22-09-2015, 06:34 AM
Greg Parker is psychological. He's spinning a pre-emptive case of speculative contrivances that subjectively judge Carolyn Arnold's thoughts and motives and using that to dismiss what Mrs Arnold herself said and insisted.
He's using a desperate canard that Mrs Arnold confused the expected 12:25 original motorcade time with the actual 12:30 shooting time and that explains her statements. He's hinging everything on the claim that Carolyn Arnold would not have left the building at 12:25 for a motorcade that was scheduled to arrive at 12:25. All this is totally irrelevant though since Carolyn Arnold is the one who insisted it was 12:25.
Parker is also ignoring the fact that Mrs Arnold had 4 months of intense personal and media exposure showing the shooting happened at 12:30 prior to her March 1964 statement where she told FBI she left the building at 12:25.
Parker criticizes Golz for not questioning Carolyn Arnold why she left the building at the same time as the expected motorcade? Or if she knew the motorcade was running late? But it seems pretty obvious to me that the reason Golz didn't ask those things is because both he and Carolyn Arnold understood the gist of the interview was exposing FBI manipulation and lies concerning her testimony. Parker buys those lies and accepts FBI's 12:15 claim, never hesitating over the fact the same report also contained a claim that Mrs Arnold saw Oswald by the front door - something she strongly denied to Golz. To Parker it is Carolyn Arnold who is lying, not the FBI.
Parker once again puts his disinformation psychology into full gear and posits Carolyn Arnold told FBI she saw Oswald by the front door in her 1963 statement. He takes the FBI's side and says that's why they never mentioned her lunch-room sighting in either report. It never dawns on Parker that FBI might have not mentioned that encounter because they were trying to cover-up evidence that Oswald didn't shoot Kennedy. It also doesn't bother Parker that Mrs Arnold strongly denied saying 12:15 to FBI. Parker is a person who thinks his speculative contrivances rule reality and will correct Mrs Arnold on that.
He's using a desperate canard that Mrs Arnold confused the expected 12:25 original motorcade time with the actual 12:30 shooting time and that explains her statements. He's hinging everything on the claim that Carolyn Arnold would not have left the building at 12:25 for a motorcade that was scheduled to arrive at 12:25. All this is totally irrelevant though since Carolyn Arnold is the one who insisted it was 12:25.
Parker is also ignoring the fact that Mrs Arnold had 4 months of intense personal and media exposure showing the shooting happened at 12:30 prior to her March 1964 statement where she told FBI she left the building at 12:25.
Parker criticizes Golz for not questioning Carolyn Arnold why she left the building at the same time as the expected motorcade? Or if she knew the motorcade was running late? But it seems pretty obvious to me that the reason Golz didn't ask those things is because both he and Carolyn Arnold understood the gist of the interview was exposing FBI manipulation and lies concerning her testimony. Parker buys those lies and accepts FBI's 12:15 claim, never hesitating over the fact the same report also contained a claim that Mrs Arnold saw Oswald by the front door - something she strongly denied to Golz. To Parker it is Carolyn Arnold who is lying, not the FBI.
Parker once again puts his disinformation psychology into full gear and posits Carolyn Arnold told FBI she saw Oswald by the front door in her 1963 statement. He takes the FBI's side and says that's why they never mentioned her lunch-room sighting in either report. It never dawns on Parker that FBI might have not mentioned that encounter because they were trying to cover-up evidence that Oswald didn't shoot Kennedy. It also doesn't bother Parker that Mrs Arnold strongly denied saying 12:15 to FBI. Parker is a person who thinks his speculative contrivances rule reality and will correct Mrs Arnold on that.