10-10-2015, 02:55 AM
Which had nothing to do with the rest of the evidence. If Janney withdrew because he didn't have enough evidence doesn't mean Mitchell wasn't the spook who tried to frame Crump and then disappeared to England and lied about the funding. It was Janney who proved Mitchell lied about the funding source for that hiatus. This is strong evidence Mitchell was a hot operator on assignment. His being removed to England after the Crump set-up failed should not be overlooked.
Wiggins was there and he tends to disagree with your view. He said he felt like he was being set-up to witness the event. The car was the weak link. It had to be perfectly placed and because of that it had to be faked. Once it was faked they didn't have any documentation or excuse on how it got to that exact spot. The smoking gun for an Intel job.
I'm sure Scully is out there brewing up a 3 foot long post that deals with the tow truck driver's 3rd cousin once removed and all his dental records and the relatives of the dentist.
When you really have your ear to the ground you'll realize the dead quiet about Janney accusing Mitchell in the media speaks louder than anything. It doesn't make sense that such a serious accusation would get no coverage.
Wiggins was there and he tends to disagree with your view. He said he felt like he was being set-up to witness the event. The car was the weak link. It had to be perfectly placed and because of that it had to be faked. Once it was faked they didn't have any documentation or excuse on how it got to that exact spot. The smoking gun for an Intel job.
I'm sure Scully is out there brewing up a 3 foot long post that deals with the tow truck driver's 3rd cousin once removed and all his dental records and the relatives of the dentist.
When you really have your ear to the ground you'll realize the dead quiet about Janney accusing Mitchell in the media speaks louder than anything. It doesn't make sense that such a serious accusation would get no coverage.