Sean Murphy's research deserves more

[Michael Cross]

The things I'm talking about would be available just the same in the best original image you could present that would meet whatever criteria you demand.

You have failed to show why the existing photograph isn't valid for the things I'm pointing out. You're still not answering the point.


You're dodging Mr Healy. I find your argument method dishonest.

My God, you're delusional Albert. You don't KNOW that the "talking about would be available just the same in the best original image you could present that would meet whatever criteria you demand". That image you are so in love with has been heavily altered. Your inability to recognize that confounds the mind. Every time I resign myself to just leave this alone because arguing with a fool is pointless, you post another definitive statement based on fairy dust and duct tape.

Mr Healy IS a photographic expert. If you are a researcher that has any interest in objective fact you should pay attention to him. He's correct.

And I KNOW without having to read it, what your closed minded response will be.