Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Sean Murphy's research deserves more
Parker is just a sloppy excuse-maker who doesn't answer the issues and only digs himself in deeper.



Again, Parker is an arrogant disinformationist and flagrant liar. After being shown Carolyn Arnold's statement to Golz several times, where she emphasized that she did not see Oswald on the 1st floor, Greg ignores it and repeats his claim that she did. Greg is going to insist on this no matter how many times the actual person whom he speaking of disclaimed it. Again, we are talking about a person who now qualifies for a psychological condition considering his imperviousness to fact. Greg Parker is going to correct Carolyn Arnold even if she was there and he wasn't. No matter how many times she denies it.


Greg really tries to get away with a Judyth Bakerism in his next excuse. He claims that Mrs Arnold thought the motorcade was supposed to arrive at 12:25 so that was the time she gave FBI when she actually left at 12:30. Bullshit. Mrs Arnold's statement where she mentioned 12:25 was given on March 18 1964, 4 months after the assassination when the 12:30 shooting time had been saturated into the public's mind by media coverage. Greg suggests that a main witness and person who witnessed the shooting would not be intensely aware of this fact. No, nice try Bullshit Greg. What is painfully clear is Carolyn Arnold said she left the Depository building at 12:25, as she complained to Golz. Greg is tinkering with context here. Carolyn Arnold never said she made a comment on when she left the Depository and went home. She was simply saying when she left the building to go out and watch the motorcade. That time was 12:25. That means she saw Oswald in the lunch-room a minute earlier. Greg is stretching context to make it sound like Carolyn was responding to when she went home. That isn't at all what she said. Once again Greg is fabricating that and telling it with full confidence when in fact there is absolutely no indication of it in the actual record. Greg has no problem with the fact FBI lied about Mrs Arnold seeing Oswald on the 1st floor in the same November 26 1963 report where they claimed 12:15.


Greg again gives a non-response response where he gives recklessly inaccurate information and schmoozes an answer that doesn't really faithfully reflect the true record or what is actually being said. Greg is basically a disinformation troll making it up as he goes along. He's an obfuscator and liar. The real truth that Greg is taking pains to avoid is that Carolyn Arnold told FBI 12:25 as the one and only time she left the Depository. The correct context was that she left the 2nd floor at that time with the intention of going out to watch the parade. When the assassination happened Mrs Arnold left. Greg tries to get around this with one of his classic Judyth Baker Jerry-built excuses, but he can't even make that believable either. Smart people will realize Mrs Arnold is speaking in the context of when she was last able to see Oswald who was presumed to be inside. When she gave the time she left the Depository it was in the context of what FBI was interested in - that is when she last had the opportunity to witness Oswald. So the 12:25 claim is in the context of when she left the Depository building. There's simply no way Carolyn Arnold didn't know that JFK was shot at 12:30 4 months after the assassination. It is very obvious that Mrs Arnold said she left the 2nd floor at 12:25, like she told FBI, and then went home after the assassination. When she told FBI what time she left the Depository building she said 12:25. That's what she meant by she left the building at 12:25 and never came back. When Golz showed her the 12:15 claim, she protested she never said that. She said she claimed 12:25 - which she did.



.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Sean Murphy's research deserves more - by Albert Doyle - 19-09-2015, 04:12 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Roger Odisio Plants Credibility Time Bomb At Heart Of CT Research Brian Doyle 8 1,537 07-06-2024, 06:18 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Jim Hargrove Chooses Politics Over Good Research Brian Doyle 0 383 12-01-2024, 10:17 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  The JFK Research Community Is Responsible For This Brian Doyle 0 456 28-11-2023, 04:48 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  How The Education Forum Destroyed Credible JFK Research Brian Doyle 8 1,586 09-07-2023, 09:35 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  DiEugenio Betrays Conspiracy Research Brian Doyle 1 748 07-07-2023, 04:32 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  EXCELLENT Research on LHO & Ruth Hyde Paine [and family] - Linda Minor Peter Lemkin 15 40,586 29-07-2019, 08:06 PM
Last Post: Tom Scully
  JFK Research Methodology James Lateer 19 28,833 02-07-2018, 04:00 PM
Last Post: James Lateer
  Sean Murphy- wrong again!!! Richard Gilbride 15 13,047 01-02-2017, 12:18 AM
Last Post: Scott Kaiser
  THE ANTI-LATELL REPORT Dr. Latell’s Involution in JFK Assassination Research A RNALDO M. F ERNANDEZ Magda Hassan 0 3,101 25-12-2015, 07:19 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  UPDATED RESEARCH: Front Throat Shot Research Analysis "Z225" / Contact for free copy Anthony DeFiore 0 2,085 28-12-2014, 04:48 PM
Last Post: Anthony DeFiore

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)