Another in the endless mass shootings in USA - this time Denver

[R.K. Locke]

There is precedent both in the UK and Australia for deep events to be used as a pretext for disarming the populace. I am not pro-gun by any means but there is a big picture to be taken into account here. What we are looking at in many of these cases (and I have not studied this most recent incident in any detail) is deep events. It's unfortunate that many people immediately resort to describing them as "staged" or "hoaxes" but that should not deter us from giving them the critical attention that they deserve.

Some context:

http://www.express.co.uk/comment/columni...ench-media

https://www.nexusmagazine.com/index.php?...&Itemid=71

Yes, the Port Arthur massacre in Australia had a lot of problems with the official story, but the victims were real.

Is there a case where you think the victims weren't real?

Not me, but there are many people who embrace the idea that Sandy Hook and others included fake victims ("crisis actors"). That's what I was referring to earlier.

People who focus on the "fake victims"/"crisis actors" angle would be much better off highlighting the mountains of credible (and less controversial) evidence that exists in all these cases. Even if it is true, most people will simply tune out if you start trying to convince them of something so out of the ordinary.