23-07-2015, 04:29 PM
The H&L attackers shouldn't be let off the hook with the Driver's License. The main attacker said the Driver's License issue wasn't important anyway. That person just doesn't want to admit their challenge of Armstrong blew-up on them and there isn't anything behind their boasts that they have debunked Armstrong.
Any credible or honest researcher would admit that once all the excuses are discredited that therefore it is reasonable to assume the 6 Texas Department of Public Safety employees who saw the Driver's License saw a Driver's License and that it possessed Lee Harvey Oswald's name. If this witnessing wasn't proof enough FBI's disappearing of the Driver's License is.
This evidence is very important because it shows that a worn Driver's License with Oswald's name was used by someone. It makes sense that the numerous sightings of a driving Oswald almost certainly were of a person possessing a Driver's License since it would be unlikely such a person would be driving around without one. So instead of being unimportant this is now a very important validation of Armstrong and strong evidence towards the validity of his theory.
The H&L attackers want you to move on from the Driver's License issue because it totally discredits their denial and they don't want to admit it. They shouldn't be let off the hook because this one case shows how uncredible they are and how much they are begging to be taken seriously when their input shows they are basically clowns in contempt of the evidence and have nothing to say when backed in to a corner by the real evidence Armstrong shows. It's rather dishonest to refer to a poll when you are so publicly unable to answer obvious evidence.
Any credible or honest researcher would admit that once all the excuses are discredited that therefore it is reasonable to assume the 6 Texas Department of Public Safety employees who saw the Driver's License saw a Driver's License and that it possessed Lee Harvey Oswald's name. If this witnessing wasn't proof enough FBI's disappearing of the Driver's License is.
This evidence is very important because it shows that a worn Driver's License with Oswald's name was used by someone. It makes sense that the numerous sightings of a driving Oswald almost certainly were of a person possessing a Driver's License since it would be unlikely such a person would be driving around without one. So instead of being unimportant this is now a very important validation of Armstrong and strong evidence towards the validity of his theory.
The H&L attackers want you to move on from the Driver's License issue because it totally discredits their denial and they don't want to admit it. They shouldn't be let off the hook because this one case shows how uncredible they are and how much they are begging to be taken seriously when their input shows they are basically clowns in contempt of the evidence and have nothing to say when backed in to a corner by the real evidence Armstrong shows. It's rather dishonest to refer to a poll when you are so publicly unable to answer obvious evidence.