21-10-2015, 05:46 PM
I couldn't get the image to upload in the last post... THIS is why Farid's work is junk... Tom's work on WHY they may be coerced to cooperate is wonderful - but does not explain why the BYP are not real.
Farid teamed with Assistant Professor Emily Whiting, who specializes in architectural geometry, computer-aided design and 3-D fabrication. With the help of graduate student Srivamshi Pittala, they built a physiologically plausible 3-D model of Oswald and posed this model to match his appearance in the backyard photo. By adding the appropriate mass to each part of the 3-D model, they were able to perform a balance analysis on the 3-D model. This analysis revealed that although Oswald appears off-balance, his pose is stable. The analysis also revealed that the lighting and shadows are physically plausible and the length of the rifle is consistent with the length of the rifle used to kill the president.
Yet when we take a look we see that they did not position him correctly or even very close. On the left I used his right ear as the anchor, in the right I used the Rifle and hand...
This, like Myers is pure junk science and justifies Tom's speculation that those controlling the strings would prefer to push the results into that direction regardless of the quality or reproduceablility of the science.
DJ
![[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=7591&stc=1]](https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=7591&stc=1)
![[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=7592&stc=1]](https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=7592&stc=1)
Farid teamed with Assistant Professor Emily Whiting, who specializes in architectural geometry, computer-aided design and 3-D fabrication. With the help of graduate student Srivamshi Pittala, they built a physiologically plausible 3-D model of Oswald and posed this model to match his appearance in the backyard photo. By adding the appropriate mass to each part of the 3-D model, they were able to perform a balance analysis on the 3-D model. This analysis revealed that although Oswald appears off-balance, his pose is stable. The analysis also revealed that the lighting and shadows are physically plausible and the length of the rifle is consistent with the length of the rifle used to kill the president.
Yet when we take a look we see that they did not position him correctly or even very close. On the left I used his right ear as the anchor, in the right I used the Rifle and hand...
This, like Myers is pure junk science and justifies Tom's speculation that those controlling the strings would prefer to push the results into that direction regardless of the quality or reproduceablility of the science.
DJ
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter