and wages against some terribly victimized people who can't defend themselves. It's a real act of betrayal for anyone who dares call themselves a conspiracy exposer.
A truer more credible analysis of Ralph Yates would show that he was not the chronic psychotic - you deniers are depending upon to get around the evidence - before his witnessing. You people are trying to get away with ignoring that if Ralph Yates was as mentally ill as you propose that therefore it would have showed up in his work record. There is no such thing and a correct analysis of Yates would show that his alleged FBI-diagnosed mental illness arose in direct proportion to his refusing to back down from what he knew to be true.
If you look at the deniers method they take maximum advantage of all the dirty tricks FBI pulled. Yates' family had a history of mental vulnerability. Yates was exactly the type of personality that could be induced into such symptoms with the right prompting. If you think FBI wasn't aware of this and didn't exploit it to its maximum you're simply ignorant or deliberately dishonest (Parnell). Yates was broken by FBI shortly after they broke SH Landesberg the same way. And for the same reason. A clear FBI Modus Operandi.
Dempsey Jones confirmed that Yates had told him of this hitch-hiker and his discussing shooting JFK with a high powered rifle from an office building prior to the assassination. The reason Yates rushed-in and told Jones this was because it was strangely similar to a conversation they had a few weeks earlier. Greg Parker tried to dismiss Yates on grounds of mental illness. However he changed his story once he realized the facts were too strong and is now claiming the hitch-hiker was toothless Larry Crafard.
After trying to break Yates, instead of honestly investigating his witnessing our FBI Gestapo finally gave Yates a polygraph. After it was done the FBI agent admitted to Yates' wife Dorothy that the polygraph showed Yates was telling the truth. This machine confirmed as truthful all of the details Yates had provided about his witnessing, including the rifle, showing photos of the man holding the rifle, discussion of shooting Kennedy, the hitch-hiker walking toward the Depository entrance after being dropped-off, and the man being identical to Oswald. This event is also useful in showing the accuracy of FBI documents. For in their report FBI said the polygraph was "inconclusive", however the witness Mrs Yates confirmed that FBI admitted it showed Yates was telling the truth.
Yes, Scully, something is driving Mr Doyle's strong conviction...
Yes, agreed: Yates told the truth.