04-08-2015, 05:38 PM
The TWA 800 shootdown is probably one of the top twelve cover-ups. It happened 5 years prior to 9-11. The brazen-ness of the cover-up can be traced back to the Kennedy assassination. The Warren Commission was the start of a new CIA type of government where the powers that be would have their own way by their own hidden word.
The reason TWA 800 is important is because the evidence is much clearer than the Kennedy assassination. Oscilloscope examination of the cockpit recorder caught a 2000 foot per second blast frequency in the recording. When a blast hits the recorder mechanism it acts as a resonator of the frequency shockwave that hits it. The cockpit tapes possessed the fingerprint of a 2000 foot per second shockwave that couldn't possibly be confused with the slower 300 foot per second blast of a fuel explosion.
The wreckage contained a 3 row wide swath of reddish purple residue across the seats. Like the residue in the Kennedy assassination, one of the investigators noticed FBI wasn't making any kind of effort to examine it. So he snuck some samples out to ex-police detective James Sanders who took it to an independent laboratory in Los Angeles where the residue tested positive as PETN, the chemical used as a propellant in US missiles. FBI stormed in and confiscated all the samples and threatened Sanders with 5 years in jail. They then said they tested the samples and the residue was fabric adhesive glue. The only problem is the NASA scientist who FBI claimed did the test, Charlie Bassett, wrote a letter of protest saying he never did any such test. FBI never responded.
Physicist Dr Thomas Stalcup examined the radar data and found it captured debris exiting the starboard side of Flight 800 at mach 4. The starboard side is in the continuing direction of the missile seen streaking towards the 747. Mach 4 ejecta would perfectly conform to a 2000 foot per second warhead explosion and missile trajectory. It would be impossible for a 300 foot per second fuel explosion to create that radar pattern.
The Long Island coroner found many small pellets in some of the victims. He sent them on to FBI where they tested them. The tests showed the pellets contained the exact same metals used in US warhead shrapnel. The metals were not used in 747 construction so they had to have come from something else. FBI made a 36 page report on the pellets. MIT professor Graeme Sephton sued FBI in Boston federal court in order to recover the report. FBI said it looked for the report but couldn't find it. The judge said that although he thought FBI acted poorly he was finding in their favor.
The Borgesson/Stalcup 2013 documentary had 6 NTSB agents complaining that they discovered missile evidence but were ordered to cover it up.
None of this was mentioned in the NBC Weather Channel program. So in the case of Flight 800 a simple lawsuit has much potential energy and cascading evidence ready to be sprung. Really Tracy, this should be obvious. This case has much more evidentiary traction and potential to expose government criminality on a legal basis than most other famous cover-ups. What TWA 800 is like is like having photos and evidence of a fence shooter and not pressing it. The conspiracy community has a sort of Stockholm Syndrome where it participates in its own ineffectiveness by whatever excuse. To say it isn't worth it is to participate in the droning excuses the public presently uses to avoid taking action.
The reason TWA 800 is important is because the evidence is much clearer than the Kennedy assassination. Oscilloscope examination of the cockpit recorder caught a 2000 foot per second blast frequency in the recording. When a blast hits the recorder mechanism it acts as a resonator of the frequency shockwave that hits it. The cockpit tapes possessed the fingerprint of a 2000 foot per second shockwave that couldn't possibly be confused with the slower 300 foot per second blast of a fuel explosion.
The wreckage contained a 3 row wide swath of reddish purple residue across the seats. Like the residue in the Kennedy assassination, one of the investigators noticed FBI wasn't making any kind of effort to examine it. So he snuck some samples out to ex-police detective James Sanders who took it to an independent laboratory in Los Angeles where the residue tested positive as PETN, the chemical used as a propellant in US missiles. FBI stormed in and confiscated all the samples and threatened Sanders with 5 years in jail. They then said they tested the samples and the residue was fabric adhesive glue. The only problem is the NASA scientist who FBI claimed did the test, Charlie Bassett, wrote a letter of protest saying he never did any such test. FBI never responded.
Physicist Dr Thomas Stalcup examined the radar data and found it captured debris exiting the starboard side of Flight 800 at mach 4. The starboard side is in the continuing direction of the missile seen streaking towards the 747. Mach 4 ejecta would perfectly conform to a 2000 foot per second warhead explosion and missile trajectory. It would be impossible for a 300 foot per second fuel explosion to create that radar pattern.
The Long Island coroner found many small pellets in some of the victims. He sent them on to FBI where they tested them. The tests showed the pellets contained the exact same metals used in US warhead shrapnel. The metals were not used in 747 construction so they had to have come from something else. FBI made a 36 page report on the pellets. MIT professor Graeme Sephton sued FBI in Boston federal court in order to recover the report. FBI said it looked for the report but couldn't find it. The judge said that although he thought FBI acted poorly he was finding in their favor.
The Borgesson/Stalcup 2013 documentary had 6 NTSB agents complaining that they discovered missile evidence but were ordered to cover it up.
None of this was mentioned in the NBC Weather Channel program. So in the case of Flight 800 a simple lawsuit has much potential energy and cascading evidence ready to be sprung. Really Tracy, this should be obvious. This case has much more evidentiary traction and potential to expose government criminality on a legal basis than most other famous cover-ups. What TWA 800 is like is like having photos and evidence of a fence shooter and not pressing it. The conspiracy community has a sort of Stockholm Syndrome where it participates in its own ineffectiveness by whatever excuse. To say it isn't worth it is to participate in the droning excuses the public presently uses to avoid taking action.