Sean Murphy's research deserves more

[Albert Doyle]

Albert,

You don't see any difference between what David just showed with photoshop and what Duncan/John Mytton did?

Really?

Maybe David should put them side by side.

You're not answering the points about the original Jim. I find that somewhat uncredible of you.


I believe that if you find the original Darnell frame it will contain the things Duncan points out and therefore refute your unproven claim of alteration. Sorry, but the buttons are there and you aren't answering it. You're not applying science because the buttons are uniform and in a row which proves they can't be random irregularities. When you have 4 all lined up where they should be you're beyond the excuses David is using and into proof. There's no way that Oswald's or any man's shirt was as low as the lowest button - which proves it is a coat and therefore it isn't Oswald. Sorry Jim but your answers show a lack of sophisticated analysis.


David did not answer.