2017JFK.org has been launched with content

[Tom Scully]

Let's keep it real, reacting to the actual details? I demonstrated in my first post in this thread (" Feeling left out? ") that Peter Dale Scott is bestowing thanks, presumably for access to MFF research materials, but in this as many as fourteen years old document, the gatekeeper(s) exhibits a vague description of who would be worthy of access. It also covers the state of the storage of the physical MFF archive. The
source, John Kirsch, is a former Fort Worth newspaper reporter of eight years, with a prior journalism resume in Des Moines.....

http://jfkresearch.me/2015/03/04/irs-rec...oundation/
Document image below from John Kirsch's page at link above, following these, recent, rather defensive comments from Larry Hancock.:

http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index....2&p=307000

Posted 26 June 2015 - 01:21 PM
Well I know that lots of folks love as many conspiracies as possible but since I'm directly associated with Rex Bradford and the MFF I would answer that you can trust it - based on my personal experience. Rex has done an immense job of putting Mary's documents on line and the bulk of her physical and non-documented materials have been transferred to Baylor University and its archives for physical access. Rex has increasingly worked with the ARRC to put additional material online beyond Mary's documents and on line access to a range of material none of us dreamed of back over a decade ago. For those who want to go back to where it was when I started, with individual requests to NARA and waits of months and years plus hundreds of dollars in duplicate page copy expenses - have at it. For those with doubts, have you ever thought of actually communicating directly with Rex and asking questions? The one problem that we have is that there are now generations of unredactions in documents so I know from personal experience that you can find more extant versions of individual documents than were available to Mary. In fact Stu Wexler and I have found that if you request the same document three or four times you may get increasingly more content....not sure how that works but we have certainly seen it. Heck, maybe that's a conspiracy too....perhaps its all part of a grand plot to discredit Judyth.....that must be it....


Larry replies to a post by Dawn....:
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index....2&p=307046
Posted 26 June 2015 - 07:52 PM

I've certainly heard enough to know that there were issues around Mary - and that she was accused of building files on researchers. I also know she would "assign" projects, one I recall was getting a couple of folks to go to Mexico City to research the address on the "Hunt letter". I came in relatively late, I do know a few of my subjects that she was very interested in and wanted to discuss but I never got anything more than encouragement. I also recall Harrison Livingston's book which cast her and several of the Dallas researchers in a negative light and really came down hard on Mary for keeping track of researchers. Given my history with both Harry and Mary I'm pretty comfortable with giving that round to Mary...grin.

Anyway, I suppose anyone who has been into this as deeply and as long as Mary was is bound to pick up a good deal of baggage and for that matter make some mistakes, I know I have. I'll confine myself to commenting on the MFF which I did see jell early on as Ollie Curme was actually acquiring the material from Mary. I've worked with Rex since then (and longer, back to when HTML and pdfs were both new and exciting) so I do have a pretty good picture of that part of the story....and I was the one who first linked Ben and Rex up on what ultimately was the hard copy transfer of materials to Baylor. All part of my document geekishness I suppose..