17-09-2015, 05:02 PM
(This post was last modified: 17-09-2015, 05:30 PM by Albert Doyle.)
Graves (as much as I hate agreeing with a person I consider a troll) is correct and the black color of that blob behind Prayer Man's neck is only associated with hair tones in the photo. If you look at the photo, the black blob can only be hair because it is the only thing with that precise color tone. Since it is behind the neck that means it is wavy long hair. And since wavy long hair cannot possibly be associated with Oswald that excludes him as Prayer Man.
This is basic photo analysis.
Ignoring it only comes at the cost of the researchers who do so.
This is what I meant by there are a lot of people who really want to put Oswald on the front steps. You can see the evidence they ignore in order to make their arguments work. - Which, again, is not a sound research practice and comes at the expense of those who do it. It's disheartening to see some very good minds fall in to petty group think and wishful thinking.
I can't believe main researchers would actually allow Greg Parker to straight-facedly try to correct Carolyn Arnold and say her memory was wrong. Typical of deniers, Parker then quotes the FBI report time of 12:15 even though Mrs Arnold was on record as saying to Golz that she actually told FBI 12:25. And no assassination researcher says anything. At that point those researchers are aiding in the destruction of their own credibility. Parker is simply a crude hack trying to bend things his way.
.
This is basic photo analysis.
Ignoring it only comes at the cost of the researchers who do so.
This is what I meant by there are a lot of people who really want to put Oswald on the front steps. You can see the evidence they ignore in order to make their arguments work. - Which, again, is not a sound research practice and comes at the expense of those who do it. It's disheartening to see some very good minds fall in to petty group think and wishful thinking.
I can't believe main researchers would actually allow Greg Parker to straight-facedly try to correct Carolyn Arnold and say her memory was wrong. Typical of deniers, Parker then quotes the FBI report time of 12:15 even though Mrs Arnold was on record as saying to Golz that she actually told FBI 12:25. And no assassination researcher says anything. At that point those researchers are aiding in the destruction of their own credibility. Parker is simply a crude hack trying to bend things his way.
.