Sean Murphy's research deserves more

[David Josephs]

David Healy IS a skilled expert Albert... you're backing the wrong horse here buddy.

Let's get real, okay?

David,


Healy is the guy who was over on the Education Forum apologizing to the infamous blowhard and liar Greg Parker and endorsing Parker's bullshit. Healy wrote that he apologized and retracted everything he said and acknowledged Parker's material.


You were saying?

How long have YOU know David?
Have you ever discussed the photo/video aspects of the case with him?
WTF do you know about photo/video mechanics that you can challendge Healy anyway... Been taking "Lamson" classes? ::face.palm::

I happen to know the reasons behind that apology which will remain between me and David.... suffice to say - you really don't know what you're talking about and it would probably be a good idea not to stick your neck out so far into matters in which you remain clueless.

As anyone who has spent 5 minutes at that cesspool of a forum the infamous "blowhard" runs knows - there are 4 or 5 who circle jerk to every one of his threads/posts (which in most threads are 95% of the posts)
and the rest of the time he is over at the EF spreading the love.

One has to wonder why this group is so concerned with refuting Armstrong's H&L proof so vehemently and so poorly at every turn.
Oh that's right - he's trying to sell a book series which falls apart completely if he can't completely refute H&L's evidence.

------------------------

But this thread is about Prayerman and what amounts to the acceptance of very speculative work on an image which is 3/5th of a millimeter in area off the original frame.

Unless a better version of that frame from Weigman can be found we are left with a very poor, very very small image from which claiming to identify buttons is complete fantasy.