Ralph Yates

[Tom Scully]

Is everything I have posted from the record in attempting to support my dismissal of Yates's veracity and of the importance of what he had to say, irrelevant, especially considering it seems preposterous to me on it's face, even if he had presented a verifiable reason for being in a position to pick up the hitch hiker, as well as a reputation as a healthy and a credible person, according to his wife and co-workers. Is a single one of my cites of any value or influence?

Scully,

The FBI is trying to discredit Yates. That means the information they provide in their reports is skewed in order to produce the desired outcome. You present FBI reports as if they were innocent and truth-seeking when in fact there is every reason to believe they are the opposite and do not contain the worthy information you suggest. So far I have yet to see you acknowledge this.

Do you believe the FBI reports on Oswald that back the Warren Commission?

Where we left off on this is Yates passed his polygraph and it showed he was telling the truth. You never responded.

I never responded because you asserted that "Yates passed his polygraph". If you have something to challenge the FBI report of the polygraph test which states the test was inconclusive because Yates's metabolic measurements that a polygraph is designed to record for the purpose of fluctuations observed and analyzed by a trained polygraph technician did not deviate during baseline questioning,or during any questioning, I am certainly willing to consider it. You have not made a favorable impression, so far, insisting that Yates "passed"..... that the polygraph somehow measured and confirmed his truthfulness. Mr. Doyle, Yates passed no polygraph test. His wife passed along what she claimed to have heard said orally to her by someone 42 years earlier, as described in the writing of DC Dave.

Your claim is unsupported compared to the Yates polygraph result reported in the FBI record. What was there for me to actually reply to, your invalid opinion? I was persuaded by your response following my detailed post that there is no reasoning with you on the matter of the Yates polygraph controversy.

My central reason for replying to you now is that you are insisting, and I want to share with you that this is not my first rodeo. I have analyzed and come to conclusions about surprisingly similar controversies. I do not believe all witnesses who are smeared are successfully discredited, but I do know how to pick my shots. You do not indicate that you have honed your ability to prioritize what to embrace and what to distance yourself from.

A tale of a man, a military officer who made extraordinary claims related to the JFK assassination who was investigated and found to be initially persuasive, but then documented as mentally ill.:

http://jfkcountercoup.blogspot.com/2011/...ation.html
The Sequoia & the JFK Assassination

NARA Record Number: 124-10369-10008
ADMIN FOLDER-X8: HSCA ADMINISTRATIVE FOLDER, LEE HARVEY OSWALD VOLUME XI
http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archiv...PageId=188
.............
But the clincher is Tom Scully's discovery that Berzon and Ismay were US Naval Academy classmates, who graduated in 1951, shortly before Ismay was assigned to Quantico. ..........

Bill Kelly said... I thought I had updated this, but I have been in contact with Ishmay and believe him that he did not have knowledge of a Korth conspiracy.
August 8, 2013 at 10:59 PM

William Kelly - Posted 08 November 2011
..........
I've exchanged some emails with the former Capt. of the Sequoia who says that Korth did have some parties aboard for big wigs, and also took his family - his wife and kids on holiday cruises on the Potomac.

BK

As I posted, I recognize my bias and I try not to permit it to cloud the details I actually obtain from research and then analyze as I attempt to form accurate opinions and conclusions. An alternative would be to linger endlessly over the trivial and the dead end.